Effectiveness of intensive motor learning approaches from working on a vertical surface on hemiplegic children's upper limb motor skills, a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2407505
Omnya Samy A Ghoneim, Dina Othman Shokri Morsi Galal, Doha H Al-Afify, Mariam Hossam El Ebrashy, Fatma S Zidan, Rasha Atef Saad
{"title":"Effectiveness of intensive motor learning approaches from working on a vertical surface on hemiplegic children's upper limb motor skills, a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Omnya Samy A Ghoneim, Dina Othman Shokri Morsi Galal, Doha H Al-Afify, Mariam Hossam El Ebrashy, Fatma S Zidan, Rasha Atef Saad","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2407505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compares the effect of intensive motor learning approaches on improving the quality of upper extremity skills in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) by working on vertical surfaces versus horizontal surfaces during rehabilitation sessions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty UCP children of both sexes were randomized into two equal groups. All participants received 60 min of intensive motor learning approaches three days/week for three successive months. These approaches included constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), in which children wore a splint or sling on the unaffected upper limb, as well as hand-arm bimanual intensive training (HABIT) that requires the use of both hands during specific play-based activities. The control group received training on a horizontal surface while the child sat in front of an elbow-height table while the study group (vertical surface training) sat or stood in front of a wall/mirror/board. The task requirements were graded to ensure success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences were detected between the mean values of post-treatment of all scorers, with a greater percentage of improvement in favor of the study group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that working on a vertical surface improved upper limb motor skills more significantly than working on a horizontal surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2407505","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study compares the effect of intensive motor learning approaches on improving the quality of upper extremity skills in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) by working on vertical surfaces versus horizontal surfaces during rehabilitation sessions.

Materials and methods: Forty UCP children of both sexes were randomized into two equal groups. All participants received 60 min of intensive motor learning approaches three days/week for three successive months. These approaches included constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), in which children wore a splint or sling on the unaffected upper limb, as well as hand-arm bimanual intensive training (HABIT) that requires the use of both hands during specific play-based activities. The control group received training on a horizontal surface while the child sat in front of an elbow-height table while the study group (vertical surface training) sat or stood in front of a wall/mirror/board. The task requirements were graded to ensure success.

Results: Statistically significant differences were detected between the mean values of post-treatment of all scorers, with a greater percentage of improvement in favor of the study group.

Conclusions: This study revealed that working on a vertical surface improved upper limb motor skills more significantly than working on a horizontal surface.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项随机对照试验:在垂直面上进行强化运动学习对偏瘫儿童上肢运动技能的影响。
目的:本研究比较了强化运动学习方法对单侧脑瘫(UCP)儿童上肢技能质量的改善效果,即在康复训练过程中在垂直表面和水平表面上进行训练:将 40 名单侧脑瘫儿童随机分为两组。所有参与者在连续三个月内接受每周三天、每次 60 分钟的强化运动学习方法。这些方法包括约束诱导运动疗法(CIMT),即儿童在未受影响的上肢上佩戴夹板或吊带,以及手臂双臂强化训练(HABIT),要求在特定的游戏活动中使用双手。对照组在水平面上接受训练,孩子坐在肘高的桌子前,而研究组(垂直面训练)则坐在或站在墙/镜子/板前。任务要求分等级,以确保成功:结果:所有评分者治疗后的平均值之间存在明显的统计学差异,研究组的改善幅度更大:本研究表明,在垂直面上工作比在水平面上工作对上肢运动技能的提高更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of observation-based tools for assessing use of the upper limb in activities. The healthcare experience of young stroke survivors: an interpretative phenomenological study. Clinician perspectives of engaging parents in behavioural interventions: a thematic analysis in Aotearoa New Zealand. Effects of inspiratory muscle training on pulmonary function, diaphragmatic thickness, balance and exercise capacity in people after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effectiveness of intensive motor learning approaches from working on a vertical surface on hemiplegic children's upper limb motor skills, a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1