Are We Enhancing Recovery After Neonatal Surgery? Assessment of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Principles for Ostomy Takedown

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.092
Shaige L. Werth BS , Nutan B. Hebballi BDS, MPH, PhD , Rachel C. Bordelon MD , Eric W. Reynolds MD , Kuojen Tsao MD , Allison L. Speer MD
{"title":"Are We Enhancing Recovery After Neonatal Surgery? Assessment of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Principles for Ostomy Takedown","authors":"Shaige L. Werth BS ,&nbsp;Nutan B. Hebballi BDS, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Rachel C. Bordelon MD ,&nbsp;Eric W. Reynolds MD ,&nbsp;Kuojen Tsao MD ,&nbsp;Allison L. Speer MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines in adults have demonstrated reduced complications, length of stay, and cost. However, neonatal ERAS studies are limited and translation of adult ERAS guidelines to neonates is challenging. Furthermore, the knowledge, perception, and practice of neonatal ERAS guidelines is largely unknown. Our aim is to address this practice gap by determining current practice of the 2020 neonatal intestinal surgery ERAS guidelines at our institution and evaluating postoperative outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted of patients &lt;1 y who underwent elective ostomy takedown at a single-center tertiary children's hospital between 2013 and 2023. A 13-point ERAS score was developed. Demographics, clinical course, pain management, nutrition, ERAS scores, and outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, logistic and negative binomial regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred eighty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. At surgery, the median age was 124 d (interquartile range [IQR] 81-220) and median weight was 4360 g (IQR 2920-7200). The median ERAS score was 6 (IQR 5-7). The highest scores were for appropriate (97.9%) and timely (91.9%) prophylactic antibiotics, and the lowest for preventing intraoperative hypothermia (14.5%), limiting opioids (9.1%), and early enteral feeding postoperatively (24.7%). Surgical site infection occurred in 14.5% and median length of stay was 28 (IQR 5-127) d.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our institution's current practice of the 2020 neonatal intestinal surgery ERAS guidelines was poor. We identified opportunities for improvement including postoperative antibiotic administration, prevention of intraoperative hypothermia, nutrition, and pain management. Future studies will focus on implementation of neonatal ERAS guidelines at our institution and evaluation of adherence and outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424004748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines in adults have demonstrated reduced complications, length of stay, and cost. However, neonatal ERAS studies are limited and translation of adult ERAS guidelines to neonates is challenging. Furthermore, the knowledge, perception, and practice of neonatal ERAS guidelines is largely unknown. Our aim is to address this practice gap by determining current practice of the 2020 neonatal intestinal surgery ERAS guidelines at our institution and evaluating postoperative outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted of patients <1 y who underwent elective ostomy takedown at a single-center tertiary children's hospital between 2013 and 2023. A 13-point ERAS score was developed. Demographics, clinical course, pain management, nutrition, ERAS scores, and outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, logistic and negative binomial regression.

Results

One hundred eighty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. At surgery, the median age was 124 d (interquartile range [IQR] 81-220) and median weight was 4360 g (IQR 2920-7200). The median ERAS score was 6 (IQR 5-7). The highest scores were for appropriate (97.9%) and timely (91.9%) prophylactic antibiotics, and the lowest for preventing intraoperative hypothermia (14.5%), limiting opioids (9.1%), and early enteral feeding postoperatively (24.7%). Surgical site infection occurred in 14.5% and median length of stay was 28 (IQR 5-127) d.

Conclusions

Our institution's current practice of the 2020 neonatal intestinal surgery ERAS guidelines was poor. We identified opportunities for improvement including postoperative antibiotic administration, prevention of intraoperative hypothermia, nutrition, and pain management. Future studies will focus on implementation of neonatal ERAS guidelines at our institution and evaluation of adherence and outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们是否加强了新生儿手术后的恢复?评估手术后促进恢复的原则:造口取下。
导言:成人术后加强恢复(ERAS)指南已证明可减少并发症、住院时间和费用。然而,新生儿ERAS研究有限,将成人ERAS指南应用于新生儿具有挑战性。此外,新生儿ERAS指南的知识、认知和实践在很大程度上还不为人所知。我们的目的是通过确定本院目前对2020年新生儿肠道手术ERAS指南的实践情况并评估术后结果来弥补这一实践空白:方法:对患者进行回顾性研究:186例患者符合纳入标准。手术时的中位年龄为124天(四分位距[IQR] 81-220),中位体重为4360克(IQR 2920-7200)。ERAS 评分中位数为 6(IQR 5-7)。得分最高的是适当(97.9%)和及时(91.9%)的预防性抗生素,得分最低的是防止术中低体温(14.5%)、限制阿片类药物(9.1%)和术后早期肠内喂养(24.7%)。手术部位感染发生率为 14.5%,中位住院时间为 28 天(IQR 5-127 天):结论:我院目前对2020年新生儿肠道手术ERAS指南的执行情况不佳。我们发现了需要改进的地方,包括术后抗生素管理、术中低体温的预防、营养和疼痛管理。未来的研究将重点关注新生儿ERAS指南在我院的实施情况,并对遵守情况和结果进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
Neurologic Complications Associated With Burn Injury and Resuscitation. A Multifactorial Analysis of Trauma Outcomes: Comorbidities, Race, and Socioeconomic Status. Rodent Model of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Demonstrates Systemic Inflammation and NeuroMarker Changes Sequential Fasciotomies for Managing Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: Porcine Experimental Study Vascular Graft Infections Treated With Bioabsorbable Antibiotic Beads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1