Development of the Japanese version of the inventory of creative activities and achievements

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101648
Chiaki Ishiguro , Kazuki Matsumoto , Takumitsu Agata , Takeshi Okada
{"title":"Development of the Japanese version of the inventory of creative activities and achievements","authors":"Chiaki Ishiguro ,&nbsp;Kazuki Matsumoto ,&nbsp;Takumitsu Agata ,&nbsp;Takeshi Okada","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Measurement of real-life creativity across various countries serves as the foundation for the cultural psychology of creativity. Although studies have suggested differences in creativity between Western and East Asian countries, the underlying factors remain insufficiently understood. This study focused on Japan, an East Asian country, that was perceived to have high creativity yet exhibited negative self-perceptions of creativity. We translated the Inventory of Creative Activities and Achievements (ICAA), a comprehensive measure of real-life creativity from activities and achievements. Data were collected from various participants, who included creative activity experts and non-experts and spanned from university students to general adults (pro-c: n = 489 and little-c: n = 1485). Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the ICAA was confirmed. However, the Japanese version revealed that Japanese individuals' mean score of creative activities and achievements, even among professionals, was only approximately half of that reported among Western or Chinese university students. Reasons for lower creativity and achievements among the Japanese population have been discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101648"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712400186X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement of real-life creativity across various countries serves as the foundation for the cultural psychology of creativity. Although studies have suggested differences in creativity between Western and East Asian countries, the underlying factors remain insufficiently understood. This study focused on Japan, an East Asian country, that was perceived to have high creativity yet exhibited negative self-perceptions of creativity. We translated the Inventory of Creative Activities and Achievements (ICAA), a comprehensive measure of real-life creativity from activities and achievements. Data were collected from various participants, who included creative activity experts and non-experts and spanned from university students to general adults (pro-c: n = 489 and little-c: n = 1485). Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the ICAA was confirmed. However, the Japanese version revealed that Japanese individuals' mean score of creative activities and achievements, even among professionals, was only approximately half of that reported among Western or Chinese university students. Reasons for lower creativity and achievements among the Japanese population have been discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编制日文版创造性活动和成就清单
对不同国家现实生活中创造力的测量是创造力文化心理学的基础。尽管有研究表明西方国家和东亚国家在创造力方面存在差异,但对其背后的因素仍然了解不足。本研究的重点是东亚国家日本,它被认为具有很高的创造力,但却对创造力表现出消极的自我认知。我们翻译了 "创造性活动和成就清单"(ICAA),这是一个通过活动和成就来全面衡量现实生活中创造力的工具。我们从不同的参与者那里收集了数据,这些参与者包括创造性活动专家和非专家,年龄跨度从大学生到普通成年人(亲c:n = 489,小c:n = 1485)。ICAA日语版的有效性和可靠性得到了确认。然而,日文版显示,日本人的创造性活动和成就的平均得分,即使在专业人士中,也只有西方或中国大学生的一半左右。研究还讨论了日本人创造力和成就较低的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Validation and network structure of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale: A psychometric investigation in an Arabic context Creativity and motor skill learning among kindergarten children: Investigating Predictive correlations and performance differences The influence of group categorization and common ingroup identity on malevolent creativity, benevolent creativity, and neutral creativity The long-term impact of executive functions on everyday creativity among Chinese adolescents: A longitudinal mediation model of emotional resilience and creative self-efficacy Measuring parental behaviors supporting higher order thinking skills in children: A scale development study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1