New Keratoconus Grading System Based on OCT: Threshold Adjustment for a Swept-Source OCT.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of cataract and refractive surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001640
Nan-Ji Lu, Frederik Raiskup, Lutz E Pillunat, Qin-Mei Wang, Le-Le Cui, Robert Herber
{"title":"New Keratoconus Grading System Based on OCT: Threshold Adjustment for a Swept-Source OCT.","authors":"Nan-Ji Lu, Frederik Raiskup, Lutz E Pillunat, Qin-Mei Wang, Le-Le Cui, Robert Herber","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the performance of the STEP keratoconus (KC) grading system using swept-source (SS)-OCT, and to compare the relative performance of SS-OCT and spectral domain (SD)-OCT for thickness measurements.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospitals in Germany and China.</p><p><strong>Designs: </strong>Retrospective case-control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rotating Scheimpflug Tomography (RSC, Pentacam) and SS-OCT (ANTERION) were used to examine 152 normal and 314 KC eyes from a German cohort; The STEP system (stroma thinnest thickness [ST] and epithelium standard deviation [EP]) was generated in SS-OCT and compared with RSC ABC system. Pentacam and SD-OCT (RTVue-XR) data from a Chinese cohort of 236 normal and 331 KC eyes were utilized to indirectly assess inter-device agreement between SS-OCT and SD-OCT using Bland-Altman plots and linear regression. Optimized thresholds for STEP 'ST' were determined for SS-OCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In normal eyes, STEP 'ST' agreement with RSC 'C' was 91.45%, dropping to 28.98% in KC eyes. STEP 'EP' showed 58.55% and 60.53% agreement with RSC 'A' and 'B' in normal eyes, and 36.62% and 52.87% in KC eyes, respectively. SS-OCT's ST values were estimated to be higher than those of SD-OCT (estimated mean difference = 23.18 and 20.91 μm in the normal and KC eyes, respectively). Adjusted threshold of STEP 'ST' for SS-OCT was proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SS-OCT's STEP 'EP' aligned well with RSC ABC system, while thresholds for SS-OCT's STEP 'ST' required adjustment for more accurate clinical application. These findings highlight important considerations for thickness measurement discrepancies between SS-OCT and SD-OCT, with broader implications for future clinical practice and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the performance of the STEP keratoconus (KC) grading system using swept-source (SS)-OCT, and to compare the relative performance of SS-OCT and spectral domain (SD)-OCT for thickness measurements.

Setting: University hospitals in Germany and China.

Designs: Retrospective case-control study.

Methods: Rotating Scheimpflug Tomography (RSC, Pentacam) and SS-OCT (ANTERION) were used to examine 152 normal and 314 KC eyes from a German cohort; The STEP system (stroma thinnest thickness [ST] and epithelium standard deviation [EP]) was generated in SS-OCT and compared with RSC ABC system. Pentacam and SD-OCT (RTVue-XR) data from a Chinese cohort of 236 normal and 331 KC eyes were utilized to indirectly assess inter-device agreement between SS-OCT and SD-OCT using Bland-Altman plots and linear regression. Optimized thresholds for STEP 'ST' were determined for SS-OCT.

Results: In normal eyes, STEP 'ST' agreement with RSC 'C' was 91.45%, dropping to 28.98% in KC eyes. STEP 'EP' showed 58.55% and 60.53% agreement with RSC 'A' and 'B' in normal eyes, and 36.62% and 52.87% in KC eyes, respectively. SS-OCT's ST values were estimated to be higher than those of SD-OCT (estimated mean difference = 23.18 and 20.91 μm in the normal and KC eyes, respectively). Adjusted threshold of STEP 'ST' for SS-OCT was proposed.

Conclusions: SS-OCT's STEP 'EP' aligned well with RSC ABC system, while thresholds for SS-OCT's STEP 'ST' required adjustment for more accurate clinical application. These findings highlight important considerations for thickness measurement discrepancies between SS-OCT and SD-OCT, with broader implications for future clinical practice and research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
期刊最新文献
Interlenticular Membrane Formation After Piggyback Lens Implantation: Novel AS-OCT Imaging of a Well-Documented Complication. True Exfoliation Syndrome: A Case Study with anterior segment SS-OCT. New Keratoconus Grading System Based on OCT: Threshold Adjustment for a Swept-Source OCT. Standards for Analyzing Astigmatic Outcomes II: Recommended statistical methods. Standards for analyzing astigmatic outcomes Part I: Astigmatism basics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1