Intraspinal microstimulation of the ventral horn has therapeutically relevant cross-modal effects on nociception.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain communications Pub Date : 2024-08-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcae280
Maria F Bandres, Jefferson L Gomes, Jacob Graves McPherson
{"title":"Intraspinal microstimulation of the ventral horn has therapeutically relevant cross-modal effects on nociception.","authors":"Maria F Bandres, Jefferson L Gomes, Jacob Graves McPherson","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcae280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electrical stimulation of spinal networks below a spinal cord injury is a promising approach to restore functions compromised by inadequate and/or inappropriate neural drive. The most translationally successful examples are paradigms intended to increase neural transmission in weakened yet spared descending motor pathways and spinal motoneurons rendered dormant after being severed from their inputs by lesion. Less well understood is whether spinal stimulation is also capable of reducing neural transmission in pathways made pathologically overactive by spinal cord injury. Debilitating spasms, spasticity and neuropathic pain are all common manifestations of hyperexcitable spinal responses to sensory feedback. Whereas spasms and spasticity can often be managed pharmacologically, spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain is notoriously medically refractory. Interestingly, however, spinal stimulation is a clinically available option for ameliorating neuropathic pain arising from aetiologies other than spinal cord injury, and the limited evidence available to date suggests that it holds considerable promise for reducing spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain, as well. Spinal stimulation for pain amelioration has traditionally been assumed to modulate sensorimotor networks overlapping with those engaged by spinal stimulation for rehabilitation of movement impairments. Thus, we hypothesize that spinal stimulation intended to increase the ability to move voluntarily may simultaneously reduce transmission in spinal pain pathways. To test this hypothesis, we coupled a rat model of incomplete thoracic spinal cord injury, which results in moderate to severe bilateral movement impairments and spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain, with <i>in vivo</i> electrophysiological measures of neural transmission in networks of spinal neurons integral to the development and persistence of the neuropathic pain state. We find that when intraspinal microstimulation is delivered to the ventral horn with the intent of enhancing voluntary movement, transmission through nociceptive specific and wide dynamic range neurons is significantly depressed in response to pain-related sensory feedback. By comparison, spinal responsiveness to non-pain-related sensory feedback is largely preserved. These results suggest that spinal stimulation paradigms could be intentionally designed to afford multi-modal therapeutic benefits, directly addressing the diverse, intersectional rehabilitation goals of people living with spinal cord injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of spinal networks below a spinal cord injury is a promising approach to restore functions compromised by inadequate and/or inappropriate neural drive. The most translationally successful examples are paradigms intended to increase neural transmission in weakened yet spared descending motor pathways and spinal motoneurons rendered dormant after being severed from their inputs by lesion. Less well understood is whether spinal stimulation is also capable of reducing neural transmission in pathways made pathologically overactive by spinal cord injury. Debilitating spasms, spasticity and neuropathic pain are all common manifestations of hyperexcitable spinal responses to sensory feedback. Whereas spasms and spasticity can often be managed pharmacologically, spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain is notoriously medically refractory. Interestingly, however, spinal stimulation is a clinically available option for ameliorating neuropathic pain arising from aetiologies other than spinal cord injury, and the limited evidence available to date suggests that it holds considerable promise for reducing spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain, as well. Spinal stimulation for pain amelioration has traditionally been assumed to modulate sensorimotor networks overlapping with those engaged by spinal stimulation for rehabilitation of movement impairments. Thus, we hypothesize that spinal stimulation intended to increase the ability to move voluntarily may simultaneously reduce transmission in spinal pain pathways. To test this hypothesis, we coupled a rat model of incomplete thoracic spinal cord injury, which results in moderate to severe bilateral movement impairments and spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain, with in vivo electrophysiological measures of neural transmission in networks of spinal neurons integral to the development and persistence of the neuropathic pain state. We find that when intraspinal microstimulation is delivered to the ventral horn with the intent of enhancing voluntary movement, transmission through nociceptive specific and wide dynamic range neurons is significantly depressed in response to pain-related sensory feedback. By comparison, spinal responsiveness to non-pain-related sensory feedback is largely preserved. These results suggest that spinal stimulation paradigms could be intentionally designed to afford multi-modal therapeutic benefits, directly addressing the diverse, intersectional rehabilitation goals of people living with spinal cord injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹侧角的脊髓内微刺激对痛觉具有跨模式的治疗效果。
对脊髓损伤下方的脊髓网络进行电刺激,是恢复因神经驱动不足和/或不当而受损功能的一种很有前景的方法。最成功的转化范例是旨在增加衰弱但幸免于难的下行运动通路的神经传导,以及因病变切断其输入而处于休眠状态的脊髓运动神经元。人们对脊髓刺激是否也能减少因脊髓损伤而过度活跃的病理通路的神经传递了解较少。使人衰弱的痉挛、痉挛和神经性疼痛都是脊髓对感觉反馈过度兴奋的常见表现。痉挛和痉挛通常可以通过药物治疗,而与脊髓损伤相关的神经性疼痛则是众所周知的难治性疾病。然而,有趣的是,脊髓刺激是临床上可用于改善脊髓损伤以外病因引起的神经病理性疼痛的一种选择,而且迄今为止有限的证据表明,脊髓刺激在减轻脊髓损伤相关神经病理性疼痛方面也具有相当大的前景。传统上,人们认为脊髓刺激缓解疼痛所调节的感觉运动网络与脊髓刺激康复运动障碍所调节的感觉运动网络是重叠的。因此,我们假设,旨在提高自主运动能力的脊髓刺激可能会同时减少脊髓疼痛通路的传递。为了验证这一假设,我们将导致中度至重度双侧运动障碍和脊髓损伤相关神经病理性疼痛的不完全胸段脊髓损伤大鼠模型与脊髓神经元网络中与神经病理性疼痛状态的发展和持续密不可分的神经传递的体内电生理测量相结合。我们发现,当脊髓内微刺激被传递到腹侧角以增强自主运动时,通过痛觉特异性神经元和宽动态范围神经元的传导会因疼痛相关的感觉反馈而受到显著抑制。相比之下,脊髓对非疼痛相关感觉反馈的反应能力则基本保持不变。这些结果表明,脊髓刺激范式可以有意识地设计成提供多模式治疗益处,直接解决脊髓损伤患者多样化、交叉性的康复目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cerebellar activity in hemi-parkinsonian rats during volitional gait and freezing. Cerebellar activity in PINK1 knockout rats during volitional gait. Enhanced MRI-based brain tumour classification with a novel Pix2pix generative adversarial network augmentation framework. The spine-brain axis: is spinal anatomy associated with brain volume? A glycan biomarker predicts cognitive decline in amyloid- and tau-negative patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1