首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Surgical Research最新文献

英文 中文
Textbook Outcomes After Esophagectomy with Gastric Conduit for Cancer: A 2016-2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis. 食管癌胃导管切除术后的预后:2016-2021年国家手术质量改进计划分析
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.036
James J Park, Giles F Whalen, Isabel Cristina M Emmerick, Karl F Uy, Mark W Maxfield, Allison Crawford, Feiran Lou

Introduction: Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure designed to assess the overall short-term outcome of an operation. TO after esophagectomy with gastric conduit using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database has not yet been defined.

Methods: Records in the NSQIP Esophagectomy Procedure-Targeted database from 2016 to 2021 were analyzed. Patients who underwent elective esophagectomies with gastric conduit for resectable esophageal cancer were included. TO was defined as the absence of anastomotic leak, major complications, positive surgical margins, reintervention ≤30 d postsurgery, prolonged hospital stay (> 21 d), postoperative mortality ≤ 30 d after surgery, and readmission ≤ 30 d after discharge.

Results: Of the 6813 patients in the 2016-2021 NSQIP database who underwent esophagectomy, 3733 met study criteria. A total of 2520 (68%) patients achieved TO. The presence of a major complication most frequently prevented the achievement of TO (19%, 692/3733), while the presence of postoperative mortality ≤ 30 d after surgery least frequently prevented achievement of TO (2.3%). The most common complications were organ/space Surgical Site Infection (10%, 372/3733) and unplanned intubation (10%, 366/3733). Of the 493 patients who failed to achieve TO due to one parameter, positive margins (4.7%, 175/3733) and major complications (3.2%, 120/3733) most frequently prevented the achievement of TO. In a multivariable analysis, node stage of 2 or 3 in the TNM staging system, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 4, underweight body mass index, Asian race, prolonged operation time, increased preoperative white blood cell, and older age had statistically significant association with failure to achieve TO.

Conclusions: In an analysis of the NSQIP database, 68% of cases resulted in TO. Several factors were associated with failure to achieve TO. Further investigations are needed to test if modifying variables like preoperative weight can lead to improved outcomes.

简介:教科书结果(TO)是一种综合措施,旨在评估一个操作的整体短期结果。根据美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库,胃导管食管切除术后的TO尚未定义。方法:对NSQIP食管切除术手术目标数据库2016 - 2021年的记录进行分析。可切除食管癌患者接受择期食管切除术和胃导管切除术。TO定义为无吻合口漏、主要并发症、手术切缘阳性、术后再干预≤30 d、住院时间延长(> ~ 21 d)、术后死亡率≤30 d、出院后再入院≤30 d。结果:2016-2021年NSQIP数据库中6813例接受食管切除术的患者中,3733例符合研究标准。共有2520例(68%)患者达到了TO。主要并发症的存在最常阻碍TO的实现(19%,692/3733),而术后死亡率≤30 d的存在最不常阻碍TO的实现(2.3%)。最常见的并发症是器官/空间手术部位感染(10%,372/3733)和计划外插管(10%,366/3733)。在493例因一个参数未能达到to的患者中,阳性切缘(4.7%,175/3733)和主要并发症(3.2%,120/3733)最常阻碍to的实现。在一项多变量分析中,TNM分期系统中的淋巴结分期为2或3、慢性阻塞性肺病、美国麻醉学会分类为4、体重指数过轻、亚洲种族、手术时间延长、术前白细胞升高和年龄较大与未能达到to有统计学意义的关联。结论:在NSQIP数据库的分析中,68%的病例导致TO。有几个因素与未能实现to有关。需要进一步的研究来检验是否修改诸如术前体重之类的变量可以改善预后。
{"title":"Textbook Outcomes After Esophagectomy with Gastric Conduit for Cancer: A 2016-2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.","authors":"James J Park, Giles F Whalen, Isabel Cristina M Emmerick, Karl F Uy, Mark W Maxfield, Allison Crawford, Feiran Lou","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure designed to assess the overall short-term outcome of an operation. TO after esophagectomy with gastric conduit using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database has not yet been defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records in the NSQIP Esophagectomy Procedure-Targeted database from 2016 to 2021 were analyzed. Patients who underwent elective esophagectomies with gastric conduit for resectable esophageal cancer were included. TO was defined as the absence of anastomotic leak, major complications, positive surgical margins, reintervention ≤30 d postsurgery, prolonged hospital stay (> 21 d), postoperative mortality ≤ 30 d after surgery, and readmission ≤ 30 d after discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6813 patients in the 2016-2021 NSQIP database who underwent esophagectomy, 3733 met study criteria. A total of 2520 (68%) patients achieved TO. The presence of a major complication most frequently prevented the achievement of TO (19%, 692/3733), while the presence of postoperative mortality ≤ 30 d after surgery least frequently prevented achievement of TO (2.3%). The most common complications were organ/space Surgical Site Infection (10%, 372/3733) and unplanned intubation (10%, 366/3733). Of the 493 patients who failed to achieve TO due to one parameter, positive margins (4.7%, 175/3733) and major complications (3.2%, 120/3733) most frequently prevented the achievement of TO. In a multivariable analysis, node stage of 2 or 3 in the TNM staging system, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 4, underweight body mass index, Asian race, prolonged operation time, increased preoperative white blood cell, and older age had statistically significant association with failure to achieve TO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In an analysis of the NSQIP database, 68% of cases resulted in TO. Several factors were associated with failure to achieve TO. Further investigations are needed to test if modifying variables like preoperative weight can lead to improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"319 ","pages":"66-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146137384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter Regarding: Predicting Functional Outcomes in Adult Traumatic Brain Injuries Using the Base Deficit, International Normalized Ratio, and Glasgow Coma Scale Score. 关于:使用基础缺陷、国际标准化比率和格拉斯哥昏迷评分预测成人外伤性脑损伤的功能结局。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.069
Amir Masoud Karimi, Ali Hosseini
{"title":"Letter Regarding: Predicting Functional Outcomes in Adult Traumatic Brain Injuries Using the Base Deficit, International Normalized Ratio, and Glasgow Coma Scale Score.","authors":"Amir Masoud Karimi, Ali Hosseini","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.069","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidence and Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures. 血流动力学不稳定骨盆骨折中静脉血栓栓塞的发生率和危险因素。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.008
Rachel A Holstein, Courtney H Meyer, Olivia Herrmann, Alejandro De Leon Castro, James Walker, Samuel R Todd, Randi N Smith, Jonathan Nguyen, Jason D Sciarretta

