Single-port robot-assisted nephroureterectomy via a supine anterior approach: step-by-step technique

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BJU International Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1111/bju.16537
Alessandro Izzo, Gianluca Spena, Giovanni Grimaldi, Giuseppe Quarto, Luigi Castaldo, Raffaele Muscariello, Dario Franzese, Francesco Passaro, Riccardo Autorino, Antonio Tufano, Sisto Perdonà
{"title":"Single-port robot-assisted nephroureterectomy via a supine anterior approach: step-by-step technique","authors":"Alessandro Izzo,&nbsp;Gianluca Spena,&nbsp;Giovanni Grimaldi,&nbsp;Giuseppe Quarto,&nbsp;Luigi Castaldo,&nbsp;Raffaele Muscariello,&nbsp;Dario Franzese,&nbsp;Francesco Passaro,&nbsp;Riccardo Autorino,&nbsp;Antonio Tufano,&nbsp;Sisto Perdonà","doi":"10.1111/bju.16537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Radical nephroureterectomy (NU) remains the standard of care for treating non metastatic high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) [<span>1</span>]. Robot-assisted NU (RANU) has gained wider adoption over the past few years, especially after the introduction of the da Vinci<sup>®</sup> (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) Xi robotic platform that facilitates multi-quadrant surgical procedures [<span>2</span>]. However, the Xi RANU is mostly performed via a transperitoneal approach [<span>3</span>].</p><p>The da Vinci Single Port System (da Vinci SP<sup>®</sup>; Intuitive Surgical Inc.) was introduced to the USA market in 2018 [<span>4</span>] and recently received European approval. This novel robotic platform has renewed interest in the retroperitoneal approach for kidney procedures, including RANU [<span>5</span>]. Advantages over multiport systems include smaller incisions, better cosmetic outcomes, reduced surgical trauma, less pain, and faster recovery.</p><p>Only very few cases of SP RANU have been reported to date [<span>6, 7</span>]. Here, we describe the detailed surgical technique of SP RANU, demonstrating its feasibility and ease of implementation in a high-volume robotic centre.</p><p>Our edited video (Video S1) shows a RANU case performed using the da Vinci SP in May 2024 at our institution. A 70-year-old male with a 2.8-cm pelvis (PUJ) tumour, a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6, and a body mass index of 29.32 kg/m<sup>2</sup> was selected. Recorded surgical outcomes included: docking and console time, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, haemoglobin, creatinine, pain scores at discharge assessed by using a numerical rating scale, and length of stay.</p><p>The incision and docking time was 14 min, and console time was 105 min, resulting in a total operative time of 119 min. The intraoperative EBL was 100 mL. No intra- or postoperative complications were reported. The patient was discharged on the first postoperative day. The haemoglobin level at discharge was 121 g/L compared to the preoperative value of 124 g/L. The creatinine level at discharge was 135.25 μmol/L (1.53 mg/dL), compared to the preoperative creatinine level of 83.98 μmol/L (0.95 mg/dL). The pain score was 1.2 (out of 10) at the time of discharge. No narcotics were used in postoperative care.</p><p>Pathology showed a high-grade urothelial cancer with negative margins.</p><p>To date, at our Institution, we have performed eight RANU procedures using the new da Vinci SP platform. In our series of eight patients, the postoperative outcomes were notably favourable. The average EBL during surgery was 130 mL, with no patient requiring a blood transfusion. The mean console time was 108 min and a bladder-cuff resection was performed in all cases. Additionally, three patients underwent locoregional lymph node dissection (LND), none of whom developed a lymphocele. No major complications were recorded, and all patients were discharged on the first postoperative day with a Foley catheter, which was removed after 7 days following cystography. No abdominal drain was placed in any patient. Pathological reports confirmed that no patients had positive surgical margins.</p><p>A SP RANU is a safe and reproducible multi-quadrant procedure that can be performed by using a lower anterior retroperitoneal approach.</p><p>The Xi RANU is an established minimally invasive treatment for UTUC. While a retroperitoneal approach is explored for multiport RANU, it is mainly performed transperitoneally due to technical multiport constraints. The Xi procedure still faces internal clashing and suboptimal working angles moving from the kidney to the bladder. The SP platform, designed for narrow spaces like the retroperitoneum and pelvis and allowing multi-quadrant surgery could optimise RANU.</p><p>We used the novel supine anterior retroperitoneal access technique by Pellegrino et al. [<span>5</span>], which enables the maintenance of the patient in a supine position throughout, avoiding repositioning and re-docking. This allowed rapid, precise Access Port placement. Transitioning from the renal quadrant to the bladder cuff was streamlined and efficient, utilising the advanced functionality of the da Vinci SP system's ‘Relocate Mode’, with bed-side assistance optimising instrument settings during this phase.</p><p>To our knowledge, this represents the first reported European case of RANU using a retroperitoneal approach with the da Vinci SP robotic platform. In our experience, the SP platform overcomes limitations in confined surgical spaces such as the retroperitoneum. Postoperative pain was minimal, with no need for narcotics. The lower reported pain scores in retroperitoneal surgery, compared to transperitoneal, are likely due to avoiding peritoneal membrane irritation, which is highly innervated and sensitive to distension caused by pneumoperitoneum, and surgical incisions. Additional benefits include faster recovery and decrease surgical trauma. From a surgical perspective, the retroperitoneal approach utilising the SP platform presents notable benefits, including enhanced control of hilar structures, reduced blood loss, fewer surgical complications, and diminished postoperative discomfort. Evaluating the potential cost reduction associated with shorter hospital stays warrant further investigation.</p><p>In our opinion, LND appears feasible with this approach, offering easy access to locoregional lymph nodes, including the iliac, para-aortic, para-caval, and hilar nodes. It may be advisable to avoid this technique in patients with extensive lymph node involvement due to the limited operative field and potential difficulties in managing the aspiration system.</p><p>This technique has not shown significant limitations. However, in obese patients, the procedure becomes more challenging due to the excess fat, which further reduces the already limited operative field. Retroperitoneal adhesions caused by inflammation, such as in patients with a history of UTIs or pyelonephritis related to stones, could present the greatest limitation due to the difficulties in creating the retro-pneumoperitoneum.</p><p>Here, we detailed the surgical steps and showed the safety and feasibility of SP RANU procedure via a supine anterior retroperitoneal access. This procedure offers key advantages for both the surgeon (allowing a completely retroperitoneal multi-quadrant surgery) and, above all, the patient (more natural position during the surgery, minimising skin incision and postoperative pain, shortening the hospitalisation time).</p><p>As the SP system is increasingly adopted worldwide, SP RANU has to potential to become a competitive player in the surgical armamentarium for the treatment of UTUC. A comparative analysis with multiport Xi RANU should be the focus of future clinical research.</p><p>The authors declare that they have no disclosure of interest.</p><p>https://zenodo.org/records/13767816.</p>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"135 3","pages":"535-538"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bju.16537","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.16537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radical nephroureterectomy (NU) remains the standard of care for treating non metastatic high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) [1]. Robot-assisted NU (RANU) has gained wider adoption over the past few years, especially after the introduction of the da Vinci® (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) Xi robotic platform that facilitates multi-quadrant surgical procedures [2]. However, the Xi RANU is mostly performed via a transperitoneal approach [3].

