Evaluation Of Medical Registrar Confidence In Approach To Acute Stroke And Experience Of Stroke Teaching

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Age and ageing Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae178.307
Maeve Ryan, John Paul Yun, Niju Thomas, Una Moffatt, Paula Hickey, Grainne O'Malley
{"title":"Evaluation Of Medical Registrar Confidence In Approach To Acute Stroke And Experience Of Stroke Teaching","authors":"Maeve Ryan, John Paul Yun, Niju Thomas, Una Moffatt, Paula Hickey, Grainne O'Malley","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae178.307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The American Heart Association scientific statement (2022) addressing inpatient stroke recommends the delivery of stroke-response training to all hospital staff. While performing a service evaluation on in-patient stroke metrics, we explored the self-perceived confidence levels of medical registrars at this hospital, and whether formal on-site teaching was received. We explored various components including awareness of local stroke protocol and teaching pedagogy. Methods Using Google Forms, a survey was sent to all medical registrars in our hospital. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the confidence levels of various topics. Results The response-rate was 63% (N=12). Fifty percent (N=6) of participants were on Higher Training Schemes while the remaining 50% (N=6) occupied standalone appointments. Most respondents (83%, N=10) reported experience managing an acute stroke as a registrar. Forty-two percent (N=5) of registrars ‘strongly agreed’ they were confident in assessment of acute stroke, with 50% (N=6) ‘agreeing’, and one respondent remaining ‘neutral’ (N=1). Some registrars were unfamiliar with local stroke protocol (23%, N=3). Half of respondents (50%, N=6) reported no formal teaching on acute stroke. Fifty percent (N=6) of registrars reported that most teaching occurred primarily on ward rounds, with 42% (N=5) reported teaching through lectures. The vast majority (83%, N=10) selected simulation as their preferred teaching method. Conclusion While our medical registrars were confident in their ability to assess and manage acute stroke, significant improvements can be made to ensure formal teaching is prioritized. As stroke protocol can change from site-to-site, it is crucial to define expectations and standards for registrars to ensure timely care for patients. There is a clear preference for simulation as a teaching pedagogy, hence we plan on introducing a formal stroke simulation curriculum. Stroke response is a multidisciplinary effort, hence future research directions include exploring stroke training in nurses, junior doctors, and other healthcare professionals.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae178.307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The American Heart Association scientific statement (2022) addressing inpatient stroke recommends the delivery of stroke-response training to all hospital staff. While performing a service evaluation on in-patient stroke metrics, we explored the self-perceived confidence levels of medical registrars at this hospital, and whether formal on-site teaching was received. We explored various components including awareness of local stroke protocol and teaching pedagogy. Methods Using Google Forms, a survey was sent to all medical registrars in our hospital. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the confidence levels of various topics. Results The response-rate was 63% (N=12). Fifty percent (N=6) of participants were on Higher Training Schemes while the remaining 50% (N=6) occupied standalone appointments. Most respondents (83%, N=10) reported experience managing an acute stroke as a registrar. Forty-two percent (N=5) of registrars ‘strongly agreed’ they were confident in assessment of acute stroke, with 50% (N=6) ‘agreeing’, and one respondent remaining ‘neutral’ (N=1). Some registrars were unfamiliar with local stroke protocol (23%, N=3). Half of respondents (50%, N=6) reported no formal teaching on acute stroke. Fifty percent (N=6) of registrars reported that most teaching occurred primarily on ward rounds, with 42% (N=5) reported teaching through lectures. The vast majority (83%, N=10) selected simulation as their preferred teaching method. Conclusion While our medical registrars were confident in their ability to assess and manage acute stroke, significant improvements can be made to ensure formal teaching is prioritized. As stroke protocol can change from site-to-site, it is crucial to define expectations and standards for registrars to ensure timely care for patients. There is a clear preference for simulation as a teaching pedagogy, hence we plan on introducing a formal stroke simulation curriculum. Stroke response is a multidisciplinary effort, hence future research directions include exploring stroke training in nurses, junior doctors, and other healthcare professionals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估注册医师对急性卒中治疗方法的信心和卒中教学经验
背景 美国心脏协会针对住院患者卒中的科学声明(2022 年)建议对所有医院员工进行卒中反应培训。在对住院患者卒中指标进行服务评估时,我们探讨了该医院医疗注册人员的自我认知信心水平,以及是否接受过正规的现场教学。我们探讨的内容包括对当地卒中规范和教学法的认识。方法 使用谷歌表格向本院所有注册医师发送调查问卷。采用 5 点李克特量表评估对不同主题的信心水平。结果 回复率为 63%(12 人)。50%的参与者(6人)参加了高级培训计划,其余50%的参与者(6人)则是独立受聘。大多数受访者(83%,N=10)表示曾作为注册医师管理过急性卒中。42%(5 人)的注册医师 "非常同意 "他们对急性卒中的评估有信心,50%(6 人)"同意",一人保持 "中立"(1 人)。一些注册医师不熟悉当地卒中规范(23%,N=3)。半数受访者(50%,N=6)表示没有接受过有关急性卒中的正规教学。50%(6 人)的注册医师表示大部分教学主要在查房时进行,42%(5 人)表示通过讲座进行教学。绝大多数(83%,10 人)选择模拟教学作为首选教学方法。结论 虽然我们的医学注册医师对自己评估和处理急性卒中的能力很有信心,但仍可做出重大改进,以确保将正规教学放在首位。由于各医疗机构的卒中治疗方案可能会发生变化,因此必须明确注册医师的期望和标准,以确保及时救治患者。模拟作为一种教学方法显然更受欢迎,因此我们计划引入正式的卒中模拟课程。卒中应对是一项多学科工作,因此未来的研究方向包括探索对护士、初级医生和其他医护专业人员的卒中培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of guideline recommendations for older and frail adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus A scoping review of the measurement and analysis of frailty in randomised controlled trials The effect of multidomain lifestyle intervention on health care service use and costs - secondary analyses from the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial Menopause age and type and dementia risk: a pooled analysis of 233 802 women Equality of opportunity for timely dementia diagnosis (EQUATED): a qualitative study of how people from minoritised ethnic groups experience the early symptoms of dementia and seek help
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1