Introduction: Pelvic fractures can cause severe hemorrhage and instability in trauma patients. The association between pelvic fracture morphology, venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, and clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study evaluates the incidence, risk factors, characteristics, and outcomes of VTE in hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult trauma patients with blunt pelvic ring disruptions and hemorrhagic shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) admitted to an American College of Surgeons-verified Level I adult trauma center between January 1, 2022 and May 31, 2023. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was in-hospital VTE. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality.

Results: Of 133 patients, 32 (24.1%) developed VTE (4.5% deep vein thrombosis alone, 12.8% pulmonary embolism alone, 6.8% both). VTE was diagnosed a median of 7 d after admission. Nearly all patients received early chemoprophylaxis (median initiation hospital day 1), with no differences in timing by VTE status or fracture pattern (P > 0.05). Fracture morphology was not independently associated with VTE. VTE was associated with longer intensive care unit LOS (11.5 versus 5.0 d, P < 0.001) and hospital LOS (20.5 versus 17.0 d, P = 0.028), though mortality did not differ. In multivariable regression, no independent associations were found between VTE and age, sex, body mass index, or injury severity score.

Conclusions: VTE was common despite early chemoprophylaxis. Fracture morphology did not independently predict VTE. Early VTE timing underscores the need for vigilant surveillance and uninterrupted prophylaxis. Prospective studies are needed.

骨盆骨折可导致创伤患者严重出血和不稳定。骨盆骨折形态、静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险和临床结果之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究评估血流动力学不稳定骨盆骨折中静脉血栓栓塞的发生率、危险因素、特征和结局。结果:133例患者中,32例(24.1%)发生静脉血栓栓塞(仅深静脉血栓形成4.5%,仅肺栓塞12.8%,两者均为6.8%)。静脉血栓栓塞的诊断中位时间为入院后7天。几乎所有患者都接受了早期化疗预防(中位数开始住院第1天),静脉血栓栓塞状态或骨折类型在时间上没有差异(P < 0.05)。骨折形态与静脉血栓栓塞没有独立的关系。静脉血栓栓塞与较长的重症监护病房LOS (11.5 d对5.0 d, P < 0.001)和医院LOS (20.5 d对17.0 d, P = 0.028)相关,但死亡率没有差异。在多变量回归中,没有发现静脉血栓栓塞与年龄、性别、体重指数或损伤严重程度评分之间的独立关联。结论:静脉血栓栓塞是常见的,尽管早期化疗预防。骨折形态不能独立预测静脉血栓栓塞。静脉血栓栓塞的早期时机强调了警惕监测和不间断预防的必要性。前瞻性研究是必要的。
{"title":"Incidence and Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures.","authors":"Rachel A Holstein, Courtney H Meyer, Olivia Herrmann, Alejandro De Leon Castro, James Walker, Samuel R Todd, Randi N Smith, Jonathan Nguyen, Jason D Sciarretta","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic fractures can cause severe hemorrhage and instability in trauma patients. The association between pelvic fracture morphology, venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, and clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study evaluates the incidence, risk factors, characteristics, and outcomes of VTE in hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adult trauma patients with blunt pelvic ring disruptions and hemorrhagic shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) admitted to an American College of Surgeons-verified Level I adult trauma center between January 1, 2022 and May 31, 2023. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was in-hospital VTE. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 133 patients, 32 (24.1%) developed VTE (4.5% deep vein thrombosis alone, 12.8% pulmonary embolism alone, 6.8% both). VTE was diagnosed a median of 7 d after admission. Nearly all patients received early chemoprophylaxis (median initiation hospital day 1), with no differences in timing by VTE status or fracture pattern (P > 0.05). Fracture morphology was not independently associated with VTE. VTE was associated with longer intensive care unit LOS (11.5 versus 5.0 d, P < 0.001) and hospital LOS (20.5 versus 17.0 d, P = 0.028), though mortality did not differ. In multivariable regression, no independent associations were found between VTE and age, sex, body mass index, or injury severity score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VTE was common despite early chemoprophylaxis. Fracture morphology did not independently predict VTE. Early VTE timing underscores the need for vigilant surveillance and uninterrupted prophylaxis. Prospective studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"319 ","pages":"47-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preoperative Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Therapy in Bariatric Surgery Patients with Morbid Obesity (PreMO): Rationale and Study Design for a Randomized Controlled Trial. 术前胰高血糖素样肽-1治疗减肥手术患者的病态肥胖(PreMO):一个随机对照试验的基本原理和研究设计。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.004
Varun Jain, Colleen A McMullen, Joy I Kimbrough, Anna K Rockich, Daniel L Davenport, Gregory S Hawk, Barbara S Nikolajczyk, Philip A Kern, Simon J Fisher, Joshua P Steiner, William B Inabnet, Marlene E Starr