The da Vinci Single Port System (da Vinci SP®; Intuitive Surgical Inc.) was introduced to the USA market in 2018 [4] and recently received European approval. This novel robotic platform has renewed interest in the retroperitoneal approach for kidney procedures, including RANU [5]. Advantages over multiport systems include smaller incisions, better cosmetic outcomes, reduced surgical trauma, less pain, and faster recovery.

Only very few cases of SP RANU have been reported to date [6, 7]. Here, we describe the detailed surgical technique of SP RANU, demonstrating its feasibility and ease of implementation in a high-volume robotic centre.

Our edited video (Video S1) shows a RANU case performed using the da Vinci SP in May 2024 at our institution. A 70-year-old male with a 2.8-cm pelvis (PUJ) tumour, a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6, and a body mass index of 29.32 kg/m2 was selected. Recorded surgical outcomes included: docking and console time, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, haemoglobin, creatinine, pain scores at discharge assessed by using a numerical rating scale, and length of stay.

The incision and docking time was 14 min, and console time was 105 min, resulting in a total operative time of 119 min. The intraoperative EBL was 100 mL. No intra- or postoperative complications were reported. The patient was discharged on the first postoperative day. The haemoglobin level at discharge was 121 g/L compared to the preoperative value of 124 g/L. The creatinine level at discharge was 135.25 μmol/L (1.53 mg/dL), compared to the preoperative creatinine level of 83.98 μmol/L (0.95 mg/dL). The pain score was 1.2 (out of 10) at the time of discharge. No narcotics were used in postoperative care.

Pathology showed a high-grade urothelial cancer with negative margins.

