Partnerships Between Faith Communities and the Mental Health Sector: A Scoping Review.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Psychiatric services Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20240077
Lilian G Perez, Cristian Cardenas, Tara Blagg, Eunice C Wong
{"title":"Partnerships Between Faith Communities and the Mental Health Sector: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Lilian G Perez, Cristian Cardenas, Tara Blagg, Eunice C Wong","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Faith communities are increasingly providing services to address the mental health needs of their congregations and communities. However, many feel limited in their capacity to address serious illness and experience challenges to collaborating with the mental health sector. To inform the development of faith community-mental health sector partnerships, the authors conducted a scoping review to assess the characteristics and evidence base of partnership approaches to addressing mental health needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of four databases identified peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2023 on faith community-mental health sector partnerships in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 37 articles representing 32 unique partnerships were reviewed. Most partnerships (N=19) used multicomponent approaches, particularly involving training the faith community (N=18), mental health education for the broader community (N=14), and direct counseling (N=11). Many partnerships (N=14) focused on African American communities. Partnerships that included an evaluation component (N=20) showed promising findings for improving mental health symptoms, mental health literacy, stigma, and referrals, among other outcomes. Several articles reported facilitators (e.g., support from faith leaders and reciprocal relationships and equal power) and barriers (e.g., limited time and funding and differing interests and attitudes) to developing partnerships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight how faith communities can be a critical partner in providing services across the continuum of mental health care and reveal the need for more rigorous evaluations of the effectiveness, feasibility, and sustainability of these partnerships. The results also identify strategies that may facilitate the development and strengthening of future faith community-mental health partnerships.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Faith communities are increasingly providing services to address the mental health needs of their congregations and communities. However, many feel limited in their capacity to address serious illness and experience challenges to collaborating with the mental health sector. To inform the development of faith community-mental health sector partnerships, the authors conducted a scoping review to assess the characteristics and evidence base of partnership approaches to addressing mental health needs.

Methods: A search of four databases identified peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2023 on faith community-mental health sector partnerships in the United States.

Results: In total, 37 articles representing 32 unique partnerships were reviewed. Most partnerships (N=19) used multicomponent approaches, particularly involving training the faith community (N=18), mental health education for the broader community (N=14), and direct counseling (N=11). Many partnerships (N=14) focused on African American communities. Partnerships that included an evaluation component (N=20) showed promising findings for improving mental health symptoms, mental health literacy, stigma, and referrals, among other outcomes. Several articles reported facilitators (e.g., support from faith leaders and reciprocal relationships and equal power) and barriers (e.g., limited time and funding and differing interests and attitudes) to developing partnerships.

Conclusions: The findings highlight how faith communities can be a critical partner in providing services across the continuum of mental health care and reveal the need for more rigorous evaluations of the effectiveness, feasibility, and sustainability of these partnerships. The results also identify strategies that may facilitate the development and strengthening of future faith community-mental health partnerships.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信仰团体与心理健康部门之间的合作关系:范围审查》。
目标:宗教团体越来越多地提供服务,以满足其教众和社区的心理健康需求。然而,许多宗教团体在应对严重疾病方面感到能力有限,在与心理健康部门合作时也遇到了挑战。为了给信仰社区与心理健康部门合作关系的发展提供信息,作者进行了一次范围界定综述,以评估解决心理健康需求的合作方法的特点和证据基础:方法:对四个数据库进行了检索,确定了 2010 年至 2023 年间发表的关于美国宗教社区与精神卫生部门合作关系的同行评审文章:结果:总共审查了 37 篇文章,代表了 32 个独特的合作关系。大多数合作关系(19 篇)都采用了多成分方法,特别是涉及信仰社区培训(18 篇)、更广泛社区的心理健康教育(14 篇)和直接咨询(11 篇)。许多伙伴关系(14 个)的重点是非裔美国人社区。包含评估内容的合作项目(20 个)在改善心理健康症状、提高心理健康素养、污名化和转介等方面取得了可喜的成果。有几篇文章报告了发展合作关系的促进因素(如宗教领袖的支持、互惠关系和平等权力)和障碍(如有限的时间和资金、不同的兴趣和态度):结论:研究结果强调了宗教团体如何能够成为提供精神健康护理服务的重要合作伙伴,并揭示了对这些合作关系的有效性、可行性和可持续性进行更严格评估的必要性。研究结果还指出了一些策略,这些策略可以促进信仰团体与心理健康合作关系的发展和加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
期刊最新文献
Clinic-Level Predictors of Psychotherapy Dosage in the Military Health System. Factor Structure, Reliability, and Construct Validity of the Wellness Inventory. Understanding Involuntary Hospitalization Applications Submitted to an Urban Police Department. Changes in Mental Health Services Use Under the ACA in One State: Role of Mental Health Provider Shortages. Association of Inpatient Occupational Therapy Utilization With Reduced Risk for Psychiatric Readmission Among Veterans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1