{"title":"A systematical comparation of Cu (II) adsorption behavior and mechanism between biomass fly ash and biogas residue pyrolysis char","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.biteb.2024.101959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biomass fly ash (BFA) and biogas residues are the main by-products of biomass direct-fired power generation and biogas production. This study compares the Cu(II) adsorption mechanisms of BFA and biogas residue pyrolysis char (BRPC) through systematic tests. BFA exhibited a significantly higher adsorption capacity (75.34 mg/g) than BRPC (42.80 mg/g). The pseudo-first-order kinetic model best described BFA, while the Elovich model was optimal for BRPC. Both materials fit the Freundlich isotherm model. BFA's superior mineral co-precipitation and ion-exchange capacity are due to its rich mineral content, particularly calcium. BRPC benefits from an additional functional group complex adsorption due to its pyrolytic charcoal content. Variations in pore structure of BFA and BRPC did not demonstrate a significant effect on the adsorption. The results of this study provide essential data support for the potential of high-value utilization of BFA and BRPC and the innovative modification of high-performance biomass-based heavy metal adsorbent materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8947,"journal":{"name":"Bioresource Technology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresource Technology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X24002007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biomass fly ash (BFA) and biogas residues are the main by-products of biomass direct-fired power generation and biogas production. This study compares the Cu(II) adsorption mechanisms of BFA and biogas residue pyrolysis char (BRPC) through systematic tests. BFA exhibited a significantly higher adsorption capacity (75.34 mg/g) than BRPC (42.80 mg/g). The pseudo-first-order kinetic model best described BFA, while the Elovich model was optimal for BRPC. Both materials fit the Freundlich isotherm model. BFA's superior mineral co-precipitation and ion-exchange capacity are due to its rich mineral content, particularly calcium. BRPC benefits from an additional functional group complex adsorption due to its pyrolytic charcoal content. Variations in pore structure of BFA and BRPC did not demonstrate a significant effect on the adsorption. The results of this study provide essential data support for the potential of high-value utilization of BFA and BRPC and the innovative modification of high-performance biomass-based heavy metal adsorbent materials.