What influences post-operative opioid requirements for tibial fractures?

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY British Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1177/20494637241261013
James Zhang, Aaron Limonard, Florence Bradshaw, Ishrat Hussain, Maša Josipović, Matija Krkovic
{"title":"What influences post-operative opioid requirements for tibial fractures?","authors":"James Zhang, Aaron Limonard, Florence Bradshaw, Ishrat Hussain, Maša Josipović, Matija Krkovic","doi":"10.1177/20494637241261013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Currently there are few opioid prescribing guidelines for orthopaedic fractures. Long-term post-surgical analgesia requirements, understandably, vary between orthopaedic cases. Our study aims to provide detailed information to clinicians and policy makers, on the opioid requirement associations for patients sustaining tibial fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reviewed all patients sustaining an isolated tibial fracture at a major trauma centre that were operated on within 1 month of injury, from 2015 to 2022. The total opioid dosage used each month in morphine milligrams equivalents (MME) and the number of days opioids were used each month, within the first-year post-surgery were collected, representing the strength and coverage of opioid analgesia in the post-operative stage, respectively. We compared opioid strength and coverage requirements with types of definitive fracture fixations, location, fracture type and concurrent patient medical comorbidities to assess for any trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1814 patients sustaining a combined of 1970 fractures were included in the study. Tibial plateau fractures had the highest opioid strength and coverage requirements in each month and the entire year (<i>p</i> < .05). Across all fracture locations, Ex Fix frame showed higher opioid strength and coverage requirements compared to both IM nailing and plate ORIF. With regard to opioid coverage in the presence of specific comorbidities, only chronic kidney disease (quotient: 1.37, 95% Confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.19-1.55, <i>p</i> = .002) and hypertension (quotient: 1.34, 95%CI = 1.14-1.53, <i>p</i> = .009) showed significance at the 1-year overall level. For opioid strength, Chronic Kidney Disease (quotient: 1.72, 95%CI = 1.41-2.03 <i>p</i> = .005) and COPD (quotient: 1.90, 95%CI = 1.44-2.36, <i>p</i> = .014), show significance at the 1-year overall level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study details opioid requirements post-surgery amongst tibial fractures with subgroup analysis assessing opioid needs amongst specific fracture locations, types, surgical techniques and medical comorbidities. This framework aids clinicians in anticipating rehabilitation and assists in risk stratifying patients at injury onset.</p>","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637241261013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Currently there are few opioid prescribing guidelines for orthopaedic fractures. Long-term post-surgical analgesia requirements, understandably, vary between orthopaedic cases. Our study aims to provide detailed information to clinicians and policy makers, on the opioid requirement associations for patients sustaining tibial fractures.

Methods: This study reviewed all patients sustaining an isolated tibial fracture at a major trauma centre that were operated on within 1 month of injury, from 2015 to 2022. The total opioid dosage used each month in morphine milligrams equivalents (MME) and the number of days opioids were used each month, within the first-year post-surgery were collected, representing the strength and coverage of opioid analgesia in the post-operative stage, respectively. We compared opioid strength and coverage requirements with types of definitive fracture fixations, location, fracture type and concurrent patient medical comorbidities to assess for any trends.

Results: A total of 1814 patients sustaining a combined of 1970 fractures were included in the study. Tibial plateau fractures had the highest opioid strength and coverage requirements in each month and the entire year (p < .05). Across all fracture locations, Ex Fix frame showed higher opioid strength and coverage requirements compared to both IM nailing and plate ORIF. With regard to opioid coverage in the presence of specific comorbidities, only chronic kidney disease (quotient: 1.37, 95% Confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.19-1.55, p = .002) and hypertension (quotient: 1.34, 95%CI = 1.14-1.53, p = .009) showed significance at the 1-year overall level. For opioid strength, Chronic Kidney Disease (quotient: 1.72, 95%CI = 1.41-2.03 p = .005) and COPD (quotient: 1.90, 95%CI = 1.44-2.36, p = .014), show significance at the 1-year overall level.

Conclusion: Our study details opioid requirements post-surgery amongst tibial fractures with subgroup analysis assessing opioid needs amongst specific fracture locations, types, surgical techniques and medical comorbidities. This framework aids clinicians in anticipating rehabilitation and assists in risk stratifying patients at injury onset.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是什么影响了胫骨骨折术后对阿片类药物的需求?
导言:目前,几乎没有针对骨科骨折的阿片类药物处方指南。可以理解的是,不同骨科病例的术后长期镇痛需求各不相同。我们的研究旨在为临床医生和政策制定者提供有关胫骨骨折患者阿片类药物需求关联的详细信息:本研究回顾了 2015 年至 2022 年期间在一家大型创伤中心接受手术的所有在受伤后 1 个月内发生孤立性胫骨骨折的患者。收集了术后第一年内每月阿片类药物的总用量(吗啡毫克当量)和每月使用阿片类药物的天数,分别代表术后阶段阿片类药物镇痛的强度和覆盖范围。我们将阿片类药物的使用强度和覆盖范围要求与最终骨折固定的类型、位置、骨折类型和患者的并发症进行了比较,以评估任何趋势:研究共纳入了1814名骨折患者,总计1970例。胫骨平台骨折患者每月和全年的阿片类药物剂量和覆盖范围需求最高(p < .05)。在所有骨折部位,Ex Fix固定架与IM钉和钢板ORIF相比,都显示出更高的阿片类药物强度和覆盖需求。关于存在特定合并症时的阿片类药物覆盖率,只有慢性肾病(商数:1.37,95% 置信区间 [95%CI] = 1.19-1.55,p = .002)和高血压(商数:1.34,95%CI = 1.14-1.53,p = .009)在 1 年总体水平上显示出显著性。慢性肾脏病(商数:1.72,95%CI = 1.41-2.03,p = .005)和慢性阻塞性肺病(商数:1.90,95%CI = 1.44-2.36,p = .014)的阿片类药物强度在 1 年总体水平上显示出显著性:我们的研究详细介绍了胫骨骨折患者手术后对阿片类药物的需求,并通过亚组分析评估了特定骨折部位、类型、手术技术和合并症对阿片类药物的需求。这一框架有助于临床医生预测康复情况,并在患者受伤初期对其进行风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Pain
British Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.
期刊最新文献
What influences post-operative opioid requirements for tibial fractures? Botulinum toxin: Should we reconsider its place in the treatment of neuropathic pain? Experience of compassion-based practice in mindfulness for health for individuals with persistent pain. Prehabilitation: The underutilised weapon for chronic pain management. The interaction between psychological factors and conditioned pain modulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1