Introduction: Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment modality for individuals with morbid obesity, providing significant and durable weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonists have shown promise as weight loss drugs, in addition to their use in the treatment of metabolic disorders. While multimodal weight management is the standard of care for individuals with morbid obesity, the benefit of antecedent GLP-1 therapy prior to bariatric surgery has not been well-studied. The objective of this study is to conduct a clinical trial testing the hypothesis that preoperative treatment with a dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist enhances preoperative weight loss and decreases tissue inflammation, resulting in improved postoperative outcomes.

Materials and methods: We designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing preoperative treatment with tirzepatide versus standard medical care prior to minimally invasive bariatric surgery with a target enrollment of 50 patients randomized 1:1. For 3 mo preoperatively, the control arm will receive standard care in the form of dietary and lifestyle modification recommendations, whereas the treatment arm will receive weekly tirzepatide, in addition to standard care. Blood will be collected at enrollment through 12-mo postoperatively and analyzed for inflammatory and metabolic markers. Tissues (adipose, stomach, and liver) will be collected intraoperatively for transcriptome profiling and histological assessment.

Results: This is an ongoing trial with no reportable results.

Conclusion: Completion of this pilot RCT will provide data to support initiation of a multicenter RCT to determine therapeutic efficacy, and mechanisms of action, by which patients could benefit from preoperative treatment with tirzepatide.

简介:减肥手术是对病态肥胖患者最有效的治疗方式,提供显著和持久的体重减轻和合并症解决。胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)和葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素多肽受体激动剂除了用于治疗代谢紊乱外,还显示出作为减肥药物的前景。虽然多模式体重管理是病态肥胖患者的标准治疗方法,但在减肥手术前进行GLP-1治疗的益处尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是通过一项临床试验来验证假设,即术前使用双GLP-1/葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素多肽受体激动剂可以促进术前体重减轻,减少组织炎症,从而改善术后预后。材料和方法:我们设计了一项随机对照试验(RCT),比较微创减肥手术前使用替西帕肽的术前治疗与标准医疗护理,目标入组50例患者,按1:1随机分组。术前3个月,对照组将接受饮食和生活方式改变建议形式的标准治疗,而治疗组除标准治疗外,每周接受替西帕肽治疗。从入组到术后12个月采集血液,分析炎症和代谢标志物。术中收集组织(脂肪、胃和肝脏)进行转录组分析和组织学评估。结果:这是一项正在进行的试验,没有报告的结果。结论:该试点RCT的完成将为开展多中心RCT提供数据支持,以确定治疗效果和作用机制,从而使患者能够从替西肽术前治疗中获益。
{"title":"Preoperative Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Therapy in Bariatric Surgery Patients with Morbid Obesity (PreMO): Rationale and Study Design for a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Varun Jain, Colleen A McMullen, Joy I Kimbrough, Anna K Rockich, Daniel L Davenport, Gregory S Hawk, Barbara S Nikolajczyk, Philip A Kern, Simon J Fisher, Joshua P Steiner, William B Inabnet, Marlene E Starr","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment modality for individuals with morbid obesity, providing significant and durable weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonists have shown promise as weight loss drugs, in addition to their use in the treatment of metabolic disorders. While multimodal weight management is the standard of care for individuals with morbid obesity, the benefit of antecedent GLP-1 therapy prior to bariatric surgery has not been well-studied. The objective of this study is to conduct a clinical trial testing the hypothesis that preoperative treatment with a dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist enhances preoperative weight loss and decreases tissue inflammation, resulting in improved postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing preoperative treatment with tirzepatide versus standard medical care prior to minimally invasive bariatric surgery with a target enrollment of 50 patients randomized 1:1. For 3 mo preoperatively, the control arm will receive standard care in the form of dietary and lifestyle modification recommendations, whereas the treatment arm will receive weekly tirzepatide, in addition to standard care. Blood will be collected at enrollment through 12-mo postoperatively and analyzed for inflammatory and metabolic markers. Tissues (adipose, stomach, and liver) will be collected intraoperatively for transcriptome profiling and histological assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This is an ongoing trial with no reportable results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Completion of this pilot RCT will provide data to support initiation of a multicenter RCT to determine therapeutic efficacy, and mechanisms of action, by which patients could benefit from preoperative treatment with tirzepatide.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"319 ","pages":"58-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gaps in the Electronic Medical Record May Contribute to Low Participation in Lung Cancer Screening. 电子病历的空白可能导致肺癌筛查参与率低。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.074
Kayla A Fay, Karen E Schifferdecker, Linda M Kinney, Ellie J Kyung, Sean R Halloran, Samuel Youkilis, Shoshana H Bardach, Amanda N Perry, Maureen B Boardman, Rian M Hasson

Introduction: Best Practice Advisories (BPAs) are electronic medical record (EMR) tools that help increase uptake of recommended health care behaviors, such as cancer screenings, by identifying eligible patients and alerting providers. However, incomplete/inaccurate documentation within the EMR can be a potential barrier to BPA utility. The purpose of this work was to investigate the effectiveness of a BPA tool to identify eligible patients for lung cancer screening (LCS) using available EMR smoking histories.

