Pub Date : 2025-12-03eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1055/a-2721-9742
Constantin S von Kaisenberg, Peter Kozlowski, Karl O Kagan, Markus Hoopmann, Kai-Sven Heling, Rabih Chaoui, Philipp Klaritsch, Barbara Pertl, Tilo Burkhardt, Sevgi Tercanli, Jochen Frenzel, Christine Mundlos
{"title":"Update on: Firsttrimester Diagnosis and Therapy @ 11 - 13 <sup>+6</sup> weeks' gestation : Amendment to the Guideline of DEGUM, ÖGUM, SGUMGG, DGGG, ÖGG, Gynecologie Suisse, DGPM, DGPGM, BVF, ACHSE (AWMF S2e LL085-002 1.1.2024) (https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/085-002).","authors":"Constantin S von Kaisenberg, Peter Kozlowski, Karl O Kagan, Markus Hoopmann, Kai-Sven Heling, Rabih Chaoui, Philipp Klaritsch, Barbara Pertl, Tilo Burkhardt, Sevgi Tercanli, Jochen Frenzel, Christine Mundlos","doi":"10.1055/a-2721-9742","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2721-9742","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"85 12","pages":"1291-1303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12674899/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145677114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-03eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1055/a-2721-9792
Constantin von Kaisenberg
{"title":"GDM screening & intervention @ 11 - 13 <sup>+6</sup> instead of 24 - 28 weeks' gestation: time for a change in paradigm?","authors":"Constantin von Kaisenberg","doi":"10.1055/a-2721-9792","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2721-9792","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"85 12","pages":"1288-1290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12674897/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145677018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Families with pathogenic germline variants (pv) in BRCA1/2 may have besides breast and ovarian cancer an elevated lifetime risk for other cancer types.
Material and methods: Data and pedigree information from 1852 family members of 286 BRCA1/2 positive families were analyzed. Genetic testing was conducted between 2015 and 2017 at the HBOC center at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Relative cancer risk (RR) was calculated by comparing observed cancer incidence with the expected incidence in the German population.
Results: BRCA1/2 positive families showed an elevated cancer risk for gastric and cervical cancer regardless of BRCA status. The relative risk of gastric cancer was higher in BRCA2 carriers compared to BRCA1 carriers (gBRCA1 RR 1.42; 95% CI: 0.65-2.69 vs. gBRCA2 RR 1.88; 95% CI: 0.75-3.87). Similarly, the relative risk for cervical cancer was also greater in BRCA2 carriers than in BRCA1 carriers (gBRCA1 RR 1.88; 95% CI: 0.69-4.09 vs. gBRCA2 RR 2.09; 95% CI: 0.56-5.35). Additionally, BRCA2 families showed an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (RR 1.56; 95% CI, 0.50 to 3.63). No significant associations were found for other cancer entities.
Conclusion: In the present study, an increased risk of gastrointestinal cancer was observed in German families with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants, consistent with findings from previous research. Potential new associations with cervical cancer were also identified, warranting confirmation through large prospective studies. These findings highlight the importance of developing additional screening programs or preventive strategies for BRCA carriers, especially with regard to upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies.