To date, at our Institution, we have performed eight RANU procedures using the new da Vinci SP platform. In our series of eight patients, the postoperative outcomes were notably favourable. The average EBL during surgery was 130 mL, with no patient requiring a blood transfusion. The mean console time was 108 min and a bladder-cuff resection was performed in all cases. Additionally, three patients underwent locoregional lymph node dissection (LND), none of whom developed a lymphocele. No major complications were recorded, and all patients were discharged on the first postoperative day with a Foley catheter, which was removed after 7 days following cystography. No abdominal drain was placed in any patient. Pathological reports confirmed that no patients had positive surgical margins.

A SP RANU is a safe and reproducible multi-quadrant procedure that can be performed by using a lower anterior retroperitoneal approach.

The Xi RANU is an established minimally invasive treatment for UTUC. While a retroperitoneal approach is explored for multiport RANU, it is mainly performed transperitoneally due to technical multiport constraints. The Xi procedure still faces internal clashing and suboptimal working angles moving from the kidney to the bladder. The SP platform, designed for narrow spaces like the retroperitoneum and pelvis and allowing multi-quadrant surgery could optimise RANU.

We used the novel supine anterior retroperitoneal access technique by Pellegrino et al. [5], which enables the maintenance of the patient in a supine position throughout, avoiding repositioning and re-docking. This allowed rapid, precise Access Port placement. Transitioning from the renal quadrant to the bladder cuff was streamlined and efficient, utilising the advanced functionality of the da Vinci SP system's ‘Relocate Mode’, with bed-side assistance optimising instrument settings during this phase.

To our knowledge, this represents the first reported European case of RANU using a retroperitoneal approach with the da Vinci SP robotic platform. In our experience, the SP platform overcomes limitations in confined surgical spaces such as the retroperitoneum. Postoperative pain was minimal, with no need for narcotics. The lower reported pain scores in retroperitoneal surgery, compared to transperitoneal, are likely due to avoiding peritoneal membrane irritation, which is highly innervated and sensitive to distension caused by pneumoperitoneum, and surgical incisions. Additional benefits include faster recovery and decrease surgical trauma. From a surgical perspective, the retroperitoneal approach utilising the SP platform presents notable benefits, including enhanced control of hilar structures, reduced blood loss, fewer surgical complications, and diminished postoperative discomfort. Evaluating the potential cost reduction associated with shorter hospital stays warrant further investigation.

In our opinion, LND appears feasible with this approach, offering easy access to locoregional lymph nodes, including the iliac, para-aortic, para-caval, and hilar nodes. It may be advisable to avoid this technique in patients with extensive lymph node involvement due to the limited operative field and potential difficulties in managing the aspiration system.

This technique has not shown significant limitations. However, in obese patients, the procedure becomes more challenging due to the excess fat, which further reduces the already limited operative field. Retroperitoneal adhesions caused by inflammation, such as in patients with a history of UTIs or pyelonephritis related to stones, could present the greatest limitation due to the difficulties in creating the retro-pneumoperitoneum.

Here, we detailed the surgical steps and showed the safety and feasibility of SP RANU procedure via a supine anterior retroperitoneal access. This procedure offers key advantages for both the surgeon (allowing a completely retroperitoneal multi-quadrant surgery) and, above all, the patient (more natural position during the surgery, minimising skin incision and postoperative pain, shortening the hospitalisation time).

As the SP system is increasingly adopted worldwide, SP RANU has to potential to become a competitive player in the surgical armamentarium for the treatment of UTUC. A comparative analysis with multiport Xi RANU should be the focus of future clinical research.

The authors declare that they have no disclosure of interest.

