Tracy K Richmond, Emily Farbman Kadish, Monique Santoso, Carly E Milliren, Meredith Kells, Genevieve Alice Woolverton, Elizabeth R Woods, Sara F Forman
{"title":"Building RECOVERY: development of the registry of eating disorders and their co-morbidities OVER time in youth.","authors":"Tracy K Richmond, Emily Farbman Kadish, Monique Santoso, Carly E Milliren, Meredith Kells, Genevieve Alice Woolverton, Elizabeth R Woods, Sara F Forman","doi":"10.1186/s40337-024-01097-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eating disorder (ED) research is limited by the lack of longitudinal cohort studies, particularly those in adolescents, and the lack of inclusion of multiple perspectives and diagnoses. The objective of this study was to describe the development of a longitudinal cohort of adolescents/young adults representing varied ED diagnoses and including perspectives of parents and multi-disciplinary clinicians in addition to those of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients of an outpatient ED program who were age 10-27 years, along with their parents and clinicians, were recruited to participate in a longitudinal web-based study. Using univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses, we assessed rates of participation among different groups (i.e., parents, patients, different clinical disciplines) as well as factors related to attrition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>71% of patients, 75% of parents, 56% of adolescent medicine providers, 20% of primary care physicians, 83% of dietitians, and 80% of mental health clinicians invited agreed to participate. At 12 months, 32% of patient participants had not completed their on-line surveys. Attrition rates were higher for parents (55%) and clinicians (45% of nutritionists, 55% of primary care physicians, 51% of Adolescent/Young Adult providers, and 64% of mental health providers) at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A longitudinal registry of patients with EDs is feasible and efficient when using web-based surveys. However, clinician participation is particularly hard to secure and maintain.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"12 1","pages":"147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11430501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01097-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Eating disorder (ED) research is limited by the lack of longitudinal cohort studies, particularly those in adolescents, and the lack of inclusion of multiple perspectives and diagnoses. The objective of this study was to describe the development of a longitudinal cohort of adolescents/young adults representing varied ED diagnoses and including perspectives of parents and multi-disciplinary clinicians in addition to those of patients.
Methods: Patients of an outpatient ED program who were age 10-27 years, along with their parents and clinicians, were recruited to participate in a longitudinal web-based study. Using univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses, we assessed rates of participation among different groups (i.e., parents, patients, different clinical disciplines) as well as factors related to attrition.
Results: 71% of patients, 75% of parents, 56% of adolescent medicine providers, 20% of primary care physicians, 83% of dietitians, and 80% of mental health clinicians invited agreed to participate. At 12 months, 32% of patient participants had not completed their on-line surveys. Attrition rates were higher for parents (55%) and clinicians (45% of nutritionists, 55% of primary care physicians, 51% of Adolescent/Young Adult providers, and 64% of mental health providers) at 12 months.
Conclusions: A longitudinal registry of patients with EDs is feasible and efficient when using web-based surveys. However, clinician participation is particularly hard to secure and maintain.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice.
The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.