Patient preferences for the provision of NHS medicines helpline services: a discrete choice experiment.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2404973
Ben Ashby, Matthew D Jones
{"title":"Patient preferences for the provision of NHS medicines helpline services: a discrete choice experiment.","authors":"Ben Ashby, Matthew D Jones","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2404973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient medicines helpline services (PMHS) can reduce harm and improve medicines adherence and patient satisfaction after hospital discharge. There is little evidence of which PMHS attributes are most important to patients. This would enable PMHS providers to prioritise their limited resources to maximise patient benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient preferences for PMHS attributes were measured using a discrete choice experiment. Seven attributes were identified from past research, documentary analysis and stakeholder consultation. These were used to produce a D-efficient design with two blocks of ten choice sets incorporated into an online survey. Adults in the UK who took more than one medicine were eligible to complete the survey and were recruited via the Research for the Future database. Preferences were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Associations between participant characteristics and preferences were investigated with latent class models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>460 participants completed the survey. The most valued attributes were weekend opening (willingness-to-pay, WTP: £11.20), evening opening (WTP: £8.89), and receiving an answer on the same day (WTP: £9.27). Alternative contact methods, immediate contact with a pharmacist and helpline location were valued less. Female gender and full-time work were associated with variation in preferences. For one latent class containing 27% of participants, PMHS location at the patient's hospital was the most valued attribute.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PMHS providers should prioritise extended opening hours and answering questions on the same day. Limitations include a non-representative sample in terms of ethnicity, education and geography, and the exclusion of people without internet access.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2404973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient medicines helpline services (PMHS) can reduce harm and improve medicines adherence and patient satisfaction after hospital discharge. There is little evidence of which PMHS attributes are most important to patients. This would enable PMHS providers to prioritise their limited resources to maximise patient benefit.

Methods: Patient preferences for PMHS attributes were measured using a discrete choice experiment. Seven attributes were identified from past research, documentary analysis and stakeholder consultation. These were used to produce a D-efficient design with two blocks of ten choice sets incorporated into an online survey. Adults in the UK who took more than one medicine were eligible to complete the survey and were recruited via the Research for the Future database. Preferences were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Associations between participant characteristics and preferences were investigated with latent class models.

Results: 460 participants completed the survey. The most valued attributes were weekend opening (willingness-to-pay, WTP: £11.20), evening opening (WTP: £8.89), and receiving an answer on the same day (WTP: £9.27). Alternative contact methods, immediate contact with a pharmacist and helpline location were valued less. Female gender and full-time work were associated with variation in preferences. For one latent class containing 27% of participants, PMHS location at the patient's hospital was the most valued attribute.

Discussion: PMHS providers should prioritise extended opening hours and answering questions on the same day. Limitations include a non-representative sample in terms of ethnicity, education and geography, and the exclusion of people without internet access.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对 NHS 药品求助热线服务的偏好:离散选择实验。
导言:患者药物帮助热线服务(PMHS)可以减少伤害,提高患者的用药依从性和出院后的满意度。目前几乎没有证据表明哪些PMHS属性对患者最为重要。这将使 PMHS 提供者能够优先考虑其有限的资源,最大限度地为患者谋福利:方法:使用离散选择实验测量患者对 PMHS 属性的偏好。从过去的研究、文献分析和利益相关者咨询中确定了七种属性。这些属性被用来制作一个D-效率设计,将两个区块的十个选择集纳入在线调查中。英国服用一种以上药物的成年人都有资格完成调查,他们是通过 "未来研究 "数据库招募的。偏好使用条件逻辑回归进行估算。利用潜类模型研究了参与者特征与偏好之间的关联:460 名参与者完成了调查。最受重视的属性是周末营业(支付意愿,WTP:11.20 英镑)、晚间营业(WTP:8.89 英镑)和当天收到答复(WTP:9.27 英镑)。其他联系方式、与药剂师的即时联系和帮助热线地点的价值较低。女性性别和全职工作与偏好的变化有关。在一个包含 27% 参与者的潜在类别中,病人所在医院的 PMHS 地点是最受重视的属性:讨论:PMHS提供者应优先考虑延长开放时间和当天回答问题。局限性包括样本在种族、教育和地域方面不具代表性,以及排除了无法上网的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
A quantitative investigation in a territory of Italy on citizens' attitudes towards medicines through the COVID-19 pandemic: the importance of possible indirect effects caused by the pandemic. Cost-effectiveness analysis of genotype-guided optimization of major depression treatment in Qatar. Exploring the influencing factors of adverse drug reaction reporting among medical personnel: a COM-B model-based study. Pharmacovigilance: the evolution of drug safety monitoring. Inhaler personalisation based on peak inspiratory flow (PIF) among dry powder inhaler users: a pilot randomised control trial (RCT) in COPD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1