Materials and methods: Retrospective observational review was conducted of a BPA programmed to identify LCS-eligible patients at a single quaternary, LCS-accredited, academic medical center. Programming targeted patients aged 50-77 y classified as "current" or "former smokers," excluding patients with recent lung computed tomography scans and/or lung cancer diagnoses. Data analyzed included frequency of BPA activation and the associated smoking history. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze outcomes.

Results: Between January 2017 and December 2021, there were 25,172 BPA activations, of which 11,701 were removed because they occurred outside a clinical/telehealth visit. This left 14,101 BPAs linked to 3150 patients. EMR information was not sufficient to calculate pack-year history for 48.9% (1541/3150), and the LCS order rate was 2.5% (78/3150). Although pulmonary disease specialists accounted for 13.7% (236/1721) of total LCS orders, the BPA did not activate for them.

Conclusions: Incomplete EMR data entry may contribute to the complexities of identifying LCS-eligible patients. This highlights the value of improving the completeness of EMR smoking history data and conducting targeted BPA audits to understand optimal activation parameters to improve clinician orders for LCS.

简介:最佳实践咨询(bpa)是电子医疗记录(EMR)工具,通过识别符合条件的患者并提醒提供者,有助于提高推荐的医疗保健行为(如癌症筛查)的接受度。然而,EMR中不完整/不准确的文档可能是BPA应用的潜在障碍。这项工作的目的是调查BPA工具的有效性,以确定符合条件的肺癌筛查(LCS)患者使用现有的电子病历吸烟史。材料和方法:回顾性观察性评价BPA程序,以确定lcs合格的患者在一个单一的四级,lcs认可的学术医疗中心。计划的目标患者年龄在50-77岁之间,被归类为“当前”或“曾经吸烟者”,不包括最近进行肺部计算机断层扫描和/或肺癌诊断的患者。分析的数据包括BPA激活的频率和相关的吸烟史。采用描述性统计分析结果。结果:在2017年1月至2021年12月期间,有25,172例BPA激活,其中11,701例因为发生在临床/远程医疗访问之外而被删除。剩下的14101个双酚a与3150名患者有关。48.9%(1541/3150)的EMR信息不足以计算包年历史,LCS订单率为2.5%(78/3150)。虽然肺病专家占总LCS订单的13.7%(236/1721),但BPA并未为他们激活。结论:不完整的EMR数据输入可能会增加识别lcs合格患者的复杂性。这突出了提高EMR吸烟史数据的完整性和进行有针对性的BPA审计以了解最佳激活参数以改善临床医生对LCS的指示的价值。
{"title":"Gaps in the Electronic Medical Record May Contribute to Low Participation in Lung Cancer Screening.","authors":"Kayla A Fay, Karen E Schifferdecker, Linda M Kinney, Ellie J Kyung, Sean R Halloran, Samuel Youkilis, Shoshana H Bardach, Amanda N Perry, Maureen B Boardman, Rian M Hasson","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Best Practice Advisories (BPAs) are electronic medical record (EMR) tools that help increase uptake of recommended health care behaviors, such as cancer screenings, by identifying eligible patients and alerting providers. However, incomplete/inaccurate documentation within the EMR can be a potential barrier to BPA utility. The purpose of this work was to investigate the effectiveness of a BPA tool to identify eligible patients for lung cancer screening (LCS) using available EMR smoking histories.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective observational review was conducted of a BPA programmed to identify LCS-eligible patients at a single quaternary, LCS-accredited, academic medical center. Programming targeted patients aged 50-77 y classified as \"current\" or \"former smokers,\" excluding patients with recent lung computed tomography scans and/or lung cancer diagnoses. Data analyzed included frequency of BPA activation and the associated smoking history. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2017 and December 2021, there were 25,172 BPA activations, of which 11,701 were removed because they occurred outside a clinical/telehealth visit. This left 14,101 BPAs linked to 3150 patients. EMR information was not sufficient to calculate pack-year history for 48.9% (1541/3150), and the LCS order rate was 2.5% (78/3150). Although pulmonary disease specialists accounted for 13.7% (236/1721) of total LCS orders, the BPA did not activate for them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incomplete EMR data entry may contribute to the complexities of identifying LCS-eligible patients. This highlights the value of improving the completeness of EMR smoking history data and conducting targeted BPA audits to understand optimal activation parameters to improve clinician orders for LCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"319 ","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reasons for Women Surgeon Attrition From the US Workforce. 美国女性外科医生减少的原因
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.003
Elisa Bass, Richard Butterfield, Ruth Bush, Linda Harris, Palma Shaw, Kellie Brown, Ellen Julian, Sarah McLaughlin, Young Erben

Introduction: With a projected shortage of over 30,000 surgeons by 2034, understanding and reducing nonretirement attrition is critical to maintaining a sustainable surgical workforce. Prior studies show higher attrition rates among women surgeons but have limited insight into the reasons behind these decisions. This study aims to identify the factors contributing to consideration of workforce attrition among women surgeons and to highlight modifiable elements that may support retention.

Methods: An anonymous online survey was distributed to the Association of Women Surgeons email list and women surgeons' WhatsApp groups between October and December 2024. Respondents were asked whether they had considered leaving the surgical workforce for reasons unrelated to retirement and about factors contributing to both their consideration of leaving and their decision to remain. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.