{"title":"Associations between Pathogenic Germline Variants in BRCA and Non-Breast/Non-Ovarian Cancer Types in the German Population.","authors":"Nicole Zilski, Robert Roehle, Stephanie Stegen, Jens Uwe Blohmer, Jenny Katharina Wagner, Dorothee Speiser","doi":"10.1055/a-2737-2046","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2737-2046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Families with pathogenic germline variants (pv) in BRCA1/2 may have besides breast and ovarian cancer an elevated lifetime risk for other cancer types.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data and pedigree information from 1852 family members of 286 BRCA1/2 positive families were analyzed. Genetic testing was conducted between 2015 and 2017 at the HBOC center at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Relative cancer risk (RR) was calculated by comparing observed cancer incidence with the expected incidence in the German population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BRCA1/2 positive families showed an elevated cancer risk for gastric and cervical cancer regardless of BRCA status. The relative risk of gastric cancer was higher in BRCA2 carriers compared to BRCA1 carriers (gBRCA1 RR 1.42; 95% CI: 0.65-2.69 vs. gBRCA2 RR 1.88; 95% CI: 0.75-3.87). Similarly, the relative risk for cervical cancer was also greater in BRCA2 carriers than in BRCA1 carriers (gBRCA1 RR 1.88; 95% CI: 0.69-4.09 vs. gBRCA2 RR 2.09; 95% CI: 0.56-5.35). Additionally, BRCA2 families showed an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (RR 1.56; 95% CI, 0.50 to 3.63). No significant associations were found for other cancer entities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the present study, an increased risk of gastrointestinal cancer was observed in German families with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants, consistent with findings from previous research. Potential new associations with cervical cancer were also identified, warranting confirmation through large prospective studies. These findings highlight the importance of developing additional screening programs or preventive strategies for BRCA carriers, especially with regard to upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"86 1","pages":"56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803763/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-20eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1055/a-2717-7656
Katharina Seitz, Anna-Katharin Theuser, Carolin C Hack, Peter A Fasching, Julius Emons, Lena Brückner, Katharina Au, Matthias W Beckmann, Milena Beierlein
<p><strong>Background: </strong>For the first time, an S3 guideline on complementary medicine in oncology was published in 2021, 2024 in May version 2.0 was published. The broad spectrum of complementary and integrative medicine was presented at the highest level of evidence, the respective established interventions were comprehensively addressed, and recommendations were made in the case of sufficient data availability. The guideline also contains a questionnaire for a risk-adapted evaluation of utilized CIM (complementary and integrative medicine) interventions. In this article, the clinical validation of this questionnaire from the guideline is carried out, as well as a descriptive analysis of utilization of CIM interventions in a cohort with gynecologial cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is a cross-sectional study conducted at the Women's Hospital of the University Hospital Erlangen. In a first stage, rolled out from January to February 2022, fifty patients completed the questionnaire for the structured assessment of the use of complementary medicine from the S3 guideline "Complementary Medicine in Oncology", as well as a validation questionnaire. The latter included the comprehensibility of the questions, the time taken to complete them, as well as any problems encountered and suggestions for improvement. After successful validation of the questionnaire, in the second phase, patients with gynecologic cancer were invited to participate in the survey.The patient population was characterized by descriptive analyses of age, educational level, lifestyle factors such as dietary habits and physical activity, as well as tumor characteristics and treatment. In addition, the frequency of complaints and the utilization of complementary interventions and procedures, classified according to their risk of interactions, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Validation showed that forty-five out of fifty (90%) patients felt that the questionnaire was clear to understand. Forty-seven (94%) of respondents indicated that the time taken to answer the questions was reasonable. In figures, 42% needed less than five minutes and 48% less than ten minutes.When looking at the utilization of CIM in patients with gynecological tumors, most participants were suffering from ovarian cancer (n = 61, 41.8%), followed by endometrial cancer (n = 33, 22.6%), cervical cancer (n = 32, 21.9%) and vulvar cancer (n = 20, 13.7%). In total, the utilization of a CIM intervention was described 267 times. According to the traffic light classification system in the guideline questionnaire the interventions of the green category (low risk for interaction) (n = 124, 46.4%) was the most commonly used. Therapies in the yellow category were used slightly less frequently (n = 93, 34.8%). CIM interventions of the red category were mentioned 50 times (18.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and discussion: </strong>To date, there has been a lack of standardized surveys