https://zenodo.org/records/13767816.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过仰卧前路进行的单孔机器人辅助肾切除术:循序渐进的技术。
根治性肾输尿管切除术(NU)仍然是治疗非转移性高危上尿路癌(UTUC)[1]的标准治疗方法。机器人辅助NU (RANU)在过去几年中获得了更广泛的采用,特别是在引入达芬奇®(Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) Xi机器人平台之后,该平台促进了多象限外科手术b[2]。然而,Xi RANU主要通过经腹膜入路进行。达芬奇单端口系统(达芬奇SP®;Intuitive Surgical Inc.)于2018年被引入美国市场,最近获得了欧洲的批准。这种新颖的机器人平台重新引起了人们对肾手术后腹膜入路的兴趣,包括RANU[5]。与多孔系统相比,优点包括切口更小,美容效果更好,手术创伤更少,疼痛更少,恢复更快。迄今为止,只有很少的SP RANU病例被报道[6,7]。在这里,我们详细描述了SP RANU的手术技术,展示了其可行性和易于在大容量机器人中心实施。我们编辑的视频(视频S1)显示了2024年5月在我们机构使用达芬奇SP进行的RANU病例。选择男性,70岁,骨盆肿瘤2.8 cm, Charlson合并症指数6,体重指数29.32 kg/m2。记录的手术结果包括:停靠和控制时间、估计失血量(EBL)、并发症、血红蛋白、肌酐、出院时疼痛评分(采用数值评定量表)和住院时间。切口与对接时间为14 min,控制台时间为105 min,总手术时间为119 min。术中EBL 100ml。无术中及术后并发症报告。患者于术后第一天出院。出院时血红蛋白水平为121 g/L,术前为124 g/L。放电时肌酐为135.25 μmol/L (1.53 mg/dL),术前肌酐为83.98 μmol/L (0.95 mg/dL)。出院时疼痛评分为1.2分(满分10分)。术后护理中未使用麻醉品。病理显示高级别尿路上皮癌伴阴性切缘。迄今为止,在我们的研究所,我们已经使用新的达芬奇SP平台进行了8例RANU手术。在我们的8例患者中,术后结果明显良好。手术期间平均EBL为130 mL,无患者需要输血。平均缓解时间为108分钟,所有病例均行膀胱袖切除术。此外,3例患者进行了局部淋巴结清扫(LND),没有一例发生淋巴囊肿。所有患者均于术后第一天出院,留置Foley导尿管,膀胱造影后7天拔除。所有患者均未进行腹腔引流。病理报告证实没有患者手术切缘阳性。SP RANU是一种安全且可重复的多象限手术,可通过下前腹膜后入路进行。Xi RANU是一种成熟的微创治疗UTUC的方法。虽然探讨了腹膜后入路治疗多腔RANU,但由于技术上的限制,主要是经腹膜。Xi手术仍然面临着从肾脏到膀胱的内部冲突和不理想的工作角度。SP平台专为腹膜后和骨盆等狭窄空间设计,允许多象限手术,可以优化RANU。我们使用了Pellegrino等人的新型仰卧位腹膜后前通路技术,该技术可使患者始终保持仰卧位,避免重新定位和再对接。这允许快速,精确的访问端口放置。利用达芬奇SP系统的“重新定位模式”的先进功能,从肾脏象限到膀胱袖的过渡是流线型和高效的,在这一阶段,床边辅助优化了仪器设置。据我们所知,这是欧洲首例使用达芬奇SP机器人平台腹膜后入路治疗RANU的病例。根据我们的经验,SP平台克服了腹膜后等狭窄手术空间的局限性。术后疼痛极轻,无需麻醉。与经腹膜手术相比,腹膜后手术的疼痛评分较低,可能是由于避免了腹膜刺激,腹膜对气腹引起的膨胀高度神经兴奋和敏感,以及手术切口。额外的好处包括更快的恢复和减少手术创伤。 从外科角度来看,利用SP平台的腹膜后入路具有显著的优势,包括加强对肺门结构的控制,减少失血,减少手术并发症,减少术后不适。评估与缩短住院时间相关的潜在成本降低值得进一步调查。我们认为,采用这种入路,LND似乎是可行的,可以方便地到达局部区域淋巴结,包括髂、主动脉旁淋巴结、腔旁淋巴结和肝门淋巴结。由于手术范围有限和管理抽吸系统的潜在困难,可能建议避免广泛淋巴结受累者使用该技术。这项技术没有显示出明显的局限性。然而,对于肥胖患者,由于多余的脂肪,手术变得更具挑战性,这进一步缩小了本已有限的手术范围。由炎症引起的腹膜后粘连,如有尿路感染或肾盂肾炎病史的患者,由于难以形成腹膜后气腹,可能是最大的限制。在这里,我们详细介绍了手术步骤,并展示了通过仰卧位前腹膜后通路SP RANU手术的安全性和可行性。该手术对外科医生(允许完全腹膜后多象限手术)和患者(手术过程中更自然的位置,最大限度地减少皮肤切口和术后疼痛,缩短住院时间)都具有关键优势。随着SP系统在世界范围内越来越多地采用,SP RANU有潜力成为治疗UTUC的外科设备中具有竞争力的参与者。将其与多口西药进行比较分析应成为今后临床研究的重点。作者声明他们没有任何利益披露。https://zenodo.org/records/13767816。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
期刊最新文献
Response to comment by Semwal et al. Comment on 'Prostate zonal impact of 5α-reductase inhibitors on multiparametric MRI characteristics and detection of prostate cancer'. Area deprivation and cancer-specific mortality in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a statewide analysis. Beyond pass or fail: Enhancing the rigour in urological artificial intelligence examination assessment. Defining standards for retroperitoneal single-port (SP) robotic surgery: the Advancing Retroperitoneal International SP Excellence (ARISE) international Delphi consensus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1