Results: The response rate was 15%. Of 371 total female respondents, 242 (65%) reported having considered or currently considering leaving surgery. The top reasons cited were poor work-life balance (71%), overly demanding work (57%), and discrimination or mistreatment (50%), among whom 96% reported gender-based discrimination. Primary factors for staying included financial necessity (61%), good patient relationships (60%), and collegial support (54%). Among those who considered but decided not to leave, improved work-life balance (43%), increased compensation (26%), and improved workplace relationships (26%) were the most common influences.

Conclusions: Attrition among women surgeons stems from systemic challenges. Interventions targeting work-life balance, compensation, and workplace inclusion may meaningfully support retention and help sustain a diverse and effective surgical workforce.

到2034年,预计将有超过30,000名外科医生短缺,了解和减少非退休人员流失对于维持可持续的外科劳动力至关重要。先前的研究表明,女性外科医生的流失率更高,但对这些决定背后的原因了解有限。本研究旨在确定影响女性外科医生劳动力流失的因素,并强调可能支持保留的可修改因素。方法:于2024年10月至12月向女外科医生协会电子邮件列表和女外科医生WhatsApp群进行匿名在线调查。受访者被问及他们是否考虑过因与退休无关的原因离开外科工作队伍,以及导致他们考虑离开和决定留下的因素。采用描述性统计和卡方检验对反应进行分析。结果:有效率为15%。在371名女性受访者中,242名(65%)表示曾考虑或正在考虑放弃手术。最主要的原因是工作与生活不平衡(71%),工作要求过高(57%),以及歧视或虐待(50%),其中96%的人表示存在性别歧视。留下来的主要因素包括经济需要(61%)、良好的患者关系(60%)和大学支持(54%)。在那些考虑过但决定不离开的人中,改善工作与生活的平衡(43%)、增加薪酬(26%)和改善职场关系(26%)是最常见的影响因素。结论:女性外科医生的磨耗源于系统性挑战。针对工作与生活平衡、薪酬和工作场所包容性的干预措施可能会有意地支持保留并帮助维持多样化和有效的外科工作人员队伍。
{"title":"Reasons for Women Surgeon Attrition From the US Workforce.","authors":"Elisa Bass, Richard Butterfield, Ruth Bush, Linda Harris, Palma Shaw, Kellie Brown, Ellen Julian, Sarah McLaughlin, Young Erben","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With a projected shortage of over 30,000 surgeons by 2034, understanding and reducing nonretirement attrition is critical to maintaining a sustainable surgical workforce. Prior studies show higher attrition rates among women surgeons but have limited insight into the reasons behind these decisions. This study aims to identify the factors contributing to consideration of workforce attrition among women surgeons and to highlight modifiable elements that may support retention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey was distributed to the Association of Women Surgeons email list and women surgeons' WhatsApp groups between October and December 2024. Respondents were asked whether they had considered leaving the surgical workforce for reasons unrelated to retirement and about factors contributing to both their consideration of leaving and their decision to remain. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 15%. Of 371 total female respondents, 242 (65%) reported having considered or currently considering leaving surgery. The top reasons cited were poor work-life balance (71%), overly demanding work (57%), and discrimination or mistreatment (50%), among whom 96% reported gender-based discrimination. Primary factors for staying included financial necessity (61%), good patient relationships (60%), and collegial support (54%). Among those who considered but decided not to leave, improved work-life balance (43%), increased compensation (26%), and improved workplace relationships (26%) were the most common influences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Attrition among women surgeons stems from systemic challenges. Interventions targeting work-life balance, compensation, and workplace inclusion may meaningfully support retention and help sustain a diverse and effective surgical workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"319 ","pages":"30-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146119316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cutting Costs, Saving Lives: A Surgeon's Guide to the Foundations of Cost-effectiveness Analysis 削减成本,拯救生命:外科医生成本效益分析基础指南
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.044
Yang Zhang MScPH, Grace E. Ratcliff MPH, Jinyi Zhu PhD

Introduction

As surgical care faces increasing financial scrutiny, there is a growing need for clinicians to understand the economic value of interventions. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) provides a structured approach to comparing clinical strategies in terms of both outcomes and costs; however, these methods remain underutilized and underappreciated in many surgical disciplines.

Materials and Methods

This article introduces foundational concepts in CEA, including comparative evaluation, quality-adjusted and disability-adjusted life years, cost estimation, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and modeling techniques such as decision trees, Markov models, and microsimulation. We also explain the role of sensitivity analyses in addressing uncertainty. Concepts are illustrated with examples relevant to surgical and policy decision-making.

Results

The explainer provides a structured framework for interpreting and critiquing CEAs, highlighting how model structure, perspective, and assumptions affect conclusions about value. It provides guidance for critically appraising published CEAs and understanding their implications for clinical practice, resource allocation, and guideline development.