{"title":"Validation of the Questionnaire for the Structured Assessment of the Use of Complementary Medicine Methods and Procedures in Patients from the S3 Guideline Complementary Medicine in Oncology and Practical Use of it in Patients with Gynecological Cancer.","authors":"Katharina Seitz, Anna-Katharin Theuser, Carolin C Hack, Peter A Fasching, Julius Emons, Lena Brückner, Katharina Au, Matthias W Beckmann, Milena Beierlein","doi":"10.1055/a-2717-7656","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2717-7656","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For the first time, an S3 guideline on complementary medicine in oncology was published in 2021, 2024 in May version 2.0 was published. The broad spectrum of complementary and integrative medicine was presented at the highest level of evidence, the respective established interventions were comprehensively addressed, and recommendations were made in the case of sufficient data availability. The guideline also contains a questionnaire for a risk-adapted evaluation of utilized CIM (complementary and integrative medicine) interventions. In this article, the clinical validation of this questionnaire from the guideline is carried out, as well as a descriptive analysis of utilization of CIM interventions in a cohort with gynecologial cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is a cross-sectional study conducted at the Women's Hospital of the University Hospital Erlangen. In a first stage, rolled out from January to February 2022, fifty patients completed the questionnaire for the structured assessment of the use of complementary medicine from the S3 guideline \"Complementary Medicine in Oncology\", as well as a validation questionnaire. The latter included the comprehensibility of the questions, the time taken to complete them, as well as any problems encountered and suggestions for improvement. After successful validation of the questionnaire, in the second phase, patients with gynecologic cancer were invited to participate in the survey.The patient population was characterized by descriptive analyses of age, educational level, lifestyle factors such as dietary habits and physical activity, as well as tumor characteristics and treatment. In addition, the frequency of complaints and the utilization of complementary interventions and procedures, classified according to their risk of interactions, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Validation showed that forty-five out of fifty (90%) patients felt that the questionnaire was clear to understand. Forty-seven (94%) of respondents indicated that the time taken to answer the questions was reasonable. In figures, 42% needed less than five minutes and 48% less than ten minutes.When looking at the utilization of CIM in patients with gynecological tumors, most participants were suffering from ovarian cancer (n = 61, 41.8%), followed by endometrial cancer (n = 33, 22.6%), cervical cancer (n = 32, 21.9%) and vulvar cancer (n = 20, 13.7%). In total, the utilization of a CIM intervention was described 267 times. According to the traffic light classification system in the guideline questionnaire the interventions of the green category (low risk for interaction) (n = 124, 46.4%) was the most commonly used. Therapies in the yellow category were used slightly less frequently (n = 93, 34.8%). CIM interventions of the red category were mentioned 50 times (18.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and discussion: </strong>To date, there has been a lack of standardized surveys ","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"86 1","pages":"35-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803761/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-11eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1055/a-2717-7798
Christin Porstendorfer-Almeida Froz, Bianka Vollert, Ionna Hansen, Nina Schurig, Lara Seefeld, Victoria Weise, Cahit Birdir, Pauline Wimberger, Susan Garthus-Niegel
Background: Mistreatment and discrimination during childbirth are a global public health concern. Such experiences can adversely affect the subjective birth experience and increase the likelihood of compromised postpartum mental health, including symptoms of childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder (CB-PTSD) not only in mothers/birthing parents, but also in partners. This study examines instances of mistreatment and discrimination during childbirth, their association with CB-PTSD symptoms, and the potential mediating role of the subjective birth experience in both parents.
Methods: Data were retrieved from the prospective RESPECT PARENTS cohort, a German community sample. For the current study, data from n = 1075 mothers/birthing parents and n = 454 partners, collected at two assessment points, i.e., during pregnancy and eight weeks after birth, were included. Regression and mediation models were used to analyze the associations separately for mothers/birthing parents and partners.
Results: Mistreatment during childbirth was reported by 25.8% of mothers/birthing parents and 6.8% of partners, whereas perceived discrimination was reported by 3.9% of mothers/birthing parents and 3.5% of partners. These experiences predicted more severe CB-PTSD symptoms among mothers/birthing parents. For both parents, experiencing more mistreatment and more discrimination was associated with a more negative subjective birth experience, which in turn was associated with more severe CB-PTSD symptoms, demonstrating a significant mediation effect.
Conclusion: The current study indicates that mistreatment and discrimination during childbirth exist in Germany among both mothers/birthing parents and partners, potentially contributing to a more negative subjective birth experience and more severe CB-PTSD symptoms. The findings emphasize the need to address mistreatment and discrimination during childbirth for both parents, in general and as potential risk factors for adverse outcomes.
