Crafting a jogging-friendly city: Harnessing big data to evaluate the runnability of urban streets

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Transport Geography Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104015
Feng Gao , Xin Chen , Shunyi Liao , Wangyang Chen , Lei Feng , Jiemin Wu , Qingya Zhou , Yuming Zheng , Guanyao Li , Shaoying Li
{"title":"Crafting a jogging-friendly city: Harnessing big data to evaluate the runnability of urban streets","authors":"Feng Gao ,&nbsp;Xin Chen ,&nbsp;Shunyi Liao ,&nbsp;Wangyang Chen ,&nbsp;Lei Feng ,&nbsp;Jiemin Wu ,&nbsp;Qingya Zhou ,&nbsp;Yuming Zheng ,&nbsp;Guanyao Li ,&nbsp;Shaoying Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Jogging, historically marginalized in the realms of urban and transportation strategy since it is not about commuting, is garnering appreciation for its health-related merits. The growing public focus on health underscores the urgent need for planning and infrastructure to support outdoor physical activities, yet current evaluations of urban environments' friendliness toward such activities are insufficient. This investigation unveils a runnability evaluation framework predicated on accessible geospatial big data. Initial steps involved delineating potential metrics from the built environment, pedestrian perceptions, and the natural setting, as informed by literature. This was followed by constructing a backward stepwise regression analysis, utilizing jogging frequency as the response variable against the identified metrics as predictors. The ensuing model retained certain variables, which were then deemed valid metrics, and their regression coefficients were appropriated as weights to compute a runnability index for individual street segments. This framework was applied in Guangzhou, affirming the model's objectivity and validity. The introduced framework furnishes researchers and urban planners with an objective and reproducible tool for the evaluation of runnability and possesses the versatility for an extension to assess walkability and bikeability. This study encourages the attention and support of jogging activities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 104015"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692324002242","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jogging, historically marginalized in the realms of urban and transportation strategy since it is not about commuting, is garnering appreciation for its health-related merits. The growing public focus on health underscores the urgent need for planning and infrastructure to support outdoor physical activities, yet current evaluations of urban environments' friendliness toward such activities are insufficient. This investigation unveils a runnability evaluation framework predicated on accessible geospatial big data. Initial steps involved delineating potential metrics from the built environment, pedestrian perceptions, and the natural setting, as informed by literature. This was followed by constructing a backward stepwise regression analysis, utilizing jogging frequency as the response variable against the identified metrics as predictors. The ensuing model retained certain variables, which were then deemed valid metrics, and their regression coefficients were appropriated as weights to compute a runnability index for individual street segments. This framework was applied in Guangzhou, affirming the model's objectivity and validity. The introduced framework furnishes researchers and urban planners with an objective and reproducible tool for the evaluation of runnability and possesses the versatility for an extension to assess walkability and bikeability. This study encourages the attention and support of jogging activities.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打造适合慢跑的城市:利用大数据评估城市街道的可跑步性
慢跑在城市和交通战略领域一直被边缘化,因为它与通勤无关。公众对健康的日益关注突出表明,迫切需要规划和基础设施来支持户外体育活动,但目前对城市环境是否适合此类活动的评估还不够充分。这项调查揭示了一个以可获取的地理空间大数据为基础的可运行性评估框架。最初的步骤包括根据文献资料,从建筑环境、行人感知和自然环境中划分出潜在的衡量标准。随后,利用慢跑频率作为响应变量,以已确定的指标作为预测变量,构建逆向逐步回归分析。随后的模型保留了某些被视为有效指标的变量,并将其回归系数作为权重,计算出单个路段的可跑性指数。该框架在广州的应用证实了模型的客观性和有效性。所引入的框架为研究人员和城市规划者提供了一个客观、可重复的可运行性评估工具,并具有扩展性,可用于评估步行和自行车的可运行性。这项研究鼓励人们关注和支持慢跑活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
期刊最新文献
Exploring spatiotemporal characteristics of ride-hailing ridership connecting with metro stations: A comparative analysis of holidays, weekdays, and weekends Exploring biases in travel behavior patterns in big passively generated mobile data from 11 U.S. cities Liquefied natural gas trade network changes and its mechanism in the context of the Russia–Ukraine conflict Spatial inferences of visually impaired individuals concerning wayfinding: a case study of Istanbul’s Kadikoy area Comparing accessibility to high-speed rail stations by public transit and cars: A national-scale analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1