A novel low shrinkage dimethacrylate monomer as an alternative to BisGMA for adhesive and resin-based composite applications.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0097
Fernanda Sandes de Lucena, Matthew Logan, Steven Lewis, Neil Deatherage, Adilson Yoshio Furuse, Carmem Silvia Pfeifer
{"title":"A novel low shrinkage dimethacrylate monomer as an alternative to BisGMA for adhesive and resin-based composite applications.","authors":"Fernanda Sandes de Lucena, Matthew Logan, Steven Lewis, Neil Deatherage, Adilson Yoshio Furuse, Carmem Silvia Pfeifer","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to develop a mixture of dimethacrylate isomers (PG6EMA) as a potential monomer for dental adhesives and composites. PG6EMA was synthesized de novo and characterized in the presence of ethanol (3%, 6% or 9%). BisGMA/TEGDMA (BTEG, 50/50 wt.%) was used as the resin control. Composites were formulated with 60 wt.% of either PG6EMA or BisGMA (40 wt.% TEGDMA and 70 wt.% filler). DMPA (0.2 wt.%) and DPI-PF6 (0.4 wt.%) were added as photoinitiators, irradiated with a mercury arc lamp (320-500 nm, 500 mW/cm2; Acticure). All materials were tested for polymerization kinetics (near-infrared), viscosity (η) and storage modulus (G', oscillatory rheometry). The composites were further characterized for water sorption/solubility, wet/dry flexural strength/modulus and polymerization stress. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA/Tukey's test (α = 0.05). The PG6EMA resins showed lower rates of polymerization compared with BTEG (p = 0.001) but high degrees of conversion (p = 0.002). Solvent concentration did not affect RPMAX but the 6% and 9% mixtures showed higher final DC, likely due to reduced viscosity. PG6EMA had much higher viscosity than BTEG (p <0.001) and lower G' (p = 0.003). Composites modified with PG6EMA have slower polymerization rates (p = 0.001) but higher final DC (p = 0.04) than the control. PG6EMA/TEGDMA showed lower dry/wet flexural strength and comparable dry modulus. The PG6EMA/TEGDMA composite showed a 18.4% polymerization stress reduction compared to the BTEG composite. Both base monomers had similar WS/SL and G'. Within its limitations, this study demonstrated that the newly synthesized PG6EMA was a viable alternative to BisGMA in dental composites.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a mixture of dimethacrylate isomers (PG6EMA) as a potential monomer for dental adhesives and composites. PG6EMA was synthesized de novo and characterized in the presence of ethanol (3%, 6% or 9%). BisGMA/TEGDMA (BTEG, 50/50 wt.%) was used as the resin control. Composites were formulated with 60 wt.% of either PG6EMA or BisGMA (40 wt.% TEGDMA and 70 wt.% filler). DMPA (0.2 wt.%) and DPI-PF6 (0.4 wt.%) were added as photoinitiators, irradiated with a mercury arc lamp (320-500 nm, 500 mW/cm2; Acticure). All materials were tested for polymerization kinetics (near-infrared), viscosity (η) and storage modulus (G', oscillatory rheometry). The composites were further characterized for water sorption/solubility, wet/dry flexural strength/modulus and polymerization stress. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA/Tukey's test (α = 0.05). The PG6EMA resins showed lower rates of polymerization compared with BTEG (p = 0.001) but high degrees of conversion (p = 0.002). Solvent concentration did not affect RPMAX but the 6% and 9% mixtures showed higher final DC, likely due to reduced viscosity. PG6EMA had much higher viscosity than BTEG (p <0.001) and lower G' (p = 0.003). Composites modified with PG6EMA have slower polymerization rates (p = 0.001) but higher final DC (p = 0.04) than the control. PG6EMA/TEGDMA showed lower dry/wet flexural strength and comparable dry modulus. The PG6EMA/TEGDMA composite showed a 18.4% polymerization stress reduction compared to the BTEG composite. Both base monomers had similar WS/SL and G'. Within its limitations, this study demonstrated that the newly synthesized PG6EMA was a viable alternative to BisGMA in dental composites.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新型低收缩二甲基丙烯酸酯单体,可替代 BisGMA 用于粘合剂和树脂基复合材料应用。
本研究旨在开发一种二甲基丙烯酸酯异构体混合物(PG6EMA),作为牙科粘合剂和复合材料的潜在单体。PG6EMA 是在乙醇(3%、6% 或 9%)存在下从头合成的,并对其进行了表征。双GMA/TEGDMA(BTEG,50/50 wt.%)用作树脂对照。复合材料由 60 wt.% 的 PG6EMA 或 BisGMA(40 wt.% 的 TEGDMA 和 70 wt.% 的填料)配制而成。添加 DMPA(0.2 wt.%)和 DPI-PF6(0.4 wt.%)作为光引发剂,用汞弧灯(320-500 纳米,500 mW/cm2;Acticure)照射。对所有材料进行了聚合动力学(近红外)、粘度(η)和储存模量(G',振荡流变仪)测试。对复合材料的吸水性/溶解性、干/湿挠曲强度/模量和聚合应力进行了进一步表征。数据采用单因素方差分析/Tukey 检验(α = 0.05)进行分析。与 BTEG 相比,PG6EMA 树脂的聚合速率较低(p = 0.001),但转化率较高(p = 0.002)。溶剂浓度对 RPMAX 没有影响,但 6% 和 9% 的混合物显示出更高的最终 DC,这可能是由于粘度降低所致。PG6EMA 的粘度比 BTEG 高得多(p = 0.002)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Brazilian Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine: current state of the study of rare diseases. A novel low shrinkage dimethacrylate monomer as an alternative to BisGMA for adhesive and resin-based composite applications. A YOLO-V5 approach for the evaluation of normal fillings and overhanging fillings: an artificial intelligence study. Cross-cultural adaptation of the eHealth Literacy Scale for Brazilian adolescents. Influence of the digital file format on radiographic diagnostic in dentistry: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1