{"title":"Mistreatment and Discrimination during Childbirth, Associations with Symptoms of Childbirth-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and the Mediating Role of the Subjective Birth Experience: A Quantitative Analysis Within the Prospective Cohort Study RESPECT <sub>PARENTS</sub>.","authors":"Christin Porstendorfer-Almeida Froz, Bianka Vollert, Ionna Hansen, Nina Schurig, Lara Seefeld, Victoria Weise, Cahit Birdir, Pauline Wimberger, Susan Garthus-Niegel","doi":"10.1055/a-2717-7798","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2717-7798","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mistreatment and discrimination during childbirth are a global public health concern. Such experiences can adversely affect the subjective birth experience and increase the likelihood of compromised postpartum mental health, including symptoms of childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder (CB-PTSD) not only in mothers/birthing parents, but also in partners. This study examines instances of mistreatment and discrimination during childbirth, their association with CB-PTSD symptoms, and the potential mediating role of the subjective birth experience in both parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrieved from the prospective RESPECT <sub>PARENTS</sub> cohort, a German community sample. For the current study, data from n = 1075 mothers/birthing parents and n = 454 partners, collected at two assessment points, i.e., during pregnancy and eight weeks after birth, were included. Regression and mediation models were used to analyze the associations separately for mothers/birthing parents and partners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mistreatment during childbirth was reported by 25.8% of mothers/birthing parents and 6.8% of partners, whereas perceived discrimination was reported by 3.9% of mothers/birthing parents and 3.5% of partners. These experiences predicted more severe CB-PTSD symptoms among mothers/birthing parents. For both parents, experiencing more mistreatment and more discrimination was associated with a more negative subjective birth experience, which in turn was associated with more severe CB-PTSD symptoms, demonstrating a significant mediation effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study indicates that mistreatment and discrimination during childbirth exist in Germany among both mothers/birthing parents and partners, potentially contributing to a more negative subjective birth experience and more severe CB-PTSD symptoms. The findings emphasize the need to address mistreatment and discrimination during childbirth for both parents, in general and as potential risk factors for adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"85 12","pages":"1304-1325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12674902/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145677134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-04eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1055/a-2713-8946
Asal Fathi Roodsari, Friederike Gebauer, Lars Brodowski, Vivien Less, Philipp Sibbertsen, Peter Hillemanns, Constantin Sylvius von Kaisenberg, Rüdiger Klapdor, Vivien Dütemeyer
Background: Before the market launch of low-dose misoprostol (LDM) in the form of 25 µg tablets, high-dose misoprostol (HDM) was used off-label for labor induction in Germany. The differences between the effectiveness and safety of both dosage forms were investigated.
Method: This retrospective cohort study included all pregnant women who were induced with misoprostol between 2019 and 2023. Until September 2021, misoprostol was available in the form of a 200 µg tablet which was divided manually and administered orally at an initial dose of 50 µg, followed by 100 µg every four hours. This was compared with the current administration regimen of an initial dose of 25 µg followed by 50 µg in terms of vaginal birth rate, duration of induction, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Results: A total of 1941 patients were analyzed; 1397 received HDM and 544 received LDM. Vaginal delivery was achieved with equal frequency (87% HDM vs. 88% LDM, p = 0.95). The duration of induction was shorter in the HDM group (20.7 hours vs. LDM 22.7 hours, p = 0.028), and opioid requirements were higher (HDM 74% vs. LDM 69%, p = 0.036). Maternal complications and neonatal outcomes did not differ. Regression analysis found that high BMI was an independent factor for a failed first induction attempt (B 0.002, SEM 0.0004, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Both dosing regimens achieved high vaginal birth rates with comparable safety. Inductions with HDM were two hours shorter but were associated with higher opioid use.
