Identification of marijuana using silver-phosphine ion complexation and a semi-quantitative 1 % decision-point assay

IF 4.1 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Talanta Open Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.talo.2024.100359
Alleigh N. Couch , Jayleigh M. Lanza , Christopher M. Zall , J. Tyler Davidson
{"title":"Identification of marijuana using silver-phosphine ion complexation and a semi-quantitative 1 % decision-point assay","authors":"Alleigh N. Couch ,&nbsp;Jayleigh M. Lanza ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Zall ,&nbsp;J. Tyler Davidson","doi":"10.1016/j.talo.2024.100359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to the strict federal regulations concerning ∆<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆<sup>9</sup>-THC) content for the differentiation of hemp and marijuana outlined in the 2018 Farm Bill, the ability to quickly and reliably differentiate cannabis as marijuana or hemp is crucial within both the seized drug community and hemp industry. This study provides a novel direct mass spectrometry approach for the identification of marijuana using Ag-phosphine ion complexation and a semi-quantitative 1 % decision-point assay. The main constituents of hemp and marijuana, cannabidiol (CBD) and ∆<sup>9</sup>-THC, are isomeric and cannot be differentiated using soft ionization mass spectrometry techniques alone. However, the incorporation of [Ag(PPh<sub>3</sub>)(OTf)]<sub>2</sub> enables the formation of unique MS/MS product ions at <em>m/z</em> 421/423, <em>m/z</em> 353/355, and <em>m/z</em> 231 for CBD due to differences in binding affinity, allowing CBD to be differentiated from ∆<sup>9</sup>-THC. Likewise, the isomeric cannabinoid precursors ∆<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (∆<sup>9</sup>-THCA) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) can be differentiated due to the formation of unique MS/MS product ions at <em>m/z</em> 465/467 and <em>m/z</em> 379/381, which are specific to CBDA. Eight additional cannabinoids were also characterized utilizing the proposed Ag-phosphine ion complexation approach. To reduce the potential for false positives, a more conservative 1 % decision-point assay was developed by fortifying 1 % weight-by-volume ∆<sup>9</sup>-THC-<em>d<sub>9</sub></em> into methanolic extracts of authentic cannabis plant material, followed by assessing if the total ∆<sup>9</sup>-THC content (composed of ∆<sup>9</sup>-THC and ∆<sup>9</sup>-THCA) was greater than or less than the intensity of the spiked internal standard. When the developed approach was applied to 20 methanolic extracts of authentic cannabis samples with known cannabinoid compositions, 90 % of the samples were correctly identified as marijuana or not marijuana based on the 1 % administrative threshold for the total ∆<sup>9</sup>-THC content. The two lone misidentifications were due to the presence of elevated ∆<sup>8</sup>-THC, which highlights the necessity to explore more selective ligands in the future. This study provides the first application of Ag-ligand ion complexation for the identification of marijuana based on a semi-quantitative 1 % decision-point assay, which shows great promise as an alternative method for the rapid identification of marijuana.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":436,"journal":{"name":"Talanta Open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100359"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666831924000730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the strict federal regulations concerning ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC) content for the differentiation of hemp and marijuana outlined in the 2018 Farm Bill, the ability to quickly and reliably differentiate cannabis as marijuana or hemp is crucial within both the seized drug community and hemp industry. This study provides a novel direct mass spectrometry approach for the identification of marijuana using Ag-phosphine ion complexation and a semi-quantitative 1 % decision-point assay. The main constituents of hemp and marijuana, cannabidiol (CBD) and ∆9-THC, are isomeric and cannot be differentiated using soft ionization mass spectrometry techniques alone. However, the incorporation of [Ag(PPh3)(OTf)]2 enables the formation of unique MS/MS product ions at m/z 421/423, m/z 353/355, and m/z 231 for CBD due to differences in binding affinity, allowing CBD to be differentiated from ∆9-THC. Likewise, the isomeric cannabinoid precursors ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (∆9-THCA) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) can be differentiated due to the formation of unique MS/MS product ions at m/z 465/467 and m/z 379/381, which are specific to CBDA. Eight additional cannabinoids were also characterized utilizing the proposed Ag-phosphine ion complexation approach. To reduce the potential for false positives, a more conservative 1 % decision-point assay was developed by fortifying 1 % weight-by-volume ∆9-THC-d9 into methanolic extracts of authentic cannabis plant material, followed by assessing if the total ∆9-THC content (composed of ∆9-THC and ∆9-THCA) was greater than or less than the intensity of the spiked internal standard. When the developed approach was applied to 20 methanolic extracts of authentic cannabis samples with known cannabinoid compositions, 90 % of the samples were correctly identified as marijuana or not marijuana based on the 1 % administrative threshold for the total ∆9-THC content. The two lone misidentifications were due to the presence of elevated ∆8-THC, which highlights the necessity to explore more selective ligands in the future. This study provides the first application of Ag-ligand ion complexation for the identification of marijuana based on a semi-quantitative 1 % decision-point assay, which shows great promise as an alternative method for the rapid identification of marijuana.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用银-膦离子络合和半定量 1% 决定点测定法鉴定大麻
由于 2018 年农业法案对区分大麻和大麻的∆9-四氢大麻酚(∆9-THC)含量做出了严格的联邦规定,因此快速可靠地将大麻区分为大麻或大麻的能力对于缉毒界和大麻行业都至关重要。本研究提供了一种新颖的直接质谱方法,利用银膦离子络合和半定量 1% 决定点测定法来鉴定大麻。大麻和大麻的主要成分大麻二酚(CBD)和∆9-THC 是同分异构体,仅使用软电离质谱技术无法区分。然而,由于结合亲和力的不同,[Ag(PPh3)(OTf)]2 的加入使得大麻二酚在 m/z 421/423、m/z 353/355 和 m/z 231 处形成了独特的 MS/MS 产物离子,从而可以将大麻二酚与∆9-THC 区分开来。同样,由于在 m/z 465/467 和 m/z 379/381 处形成了 CBDA 特有的独特 MS/MS 产物离子,因此可以区分异构大麻素前体∆9-四氢大麻酚酸(∆9-THCA)和大麻二醇酸(CBDA)。另外八种大麻素也采用了拟议的银膦离子复合方法进行表征。为了减少假阳性的可能性,开发了一种更为保守的 1% 决定点检测法,即在正宗大麻植物材料的甲醇提取物中按体积重量添加 1% 的 ∆9-THC-d9 ,然后评估总 ∆9-THC 含量(由 ∆9-THC 和 ∆9-THCA 组成)是否大于或小于加标内标强度。将所开发的方法应用于 20 个已知大麻素成分的真实大麻样品的甲醇提取物时,根据总 ∆9-THC 含量的 1% 管理阈值,90% 的样品被正确识别为大麻或非大麻。仅有的两次错误鉴定是由于∆8-THC 含量升高所致,这表明今后有必要探索更具选择性的配体。本研究首次在半定量 1% 决定点检测的基础上将银配体离子复合物应用于大麻鉴定,作为一种快速鉴定大麻的替代方法,它显示了巨大的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Talanta Open
Talanta Open Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Ultra-sensitive refractive index detection with gold-coated PCF-based SPR sensor High-sensitive ethanol gas sensor using Ag modified ZnO nanosheets High-throughput detection of bottle materials of agave spirits using 3D-printed cartridges for paper-spray ionization mass spectrometry MCM-41 based dispersive micro-solid phase extraction of selected cephalosporin antibiotic residues from water samples prior to liquid chromatographic quantification Bone fragility in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Influence of sex and cardiovascular disease in a pilot study using metabolomics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1