Conclusions

This article serves as a practical entry point for clinicians, researchers, and decision-makers seeking to understand and apply cost-effectiveness methods. It is intended to build foundational fluency in economic evaluation and support more informed engagement with value-based care, policy design, and evidence appraisal.
随着外科护理面临越来越多的财务审查,临床医生越来越需要了解干预措施的经济价值。成本效益分析(CEA)提供了一种结构化的方法来比较临床策略的结果和成本;然而,这些方法在许多外科学科中仍未得到充分利用和重视。材料和方法本文介绍了CEA的基本概念,包括比较评估、质量调整和残疾调整寿命年、成本估算、增量成本-效果比,以及决策树、马尔可夫模型和微观模拟等建模技术。我们还解释了敏感性分析在解决不确定性中的作用。概念与相关的手术和政策决策的例子说明。结果解释者提供了一个结构化的框架来解释和批评cea,强调模型结构、视角和假设如何影响关于价值的结论。它为批判性地评价已发表的cea和理解它们对临床实践、资源分配和指南制定的影响提供了指导。本文为临床医生、研究人员和决策者寻求理解和应用成本效益方法提供了一个实用的切入点。它旨在建立经济评估的基础流畅性,并支持更知情地参与基于价值的护理、政策设计和证据评估。
{"title":"Cutting Costs, Saving Lives: A Surgeon's Guide to the Foundations of Cost-effectiveness Analysis","authors":"Yang Zhang MScPH,&nbsp;Grace E. Ratcliff MPH,&nbsp;Jinyi Zhu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.044","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.044","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>As surgical care faces increasing financial scrutiny, there is a growing need for clinicians to understand the economic value of interventions. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) provides a structured approach to comparing clinical strategies in terms of both outcomes and costs; however, these methods remain underutilized and underappreciated in many surgical disciplines.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This article introduces foundational concepts in CEA, including comparative evaluation, quality-adjusted and disability-adjusted life years, cost estimation, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and modeling techniques such as decision trees, Markov models, and microsimulation. We also explain the role of sensitivity analyses in addressing uncertainty. Concepts are illustrated with examples relevant to surgical and policy decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The explainer provides a structured framework for interpreting and critiquing CEAs, highlighting how model structure, perspective, and assumptions affect conclusions about value. It provides guidance for critically appraising published CEAs and understanding their implications for clinical practice, resource allocation, and guideline development.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This article serves as a practical entry point for clinicians, researchers, and decision-makers seeking to understand and apply cost-effectiveness methods. It is intended to build foundational fluency in economic evaluation and support more informed engagement with value-based care, policy design, and evidence appraisal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"318 ","pages":"Pages 366-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In-Person and Virtual Interview Format for General Surgery Residency From an Applicant Perspective 从申请人的角度来看,普通外科住院医师的面对面和虚拟面试形式。
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.034
Maya Hammoud MD, Adam Ayoub BS, Robert Sawyer MD, Saad Shebrain MD

Introduction

While residency interviews have historically been in person, the majority of residency interviews transitioned to virtual interviews (VTIs) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since that time, in-person interviews (IPIs) have slowly been reintroduced. This study assesses applicant perceptions of VTI versus IPI formats.

Methods

Applicants to a single general surgery residency program were surveyed regarding factors that were important for ranking the programs, experience with IPI and VTI platforms, experience at our institution, and decision-making in choosing the program for interview and ranking. Primary outcomes evaluated were the differences between IPI and VTI from an applicant perspective.

Results

Of the 229 applicants interviewed at our institution and ranked for 18 y-1 positions in the 2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-2025 match cycles, 61 applicants (27%) responded with complete data to our survey (23 IPI, 30 VTI). Applicants in both groups (IPI versus VTI) reported fellowship prospects after graduation and geographic location to be important or extremely important in ranking programs (87.1%. versus 80.0%, P = 0.347). Applicants reported similar overall experiences at our institution. Candidates were more satisfied with in-person preinterview meeting with residents (93.5% IPI versus 63.3% VTI, P = 0.0043) and in-person hospital tours (80.6% IPI versus 53.3% VTI, P = 0.0244). More than half of applicants who interviewed virtually agreed or strongly agreed that financial considerations impacted their format selection, compared to one-third in the IPI (P = 0.221). Finally, more virtual interviewees agreed/strongly agreed that they would not have interviewed if not offered that format compared to IPI (30% VTI, 9% IPI, P = 0.11).

