B-010 Intercomparison Study of Methods between Atellica Solution® and CI® Analyzers for Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.374
S Garcia-Valdecasas, S Lapeña-Garcia, M Ruiz-Alvarez, T Costales-Lucia, A Moreno-Romero, S Molina-Blas, M Barrionuevo-Gonzalez
{"title":"B-010 Intercomparison Study of Methods between Atellica Solution® and CI® Analyzers for Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride","authors":"S Garcia-Valdecasas, S Lapeña-Garcia, M Ruiz-Alvarez, T Costales-Lucia, A Moreno-Romero, S Molina-Blas, M Barrionuevo-Gonzalez","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Method verification is an essential analysis routinely conducted in accredited Clinical Laboratories whenever a change of method or instrument for a specific analyte is desired. Objectives The aim of the study is to verify that the results measured by the Atellica Solution® analyzer (Siemens) and the new CI® analyzer (Siemens) for Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride are interchangeable. Methods To conduct the intercomparison study of Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride, the techniques were properly calibrated and controlled on both analyzers. For each assay, 40 patient samples were selected, covering the entire measurement range, and analyzed by both instruments. To determine the degree of agreement between the instruments, a Bland Altman analysis of mean differences and a Passing Bablok regression were performed. Statistics are expressed with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). The evaluation of results was carried out using the statistical program Method Validator. Results In both the Bland-Altman and Passing Bablok regression analyses, a slight constant systematic error was detected for all three assays, as the 95% confidence interval of the observed mean difference and the 95% confidence interval of the intercept of the regression line do not include zero. No systematic proportional differences were observed based on the slope, as the 95% confidence interval includes the value one Conclusions The small constant systematic differences found in the analyses should be re-evaluated after performing a new calibration of the methods. In none of the cases are the differences clinically significant, as they do not exceed the total error established in our quality specification. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Atellica Solution® and CI 1900® analyzers are interchangeable for Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride assays","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.374","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Method verification is an essential analysis routinely conducted in accredited Clinical Laboratories whenever a change of method or instrument for a specific analyte is desired. Objectives The aim of the study is to verify that the results measured by the Atellica Solution® analyzer (Siemens) and the new CI® analyzer (Siemens) for Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride are interchangeable. Methods To conduct the intercomparison study of Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride, the techniques were properly calibrated and controlled on both analyzers. For each assay, 40 patient samples were selected, covering the entire measurement range, and analyzed by both instruments. To determine the degree of agreement between the instruments, a Bland Altman analysis of mean differences and a Passing Bablok regression were performed. Statistics are expressed with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). The evaluation of results was carried out using the statistical program Method Validator. Results In both the Bland-Altman and Passing Bablok regression analyses, a slight constant systematic error was detected for all three assays, as the 95% confidence interval of the observed mean difference and the 95% confidence interval of the intercept of the regression line do not include zero. No systematic proportional differences were observed based on the slope, as the 95% confidence interval includes the value one Conclusions The small constant systematic differences found in the analyses should be re-evaluated after performing a new calibration of the methods. In none of the cases are the differences clinically significant, as they do not exceed the total error established in our quality specification. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Atellica Solution® and CI 1900® analyzers are interchangeable for Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride assays
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
B-010 Atellica Solution® 和 CI® 分析仪之间钠、钾和氯化物分析方法的相互比较研究
背景 每当需要对特定分析物更换方法或仪器时,方法验证是经认可的临床实验室例行进行的一项重要分析。研究目的 验证 Atellica Solution® 分析仪(西门子)和新型 CI® 分析仪(西门子)测量钠、钾和氯化物的结果是否可以互换。方法 为了进行钠、钾和氯化物的相互比较研究,对两台分析仪的技术进行了适当的校准和控制。每种检测方法都选择了 40 份病人样本,涵盖了整个测量范围,并由两种仪器进行分析。为了确定仪器之间的一致程度,对平均差进行了布兰德-阿尔特曼分析,并进行了帕森-巴布洛克回归分析。统计数据以 95% 的置信区间 (CI) 表示。结果评估使用统计程序 Method Validator 进行。结果 在 Bland-Altman 和 Passing Bablok 回归分析中,由于观察到的平均差的 95% 置信区间和回归线截距的 95% 置信区间不包括零,因此所有三种检测方法都检测到了轻微的恒定系统误差。结论 分析中发现的微小恒定系统性差异应在对方法进行新的校准后重新评估。这些差异都没有临床意义,因为它们都没有超过我们的质量规范中规定的总误差。因此,可以得出结论,Atellica Solution® 和 CI 1900® 分析仪在钠、钾和氯化物检测方面是可以互换的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Six-Color Multiplex Digital PCR Assays for Comprehensive Screening and Identification of Multiple Driver Mutations Associated with Pancreatic Carcinogenesis. Cell-Free DNA Profiling for Prenatal Screening and Oncology-Directed Liquid Biopsy. Methods to Improve Confidence in the Accuracy of Molecular Testing for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Development of a Novel Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Multiple Reaction Monitoring (LC-MRM) Assay for the Quantification of Neurofilament Light Chain in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Comparison with Ultra-Sensitive Immunoassay: A Step toward Standardization. Towards Clinical Integration of Deep Learning-Based Classification of Urinary Sediment Particles from Digital Microscopy Images: A Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1