Effects of Progesterone on Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women (PROGEST) - a Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial (RDPCT).

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2322-0967
Sissi Valentina Beinert, Frauke Kleinsorge, Julia Worm, Katharina Victoria Tropschuh, Vanadin Seifert-Klauss
{"title":"Effects of Progesterone on Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women (PROGEST) - a Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial (RDPCT).","authors":"Sissi Valentina Beinert, Frauke Kleinsorge, Julia Worm, Katharina Victoria Tropschuh, Vanadin Seifert-Klauss","doi":"10.1055/a-2322-0967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b> Monotherapy with progesterone for treatment of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) was more effective than placebo treatment of postmenopausal healthy women in a Canadian trial. The PROGEST-trial was initiated to fulfill FDA-approval criteria for the indication of treatment of postmenopausal VMS. <b>Methods</b> This prospective randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial studied three doses of oral micronized progesterone (200 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg) and placebo for 12 weeks. Postmenopausal women with moderate to severe VMS (> 50 per week) were screened for one week for VMS frequency, then randomized to 200, 300 or 400 mg progesterone daily or placebo for a double-blinded trial of 12 weeks duration. <b>Results</b> 74 women were recruited in 12 study centers. 44 terminated the study as per protocol (PP). Moderate to severe hot flushes decreased by 7.4/d in the placebo arm, 7.7 VMS/d with 200 mg/d progesterone (P4), 8.3 VMS/d on 300 mg/d and 9.0 VMS/d on 400 mg/d P4, respectively by week 12. 32 treatment emergent adverse events were documented in 18 participants, mostly minor AEs. The only SAE was a syncope requiring hospitalization on the day after treatment initiation, leading to discontinuation of the drug. <b>Discussion</b> Baseline VMS frequency was much higher in the German than in the Canadian study and the course of the placebo group had a markedly stronger decrease in VMS-frequency during the PROGEST study (-7.4/d) than in the Canadian trial (-1.4/d). Trial populations differed by age, BMI, the number of women with natural menopause, and comorbidities, mainly hypertension. <b>Conclusion</b> Premature discontinuation of the trial due to insufficient subject accrual rate led to only 55 randomized participants for analysis, therefore the study results lack statistical power. Still, a slight dose-dependent improvement in VMS was seen for all doses, while AE frequency did not increase with progesterone dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"84 10","pages":"969-978"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2322-0967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Monotherapy with progesterone for treatment of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) was more effective than placebo treatment of postmenopausal healthy women in a Canadian trial. The PROGEST-trial was initiated to fulfill FDA-approval criteria for the indication of treatment of postmenopausal VMS. Methods This prospective randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial studied three doses of oral micronized progesterone (200 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg) and placebo for 12 weeks. Postmenopausal women with moderate to severe VMS (> 50 per week) were screened for one week for VMS frequency, then randomized to 200, 300 or 400 mg progesterone daily or placebo for a double-blinded trial of 12 weeks duration. Results 74 women were recruited in 12 study centers. 44 terminated the study as per protocol (PP). Moderate to severe hot flushes decreased by 7.4/d in the placebo arm, 7.7 VMS/d with 200 mg/d progesterone (P4), 8.3 VMS/d on 300 mg/d and 9.0 VMS/d on 400 mg/d P4, respectively by week 12. 32 treatment emergent adverse events were documented in 18 participants, mostly minor AEs. The only SAE was a syncope requiring hospitalization on the day after treatment initiation, leading to discontinuation of the drug. Discussion Baseline VMS frequency was much higher in the German than in the Canadian study and the course of the placebo group had a markedly stronger decrease in VMS-frequency during the PROGEST study (-7.4/d) than in the Canadian trial (-1.4/d). Trial populations differed by age, BMI, the number of women with natural menopause, and comorbidities, mainly hypertension. Conclusion Premature discontinuation of the trial due to insufficient subject accrual rate led to only 55 randomized participants for analysis, therefore the study results lack statistical power. Still, a slight dose-dependent improvement in VMS was seen for all doses, while AE frequency did not increase with progesterone dose.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孕酮对绝经后妇女血管运动症状的影响 (PROGEST) - 一项前瞻性多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照试验 (RDPCT)。
导言:在加拿大的一项试验中,对绝经后健康妇女使用黄体酮单药治疗血管运动症状(VMS)比安慰剂治疗更有效。PROGEST试验是为了满足美国食品及药物管理局对绝经后血管运动症状治疗适应症的批准标准而启动的。方法 这项前瞻性随机、双盲安慰剂对照临床试验研究了三种剂量的口服微粒化黄体酮(200 毫克、300 毫克、400 毫克)和安慰剂,为期 12 周。对患有中度至重度 VMS(每周大于 50 次)的绝经后妇女进行为期一周的 VMS 频率筛查,然后将她们随机分为每天服用 200 毫克、300 毫克或 400 毫克黄体酮或服用安慰剂,进行为期 12 周的双盲试验。结果 12 个研究中心共招募了 74 名妇女。44人按照方案终止了研究(PP)。到第 12 周时,安慰剂组的中度至重度潮热症状每天减少 7.4 次,黄体酮(P4)200 毫克/天每天减少 7.7 次,黄体酮(P4)300 毫克/天每天减少 8.3 次,黄体酮(P4)400 毫克/天每天减少 9.0 次。在 18 名参与者中记录了 32 例治疗突发不良事件,大部分为轻微不良事件。唯一的 SAE 是在开始治疗的第二天出现晕厥,需要住院治疗,导致停药。讨论 德国研究的基线 VMS 频率远高于加拿大研究,在 PROGEST 研究期间,安慰剂组病程中 VMS 频率的下降(-7.4/d)明显强于加拿大试验(-1.4/d)。试验人群在年龄、体重指数、自然绝经妇女人数和合并症(主要是高血压)方面存在差异。结论 由于受试者加入率不足,试验提前终止,导致只有 55 名随机参与者进行了分析,因此研究结果缺乏统计学意义。尽管如此,所有剂量的黄体酮都能轻微改善VMS,而AE发生率并没有随着黄体酮剂量的增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
22.20%
发文量
828
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde (GebFra) addresses the whole field of obstetrics and gynecology and is concerned with research as much as with clinical practice. In its scientific section, it publishes original articles, reviews and case reports in all fields of the discipline, namely gynecological oncology, including oncology of the breast obstetrics and perinatal medicine, reproductive medicine, and urogynecology. GebFra invites the submission of original articles and review articles. In addition, the journal publishes guidelines, statements and recommendations in cooperation with the DGGG, SGGG, OEGGG and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF, Association of Scientific Medical Societies, www.awmf.org). Apart from the scientific section, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde has a news and views section that also includes discussions, book reviews and professional information. Letters to the editors are welcome. If a letter discusses an article that has been published in our journal, the corresponding author of the article will be informed and invited to comment on the letter. The comment will be published along with the letter.
期刊最新文献
Current Developments from Silicon Valley - How Artificial Intelligence is Changing Gynecology and Obstetrics. Effects of Systematically Guided vs. Self-Directed Laparoscopic Box Training on Learning Performances: An Observational Study. Retrospective Evaluation of C-reactive Protein for Ruling Out Infection After Cesarean Section. Effects of Progesterone on Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women (PROGEST) - a Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial (RDPCT). Endometrial Cancer - Long-Term Survival in Certified Cancer Centers and Non-Certified Hospitals: Comparative Analysis Based on a Large German Retrospective Cohort Study (WiZen).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1