Conclusions

Overall, from the applicant perspective, there are few statistically significant differences between IPI and VTI. IPI is associated with better experiences at preinterview social events and during the hospital tours, but there was no difference in applicants’ abilities to rank the program based on interview format. Both IPI and VTI should continue to be offered.
导语:虽然住院医师面试历来都是面对面的,但由于COVID-19大流行,大多数住院医师面试都转变为虚拟面试(VTIs)。从那时起,面对面访谈(ipi)逐渐被重新引入。本研究评估了申请人对VTI和IPI格式的看法。方法:对单个普外科住院医师项目的申请人进行调查,包括对项目排名重要的因素、使用IPI和VTI平台的经验、在我院的经验以及选择项目进行面试和排名的决策。评估的主要结果是从申请人的角度来看IPI和VTI的差异。结果:在我校接受采访的229名申请人中,在2022-23、2023-24和2024-2025匹配周期中排名18 y-1职位,61名申请人(27%)对我们的调查(23名IPI, 30名VTI)做出了完整的回应。两组申请人(IPI和VTI)都表示,毕业后的奖学金前景和地理位置在排名项目中是重要或极其重要的(87.1%)。对比80.0%,P = 0.347)。申请人在我们机构的总体经历相似。面试前与住院医师面对面会面(93.5% IPI比63.3% VTI, P = 0.0043)和面对面医院参观(80.6% IPI比53.3% VTI, P = 0.0244)对应聘者更满意。超过一半的受访者几乎同意或强烈同意经济因素影响了他们的格式选择,而在IPI中只有三分之一(P = 0.221)。最后,与IPI相比,更多的虚拟受访者同意或强烈同意,如果没有这种形式,他们就不会接受采访(30% VTI, 9% IPI, P = 0.11)。结论:总的来说,从申请人的角度来看,IPI和VTI之间没有统计学意义上的差异。在面试前的社交活动和医院参观期间,IPI与更好的体验有关,但申请人根据面试形式对项目进行排名的能力没有差异。应继续提供IPI和VTI。
{"title":"In-Person and Virtual Interview Format for General Surgery Residency From an Applicant Perspective","authors":"Maya Hammoud MD,&nbsp;Adam Ayoub BS,&nbsp;Robert Sawyer MD,&nbsp;Saad Shebrain MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.034","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.034","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While residency interviews have historically been in person, the majority of residency interviews transitioned to virtual interviews (VTIs) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since that time, in-person interviews (IPIs) have slowly been reintroduced. This study assesses applicant perceptions of VTI <em>versus</em> IPI formats.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Applicants to a single general surgery residency program were surveyed regarding factors that were important for ranking the programs, experience with IPI and VTI platforms, experience at our institution, and decision-making in choosing the program for interview and ranking. Primary outcomes evaluated were the differences between IPI and VTI from an applicant perspective.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 229 applicants interviewed at our institution and ranked for 18 y-1 positions in the 2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-2025 match cycles, 61 applicants (27%) responded with complete data to our survey (23 IPI, 30 VTI). Applicants in both groups (IPI <em>versus</em> VTI) reported fellowship prospects after graduation and geographic location to be important or extremely important in ranking programs (87.1%. <em>versus</em> 80.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.347). Applicants reported similar overall experiences at our institution. Candidates were more satisfied with in-person preinterview meeting with residents (93.5% IPI <em>versus</em> 63.3% VTI, <em>P</em> = 0.0043) and in-person hospital tours (80.6% IPI <em>versus</em> 53.3% VTI, <em>P</em> = 0.0244). More than half of applicants who interviewed virtually agreed or strongly agreed that financial considerations impacted their format selection, compared to one-third in the IPI (<em>P</em> = 0.221). Finally, more virtual interviewees agreed/strongly agreed that they would not have interviewed if not offered that format compared to IPI (30% VTI, 9% IPI, <em>P</em> = 0.11).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall, from the applicant perspective, there are few statistically significant differences between IPI and VTI. IPI is associated with better experiences at preinterview social events and during the hospital tours, but there was no difference in applicants’ abilities to rank the program based on interview format. Both IPI and VTI should continue to be offered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"318 ","pages":"Pages 359-365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Liver Remnant Hypertrophy: A Model-Based Evaluation of Associated Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy Versus Liver Venous Deprivation 残肝肥厚:基于模型的肝分割和门静脉结扎对肝切除术和肝静脉剥夺的评估
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.043
Savannah R. Smith MD , Sarah M. Cheney MD , Juan M. Sarmiento MD, FACS

Introduction

Patients undergoing major hepatectomy require a future liver remnant (FLR) of at least 30%. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and liver venous deprivation (LVD) are hypertrophy techniques for inadequate FLR. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these techniques in patients with FLR <30%.

Methods

Via Markov modeling, we assessed clinical and economic outcomes of ALPPS and LVD. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (2022 USD), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were assessed. We conducted sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of our model to changes in input parameters.

Results

LVD resulted in 0.60 QALYs and $42,500; ALPPS accumulated 0.58 QALYs and $126,500. LVD was therefore preferred in the base case. Though LVD reduced costs, fewer simulated patients achieved hepatectomy due to disease progression while awaiting hypertrophy. If time to adequate hypertrophy for LVD was <30 d, LVD substantially increased QALYs compared to ALPPS.

Conclusions

LVD and ALPPS are both acceptable techniques. LVD is preferred from a cost-effectiveness standpoint; however, if time to adequate hypertrophy were reduced or patient selection optimized to ensure at least 90% of LVD patients achieve hepatectomy, LVD would substantially improve QALYs while still saving costs compared to ALPPS.
接受大肝切除术的患者要求未来肝残余(FLR)至少为30%。分阶段肝切除术(ALPPS)和肝静脉剥夺(LVD)相关联的肝分区和门静脉结扎是治疗FLR不足的肥厚技术。我们试图评估这些技术在FLR <;30%患者中的成本-效果。方法通过马尔可夫模型评估ALPPS和LVD的临床和经济效果。评估了质量调整生命年(QALYs)、成本(2022美元)和增量成本-效果比(ICERs)。我们进行了敏感性分析,以评估我们的模型对输入参数变化的稳健性。结果slvd产生0.60个qaly和42,500美元;ALPPS累计获得了0.58个QALYs和126,500美元。因此,在基本情况下首选LVD。虽然LVD降低了成本,但较少的模拟患者在等待肥厚时因疾病进展而实现肝切除术。如果LVD达到充分肥厚的时间为30天,与ALPPS相比,LVD显著增加了QALYs。结论slvd和ALPPS都是可行的方法。从成本效益的角度来看,LVD是首选;然而,如果减少到足够肥厚的时间或优化患者选择以确保至少90%的LVD患者实现肝切除术,LVD将大大改善QALYs,同时与ALPPS相比仍节省成本。
{"title":"Liver Remnant Hypertrophy: A Model-Based Evaluation of Associated Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy Versus Liver Venous Deprivation","authors":"Savannah R. Smith MD ,&nbsp;Sarah M. Cheney MD ,&nbsp;Juan M. Sarmiento MD, FACS","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.043","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.043","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients undergoing major hepatectomy require a future liver remnant (FLR) of at least 30%. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and liver venous deprivation (LVD) are hypertrophy techniques for inadequate FLR. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these techniques in patients with FLR &lt;30%.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Via Markov modeling, we assessed clinical and economic outcomes of ALPPS and LVD. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (2022 USD), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were assessed. We conducted sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of our model to changes in input parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>LVD resulted in 0.60 QALYs and $42,500; ALPPS accumulated 0.58 QALYs and $126,500. LVD was therefore preferred in the base case. Though LVD reduced costs, fewer simulated patients achieved hepatectomy due to disease progression while awaiting hypertrophy. If time to adequate hypertrophy for LVD was &lt;30 d, LVD substantially increased QALYs compared to ALPPS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LVD and ALPPS are both acceptable techniques. LVD is preferred from a cost-effectiveness standpoint; however, if time to adequate hypertrophy were reduced or patient selection optimized to ensure at least 90% of LVD patients achieve hepatectomy, LVD would substantially improve QALYs while still saving costs compared to ALPPS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"318 ","pages":"Pages 379-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risks of Failure in Advanced Trauma Life Support Courses 晚期创伤生命支持课程失败的风险
IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.005
Zachary C. Newman MD , David V. Deshpande BS , Jim Doherty MD , Sanja Nikolich MD , Leah Carey Tatebe MD , David A. Hampton MD, MEng , Judith Brasic RN , Timothy P. Plackett DO, MPH