背景:在25µg片剂低剂量米索前列醇(LDM)上市之前,高剂量米索前列醇(HDM)在德国被标签外用于引产。研究了两种剂型的有效性和安全性的差异。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入2019年至2023年间使用米索前列醇诱导的所有孕妇。直到2021年9月,米索前列醇以200µg片剂的形式提供,该片剂由人工分开,以50µg的初始剂量口服,随后每4小时服用100µg。在阴道出生率、诱导持续时间、产妇和新生儿结局方面,与目前初始剂量为25 μ g,随后剂量为50 μ g的给药方案进行了比较。结果:共分析了1941例患者;1397接收HDM, 544接收LDM。阴道分娩的频率相同(87% HDM vs 88% LDM, p = 0.95)。HDM组诱导时间较短(20.7小时vs. LDM 22.7小时,p = 0.028),阿片类药物需要量较高(HDM 74% vs. LDM 69%, p = 0.036)。产妇并发症和新生儿结局没有差异。回归分析发现,高BMI是首次引产失败的独立因素(B值0.002,SEM值0.0004,p)。结论:两种给药方案均获得较高的阴道分娩率,且安全性相当。HDM诱导时间缩短2小时,但与阿片类药物使用增加有关。
{"title":"Induction of Labor with Oral Misoprostol - Effectiveness and Safety of Low-dose vs. High-dose Regimens.","authors":"Asal Fathi Roodsari, Friederike Gebauer, Lars Brodowski, Vivien Less, Philipp Sibbertsen, Peter Hillemanns, Constantin Sylvius von Kaisenberg, Rüdiger Klapdor, Vivien Dütemeyer","doi":"10.1055/a-2713-8946","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2713-8946","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Before the market launch of low-dose misoprostol (LDM) in the form of 25 µg tablets, high-dose misoprostol (HDM) was used off-label for labor induction in Germany. The differences between the effectiveness and safety of both dosage forms were investigated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included all pregnant women who were induced with misoprostol between 2019 and 2023. Until September 2021, misoprostol was available in the form of a 200 µg tablet which was divided manually and administered orally at an initial dose of 50 µg, followed by 100 µg every four hours. This was compared with the current administration regimen of an initial dose of 25 µg followed by 50 µg in terms of vaginal birth rate, duration of induction, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1941 patients were analyzed; 1397 received HDM and 544 received LDM. Vaginal delivery was achieved with equal frequency (87% HDM vs. 88% LDM, p = 0.95). The duration of induction was shorter in the HDM group (20.7 hours vs. LDM 22.7 hours, p = 0.028), and opioid requirements were higher (HDM 74% vs. LDM 69%, p = 0.036). Maternal complications and neonatal outcomes did not differ. Regression analysis found that high BMI was an independent factor for a failed first induction attempt (B 0.002, SEM 0.0004, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both dosing regimens achieved high vaginal birth rates with comparable safety. Inductions with HDM were two hours shorter but were associated with higher opioid use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"85 12","pages":"1326-1333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12674901/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145677128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-03eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1055/a-2717-7930
Henning Schäffler, Sabine Heublein, Julia Lichtblau, Lisa Wisniewski, Brigitte Rack, Wolfgang Janni, Alexander Englisch, Johannes Englisch, Tobias Engler, Andreas Hartkopf, Sara Brucker, Lisbeth Hilmer, Franziska Fick, Fabian Kohls, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Achim Rody, Dominik Dannehl, Nikolas Tauber
Adjuvant endocrine therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors necessitates regular visits, lab assessments and side effect management, currently conducted primarily at breast cancer centers in Germany. This retrospective analysis estimates the potential travel distances, times and CO 2 emissions associated with centralized therapy management of adjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitor application. Eligible patients for ribociclib or abemaciclib therapy were retrospectively identified from 5053 early breast cancer cases at the university hospitals of Ulm, Lübeck and Tübingen, using the monarchE and NATALEE criteria. Travel times were calculated assuming 24 visits over three years for ribociclib and 18 visits over two years for abemaciclib. Of the HR+/HER2- cohort, 1432 (38%) were potentially eligible for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors, with 1080 patients included, based on available postal codes. Median travel distances and times for Ribociclib (3 years) were 1200 km (24.0 hours driving; 176.0 kg CO 2 emissions; 50.4 hours by public transport; 72.0 kg CO 2 emissions) and 900 km (18.0 hours driving; 132.3 kg CO 2 emissions; 37.8 hours by public transport; 54.0 kg CO 2 emissions) for abemaciclib (2 years). Despite its retrospective limitations, this analysis provides valuable insight into the impact of centralized care on travel time and CO 2 emissions for oral cancer therapies in Germany. As the use of oral therapies increases, clinicians, patients, policymakers and the pharmaceutical industry should jointly develop strategies to optimize the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of oral therapies.
