{"title":"Prediction of vaults in eyes with vertical implantable collamer lens implantation.","authors":"Ryuichi Shimada, Satoshi Katagiri, Hiroshi Horiguchi, Tadashi Nakano, Yoshihiro Kitazawa","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To design formulas for predicting postoperative vaults in vertical Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation and to achieve more precise predictions using machine learning models.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>XXXX (anonymized for review).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 720 eyes in 408 patients who underwent vertical ICL implantation. The data included age, sex, refractions, anterior segment biometric data, and surgical records. We designed three formulas (named V1-V3 formulas) using multiple linear regression analysis, and tested four machine learning models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Predicted vaults by V1-V3 formulas were 444.17 ± 93.83 μm, 444.08 ± 98.64 μm, and 444.27 ± 108.81 μm, with mean absolute error of 127.97 ± 107.92, 126.41 ± 105.86, and 122.90 ± 103.00 μm. There were no significant differences in error among the V1-V3 formulas, despite the fact that the V1 and V2 formulas referred to limited parameters (three and four, respectively), and the V3 formula referred to all 12 parameters. Two of four machine learning models, XGBoost and Random Forest Regressor, showed a better performance in predicted vaults: 444.52 ± 120.51 and 446.00 ± 102.55 μm and mean absolute error: 118.31 ± 100.55 and 118.63 ± 99.34 μm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to design V1-V3 formulas for vertical ICL implantation. The V1 and V2 formulas exhibited good performance despite the limited parameters. In addition, two of the four machine learning models predicted more precise results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To design formulas for predicting postoperative vaults in vertical Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation and to achieve more precise predictions using machine learning models.
Design: Retrospective observational study.
Setting: XXXX (anonymized for review).
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 720 eyes in 408 patients who underwent vertical ICL implantation. The data included age, sex, refractions, anterior segment biometric data, and surgical records. We designed three formulas (named V1-V3 formulas) using multiple linear regression analysis, and tested four machine learning models.
Results: Predicted vaults by V1-V3 formulas were 444.17 ± 93.83 μm, 444.08 ± 98.64 μm, and 444.27 ± 108.81 μm, with mean absolute error of 127.97 ± 107.92, 126.41 ± 105.86, and 122.90 ± 103.00 μm. There were no significant differences in error among the V1-V3 formulas, despite the fact that the V1 and V2 formulas referred to limited parameters (three and four, respectively), and the V3 formula referred to all 12 parameters. Two of four machine learning models, XGBoost and Random Forest Regressor, showed a better performance in predicted vaults: 444.52 ± 120.51 and 446.00 ± 102.55 μm and mean absolute error: 118.31 ± 100.55 and 118.63 ± 99.34 μm, respectively.
Conclusions: This is the first study to design V1-V3 formulas for vertical ICL implantation. The V1 and V2 formulas exhibited good performance despite the limited parameters. In addition, two of the four machine learning models predicted more precise results.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS).
JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.