Introduction

The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course is the common standard for care and disposition of trauma patients across both designated and nondesignated trauma centers. Evidence of individual student risk factors for ATLS course performance are minimal.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted using ATLS course data for hybrid student and refresher courses taught in 2022-2023 from a single American College of Surgeons Regional Committee on Trauma. Marginal performance was defined as a post-test score of < 80% on the written examination or failing the practical test on the first attempt. Univariable analysis by predictor was completed using the χ2 test and Mann–Whitney U tests, as appropriate. Multivariable analysis was completed with logistic regression analysis.

Results

Among 996 students in the study, 191 (19%) were identified as having marginal ATLS course performance. Marginal performance was significantly more common in the student course (24%) than in the refresher course (9%). Marginal performers differed by medical degree and training status, medical specialty, and level of their home institution trauma center designation. In regression analysis, lower pretest score was associated with higher odds of marginal performance. As compared to advanced practice providers, an attending physician status was associated with lower odds of marginal performance.

Conclusions

Marginal performance varies by specialty, training level, and home institution trauma center designation. Future work is needed to identify and support at-risk students in both initial and refresher hybrid ATLS courses.
高级创伤生命支持(ATLS)课程是指定和非指定创伤中心护理和处置创伤患者的通用标准。个别学生影响ATLS课程表现的风险因素的证据很少。方法回顾性研究美国外科医师学会创伤区域委员会2022-2023年混合型学生和进修课程的ATLS课程资料。边际成绩被定义为测试后笔试成绩达到80%或第一次实践测试不及格。采用χ2检验和Mann-Whitney U检验完成预测因子单变量分析。采用logistic回归分析完成多变量分析。结果996名学生中,191名(19%)被确定为ATLS课程表现不佳。边际表现在学生课程(24%)中明显比在进修课程(9%)中更为常见。边缘表现者在医学学位和培训状况、医学专业和家庭机构创伤中心指定水平上存在差异。在回归分析中,较低的预试得分与较高的边际表现几率相关。与高级执业医师相比,主治医师的身份与较低的边际绩效相关。结论创伤患者的边缘性表现因专科、培训水平和家庭创伤中心名称而异。未来的工作需要识别和支持有风险的学生在初始和进修混合ATLS课程。
{"title":"Risks of Failure in Advanced Trauma Life Support Courses","authors":"Zachary C. Newman MD ,&nbsp;David V. Deshpande BS ,&nbsp;Jim Doherty MD ,&nbsp;Sanja Nikolich MD ,&nbsp;Leah Carey Tatebe MD ,&nbsp;David A. Hampton MD, MEng ,&nbsp;Judith Brasic RN ,&nbsp;Timothy P. Plackett DO, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course is the common standard for care and disposition of trauma patients across both designated and nondesignated trauma centers. Evidence of individual student risk factors for ATLS course performance are minimal.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted using ATLS course data for hybrid student and refresher courses taught in 2022-2023 from a single American College of Surgeons Regional Committee on Trauma. Marginal performance was defined as a post-test score of &lt; 80% on the written examination or failing the practical test on the first attempt. Univariable analysis by predictor was completed using the <span><math><mrow><msup><mi>χ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> test and Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> tests, as appropriate. Multivariable analysis was completed with logistic regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 996 students in the study, 191 (19%) were identified as having marginal ATLS course performance. Marginal performance was significantly more common in the student course (24%) than in the refresher course (9%). Marginal performers differed by medical degree and training status, medical specialty, and level of their home institution trauma center designation. In regression analysis, lower pretest score was associated with higher odds of marginal performance. As compared to advanced practice providers, an attending physician status was associated with lower odds of marginal performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Marginal performance varies by specialty, training level, and home institution trauma center designation. Future work is needed to identify and support at-risk students in both initial and refresher hybrid ATLS courses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"319 ","pages":"Pages 18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146081860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Surgical Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1