CDK4/6抑制剂辅助内分泌治疗需要定期就诊、实验室评估和副作用管理,目前主要在德国的乳腺癌中心进行。这项回顾性分析估计了与辅助cdk4 /6抑制剂应用的集中治疗管理相关的潜在旅行距离、时间和二氧化碳排放。采用monarchE和NATALEE标准,从乌尔姆、莱贝克和宾根大学医院的5053例早期乳腺癌患者中回顾性地确定了适合接受ribociclib或abemaciclib治疗的患者。旅行时间的计算假设ribociclib在三年内访问24次,abemaciclib在两年内访问18次。在HR+/HER2-队列中,1432例(38%)患者可能符合CDK4/6辅助抑制剂的治疗条件,其中1080例患者包括在内,基于可用的邮政编码。Ribociclib(3年)的中位出行距离和时间为1200公里(24.0小时驾驶,176.0 kg co2排放;乘坐公共交通工具50.4小时,72.0 kg co2排放),而abemaciclib(2年)的中位出行距离和时间为900公里(18.0小时驾驶,132.3 kg co2排放;乘坐公共交通工具37.8小时,54.0 kg co2排放)。尽管具有回顾性局限性,但该分析为集中护理对德国口腔癌治疗的旅行时间和二氧化碳排放的影响提供了有价值的见解。随着口服疗法使用的增加,临床医生、患者、政策制定者和制药行业应共同制定策略,以优化口服疗法的安全性、可行性和有效性。
{"title":"Time Toxicity of Endocrine-based Oral CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapies.","authors":"Henning Schäffler, Sabine Heublein, Julia Lichtblau, Lisa Wisniewski, Brigitte Rack, Wolfgang Janni, Alexander Englisch, Johannes Englisch, Tobias Engler, Andreas Hartkopf, Sara Brucker, Lisbeth Hilmer, Franziska Fick, Fabian Kohls, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Achim Rody, Dominik Dannehl, Nikolas Tauber","doi":"10.1055/a-2717-7930","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2717-7930","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adjuvant endocrine therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors necessitates regular visits, lab assessments and side effect management, currently conducted primarily at breast cancer centers in Germany. This retrospective analysis estimates the potential travel distances, times and CO <sub>2</sub> emissions associated with centralized therapy management of adjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitor application. Eligible patients for ribociclib or abemaciclib therapy were retrospectively identified from 5053 early breast cancer cases at the university hospitals of Ulm, Lübeck and Tübingen, using the monarchE and NATALEE criteria. Travel times were calculated assuming 24 visits over three years for ribociclib and 18 visits over two years for abemaciclib. Of the HR+/HER2- cohort, 1432 (38%) were potentially eligible for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors, with 1080 patients included, based on available postal codes. Median travel distances and times for Ribociclib (3 years) were 1200 km (24.0 hours driving; 176.0 kg CO <sub>2</sub> emissions; 50.4 hours by public transport; 72.0 kg CO <sub>2</sub> emissions) and 900 km (18.0 hours driving; 132.3 kg CO <sub>2</sub> emissions; 37.8 hours by public transport; 54.0 kg CO <sub>2</sub> emissions) for abemaciclib (2 years). Despite its retrospective limitations, this analysis provides valuable insight into the impact of centralized care on travel time and CO <sub>2</sub> emissions for oral cancer therapies in Germany. As the use of oral therapies increases, clinicians, patients, policymakers and the pharmaceutical industry should jointly develop strategies to optimize the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of oral therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"86 1","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803762/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-16eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1055/a-2708-5818
Georg Schmidt, Theresa Mayo, Angela von Falkenhausen, Marion Kiechle, Daniel Müller
Introduction: Local perforator flaps have become an increasingly important option in oncoplastic breast surgery. Despite their long-standing use, their application in clinical practice remains limited. This study evaluates the use of thoracic wall perforator flaps, specifically the intercostal artery perforator (ICAP) and thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flaps, for volume and skin replacement after breast-conserving therapy and in the management of complications following reconstructive procedures.
Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 50 patients treated with local perforator flaps between March 2022 and March 2025 at the Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar. Follow-up examinations were conducted in a standardized manner by the primary surgeon and included clinical and ultrasound assessments of the flap, as well as documentation of complications, perfusion, and patient-reported outcomes.
Results: ICAP flaps were used in 39 cases and TDAP flaps in 11 cases. The majority of reconstructions (72%) were immediate. ICAP flaps were mainly used for lower and central defects, whereas TDAP flaps were used for upper outer quadrant and complex cases. The mean operative time was 109 minutes, longer for TDAP flaps (153 minutes). There was no total flap loss and complications were rare (one partial necrosis, three seromas). Radiotherapy was administered in 72% of cases without flap compromise. Flaps were also effective in the management of implant-related or autologous reconstruction complications.
Discussion: Perforator flaps offer reliable, low morbidity reconstruction options with good aesthetic outcomes and low complication rates, even after radiotherapy. They are also suitable for secondary reconstruction and management of complications.
Conclusion: Local perforator flaps, particularly ICAP and TDAP, are safe, versatile tools in oncoplastic breast surgery and should be more widely considered in clinical practice.
简介:局部穿支皮瓣在乳房肿瘤整形手术中已成为越来越重要的选择。尽管它们长期使用,但在临床实践中的应用仍然有限。本研究评估了胸壁穿支皮瓣,特别是肋间动脉穿支(ICAP)和胸背动脉穿支(TDAP)皮瓣在保乳治疗后的体积和皮肤置换以及重建手术后并发症的管理中的应用。材料和方法:我们对2022年3月至2025年3月期间在Klinikum rechts der Isar跨学科乳房中心接受局部穿支皮瓣治疗的50例患者进行了回顾性分析。主要外科医生以标准化的方式进行随访检查,包括对皮瓣的临床和超声评估,以及并发症、灌注和患者报告的结果的记录。结果:ICAP皮瓣39例,TDAP皮瓣11例。大多数(72%)即刻重建。ICAP皮瓣主要用于下、中心缺陷,TDAP皮瓣用于上外象限及复杂病例。平均手术时间为109分钟,TDAP皮瓣更长(153分钟)。无皮瓣全损,并发症罕见(1例部分坏死,3例血清肿)。在没有皮瓣受损的病例中,有72%的患者接受放疗。皮瓣在处理种植体相关或自体重建并发症方面也很有效。讨论:穿支皮瓣提供了可靠、低发病率的重建选择,具有良好的美学效果和低并发症率,即使在放疗后。它们也适用于二次重建和并发症的处理。结论:局部穿支皮瓣,特别是ICAP和TDAP,在乳腺肿瘤整形手术中是安全、通用的工具,在临床实践中应得到更广泛的考虑。
{"title":"Local Perforator Flaps in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: Clinical Applications of ICAP and TDAP Flaps in Reconstruction and Complication Management.","authors":"Georg Schmidt, Theresa Mayo, Angela von Falkenhausen, Marion Kiechle, Daniel Müller","doi":"10.1055/a-2708-5818","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2708-5818","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Local perforator flaps have become an increasingly important option in oncoplastic breast surgery. Despite their long-standing use, their application in clinical practice remains limited. This study evaluates the use of thoracic wall perforator flaps, specifically the intercostal artery perforator (ICAP) and thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flaps, for volume and skin replacement after breast-conserving therapy and in the management of complications following reconstructive procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of 50 patients treated with local perforator flaps between March 2022 and March 2025 at the Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar. Follow-up examinations were conducted in a standardized manner by the primary surgeon and included clinical and ultrasound assessments of the flap, as well as documentation of complications, perfusion, and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICAP flaps were used in 39 cases and TDAP flaps in 11 cases. The majority of reconstructions (72%) were immediate. ICAP flaps were mainly used for lower and central defects, whereas TDAP flaps were used for upper outer quadrant and complex cases. The mean operative time was 109 minutes, longer for TDAP flaps (153 minutes). There was no total flap loss and complications were rare (one partial necrosis, three seromas). Radiotherapy was administered in 72% of cases without flap compromise. Flaps were also effective in the management of implant-related or autologous reconstruction complications.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Perforator flaps offer reliable, low morbidity reconstruction options with good aesthetic outcomes and low complication rates, even after radiotherapy. They are also suitable for secondary reconstruction and management of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Local perforator flaps, particularly ICAP and TDAP, are safe, versatile tools in oncoplastic breast surgery and should be more widely considered in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"86 1","pages":"45-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803764/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Germany is approximately 10%. One third of affected women require insulin therapy when conservative measures such as dietary changes and physical activity are insufficient to achieve target glucose levels. Timely initiation of insulin therapy is crucial for optimising obstetric outcomes. Early identification of high-risk patients at the time of diagnosis would facilitate prompt and individualised treatment adjustments.
