Maeve Ryan, John Paul Yun, Niju Thomas, Una Moffatt, Paula Hickey, Grainne O'Malley
{"title":"Evaluation Of Medical Registrar Confidence In Approach To Acute Stroke And Experience Of Stroke Teaching","authors":"Maeve Ryan, John Paul Yun, Niju Thomas, Una Moffatt, Paula Hickey, Grainne O'Malley","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae178.307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The American Heart Association scientific statement (2022) addressing inpatient stroke recommends the delivery of stroke-response training to all hospital staff. While performing a service evaluation on in-patient stroke metrics, we explored the self-perceived confidence levels of medical registrars at this hospital, and whether formal on-site teaching was received. We explored various components including awareness of local stroke protocol and teaching pedagogy. Methods Using Google Forms, a survey was sent to all medical registrars in our hospital. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the confidence levels of various topics. Results The response-rate was 63% (N=12). Fifty percent (N=6) of participants were on Higher Training Schemes while the remaining 50% (N=6) occupied standalone appointments. Most respondents (83%, N=10) reported experience managing an acute stroke as a registrar. Forty-two percent (N=5) of registrars ‘strongly agreed’ they were confident in assessment of acute stroke, with 50% (N=6) ‘agreeing’, and one respondent remaining ‘neutral’ (N=1). Some registrars were unfamiliar with local stroke protocol (23%, N=3). Half of respondents (50%, N=6) reported no formal teaching on acute stroke. Fifty percent (N=6) of registrars reported that most teaching occurred primarily on ward rounds, with 42% (N=5) reported teaching through lectures. The vast majority (83%, N=10) selected simulation as their preferred teaching method. Conclusion While our medical registrars were confident in their ability to assess and manage acute stroke, significant improvements can be made to ensure formal teaching is prioritized. As stroke protocol can change from site-to-site, it is crucial to define expectations and standards for registrars to ensure timely care for patients. There is a clear preference for simulation as a teaching pedagogy, hence we plan on introducing a formal stroke simulation curriculum. Stroke response is a multidisciplinary effort, hence future research directions include exploring stroke training in nurses, junior doctors, and other healthcare professionals.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae178.307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background The American Heart Association scientific statement (2022) addressing inpatient stroke recommends the delivery of stroke-response training to all hospital staff. While performing a service evaluation on in-patient stroke metrics, we explored the self-perceived confidence levels of medical registrars at this hospital, and whether formal on-site teaching was received. We explored various components including awareness of local stroke protocol and teaching pedagogy. Methods Using Google Forms, a survey was sent to all medical registrars in our hospital. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the confidence levels of various topics. Results The response-rate was 63% (N=12). Fifty percent (N=6) of participants were on Higher Training Schemes while the remaining 50% (N=6) occupied standalone appointments. Most respondents (83%, N=10) reported experience managing an acute stroke as a registrar. Forty-two percent (N=5) of registrars ‘strongly agreed’ they were confident in assessment of acute stroke, with 50% (N=6) ‘agreeing’, and one respondent remaining ‘neutral’ (N=1). Some registrars were unfamiliar with local stroke protocol (23%, N=3). Half of respondents (50%, N=6) reported no formal teaching on acute stroke. Fifty percent (N=6) of registrars reported that most teaching occurred primarily on ward rounds, with 42% (N=5) reported teaching through lectures. The vast majority (83%, N=10) selected simulation as their preferred teaching method. Conclusion While our medical registrars were confident in their ability to assess and manage acute stroke, significant improvements can be made to ensure formal teaching is prioritized. As stroke protocol can change from site-to-site, it is crucial to define expectations and standards for registrars to ensure timely care for patients. There is a clear preference for simulation as a teaching pedagogy, hence we plan on introducing a formal stroke simulation curriculum. Stroke response is a multidisciplinary effort, hence future research directions include exploring stroke training in nurses, junior doctors, and other healthcare professionals.
期刊介绍:
Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.