Laparoscopic colectomy for patients with poor American Society of Anesthesiology classifications

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1111/ases.13393
Keisuke Noda, Takashi Nonaka, Tetsuro Tominaga, Yuma Takamura, Kaido Oishi, Shintaro Hashimoto, Toshio Shiraishi, Rika Ono, Mitsutoshi Ishii, Makoto Hisanaga, Hiroaki Takeshita, Hidetoshi Fukuoka, Shosaburo Oyama, Kazuhide Ishimaru, Masaki Kunizaki, Terumitsu Sawai, Keitaro Matsumoto
{"title":"Laparoscopic colectomy for patients with poor American Society of Anesthesiology classifications","authors":"Keisuke Noda,&nbsp;Takashi Nonaka,&nbsp;Tetsuro Tominaga,&nbsp;Yuma Takamura,&nbsp;Kaido Oishi,&nbsp;Shintaro Hashimoto,&nbsp;Toshio Shiraishi,&nbsp;Rika Ono,&nbsp;Mitsutoshi Ishii,&nbsp;Makoto Hisanaga,&nbsp;Hiroaki Takeshita,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Fukuoka,&nbsp;Shosaburo Oyama,&nbsp;Kazuhide Ishimaru,&nbsp;Masaki Kunizaki,&nbsp;Terumitsu Sawai,&nbsp;Keitaro Matsumoto","doi":"10.1111/ases.13393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification is used to assess the fitness of a patient for surgery. Whether laparoscopic surgery is appropriate for colorectal cancer patients with poor ASA performance status (PS) remains unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Among 4585 patients who underwent colorectal surgery between 2016 and 2023, this study retrospectively reviewed all 458 patients with ASA-PS ≥3. Patients were divided into two groups: patients treated by open surgery (O group, <i>n</i> = 80); and patients treated by laparoscopic surgery (L group, <i>n</i> = 378). We investigated the impact of surgical approach on postoperative complications in patients with colorectal cancer and ASA-PS ≥3.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Operation time was longer (170 min vs. 233 min, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), blood loss was less (156 mL vs. 23 mL, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), postoperative complications were less frequent (40.0% vs. 25.1%, <i>p</i> = .008), and hospital stay was shorter (23 days vs. 14 days, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) in L group. Univariate analysis revealed rectal cancer, open surgery, longer operation time, and blood loss as factors significantly associated with postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis revealed open surgery (odds ratio [OR] 2.100, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.164–3.788; <i>p</i> = .013) and longer operation time (OR 1.747, 95% CI 1.098–2.778; <i>p</i> = .018) as independent predictors of postoperative complications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Laparoscopic surgery provides favorable outcomes for colorectal cancer patients with poor ASA-PS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.13393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification is used to assess the fitness of a patient for surgery. Whether laparoscopic surgery is appropriate for colorectal cancer patients with poor ASA performance status (PS) remains unclear.

Methods

Among 4585 patients who underwent colorectal surgery between 2016 and 2023, this study retrospectively reviewed all 458 patients with ASA-PS ≥3. Patients were divided into two groups: patients treated by open surgery (O group, n = 80); and patients treated by laparoscopic surgery (L group, n = 378). We investigated the impact of surgical approach on postoperative complications in patients with colorectal cancer and ASA-PS ≥3.

Results

Operation time was longer (170 min vs. 233 min, p < .001), blood loss was less (156 mL vs. 23 mL, p < .001), postoperative complications were less frequent (40.0% vs. 25.1%, p = .008), and hospital stay was shorter (23 days vs. 14 days, p < .001) in L group. Univariate analysis revealed rectal cancer, open surgery, longer operation time, and blood loss as factors significantly associated with postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis revealed open surgery (odds ratio [OR] 2.100, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.164–3.788; p = .013) and longer operation time (OR 1.747, 95% CI 1.098–2.778; p = .018) as independent predictors of postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery provides favorable outcomes for colorectal cancer patients with poor ASA-PS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为美国麻醉学会分类不佳的患者实施腹腔镜结肠切除术。
导言:美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分类用于评估患者是否适合手术。ASA表现状态(PS)较差的结直肠癌患者是否适合腹腔镜手术,目前仍不清楚:在2016年至2023年期间接受结直肠手术的4585名患者中,本研究对所有458名ASA-PS≥3的患者进行了回顾性研究。患者被分为两组:接受开腹手术治疗的患者(O 组,n = 80);接受腹腔镜手术治疗的患者(L 组,n = 378)。我们研究了手术方式对ASA-PS≥3的结直肠癌患者术后并发症的影响:结果:手术时间更长(170 分钟 vs. 233 分钟,P 结论:腹腔镜手术为结肠癌患者提供了良好的术后并发症:腹腔镜手术为 ASA-PS 较差的结直肠癌患者提供了良好的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
Practice guidelines on endoscopic surgery for qualified surgeons by the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system: Esophagus Biliopancreatic limb obstruction after one-anastomosis gastric bypass; a very rare and fatal event: A case report and literature review Correlation between forceps grasp count and skill proficiency in single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure: A retrospective single-center study Distal preservation and retrograde resection of the anterior vaginal wall in female robot-assisted radical cystectomy Isolated esophageal hiatal hernia of the colon: A case report and review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1