Materials and methods: A risk calculator was developed based on clinical parameters and medical history information to estimate the individual risk for insulin therapy. The models were derived from real-world data of the GestDiab registry, comprising 14157 pregnancies between 2018 and 2020, of which 4319 (30.5%) required insulin therapy.
Results: Various models incorporating maternal age, gestational age at diagnosis, parity, gravidity, body mass index, 75 g oral glucose tolerance test values, HbA1c levels, history of gestational diabetes mellitus, and family history of diabetes were developed. Validation using the GestDiab cohort from 2021 demonstrated that the model including all variables exhibited the highest predictive power (AUC 0.740).
Conclusions: The risk calculator is provided online to support both patients and physicians in making informed decisions. Individualised counselling based on personal risk assessments may enhance therapy adherence and potentially reduce the necessity for insulin therapy.
{"title":"Individual Prediction of Insulin Therapy in Gestational Diabetes: Development of a Risk Calculator Based on Real-World Data from the GestDiab Registry.","authors":"Friederike Weschenfelder, Barbara Dusek, Heinke Adamczewski, Dietmar Weber, Matthias Kaltheuner, Yvonne Heimann, Tanja Groten","doi":"10.1055/a-2689-4637","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2689-4637","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Germany is approximately 10%. One third of affected women require insulin therapy when conservative measures such as dietary changes and physical activity are insufficient to achieve target glucose levels. Timely initiation of insulin therapy is crucial for optimising obstetric outcomes. Early identification of high-risk patients at the time of diagnosis would facilitate prompt and individualised treatment adjustments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A risk calculator was developed based on clinical parameters and medical history information to estimate the individual risk for insulin therapy. The models were derived from real-world data of the GestDiab registry, comprising 14157 pregnancies between 2018 and 2020, of which 4319 (30.5%) required insulin therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Various models incorporating maternal age, gestational age at diagnosis, parity, gravidity, body mass index, 75 g oral glucose tolerance test values, HbA1c levels, history of gestational diabetes mellitus, and family history of diabetes were developed. Validation using the GestDiab cohort from 2021 demonstrated that the model including all variables exhibited the highest predictive power (AUC 0.740).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk calculator is provided online to support both patients and physicians in making informed decisions. Individualised counselling based on personal risk assessments may enhance therapy adherence and potentially reduce the necessity for insulin therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"85 12","pages":"1334-1341"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12674896/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145677073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-22eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1055/a-2704-9622
Jana Beyer, Yvonne Jäger, Derya Balci, Gelia Kolb, Friederike Weschenfelder, Sven Seeger, Dietmar Schlembach, Michael Abou-Dakn, Ekkehard Schleußner
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-1860-0419.].
[此更正文章DOI: 10.1055/a-1860-0419.]。
{"title":"Correction: Induction of Labor at Term with Oral Misoprostol or as a Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert - A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Jana Beyer, Yvonne Jäger, Derya Balci, Gelia Kolb, Friederike Weschenfelder, Sven Seeger, Dietmar Schlembach, Michael Abou-Dakn, Ekkehard Schleußner","doi":"10.1055/a-2704-9622","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2704-9622","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-1860-0419.].</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"85 9","pages":"e3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453902/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145129866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}