Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.036
James J Park, Giles F Whalen, Isabel Cristina M Emmerick, Karl F Uy, Mark W Maxfield, Allison Crawford, Feiran Lou
Introduction: Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure designed to assess the overall short-term outcome of an operation. TO after esophagectomy with gastric conduit using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database has not yet been defined.
Methods: Records in the NSQIP Esophagectomy Procedure-Targeted database from 2016 to 2021 were analyzed. Patients who underwent elective esophagectomies with gastric conduit for resectable esophageal cancer were included. TO was defined as the absence of anastomotic leak, major complications, positive surgical margins, reintervention ≤30 d postsurgery, prolonged hospital stay (> 21 d), postoperative mortality ≤ 30 d after surgery, and readmission ≤ 30 d after discharge.
Results: Of the 6813 patients in the 2016-2021 NSQIP database who underwent esophagectomy, 3733 met study criteria. A total of 2520 (68%) patients achieved TO. The presence of a major complication most frequently prevented the achievement of TO (19%, 692/3733), while the presence of postoperative mortality ≤ 30 d after surgery least frequently prevented achievement of TO (2.3%). The most common complications were organ/space Surgical Site Infection (10%, 372/3733) and unplanned intubation (10%, 366/3733). Of the 493 patients who failed to achieve TO due to one parameter, positive margins (4.7%, 175/3733) and major complications (3.2%, 120/3733) most frequently prevented the achievement of TO. In a multivariable analysis, node stage of 2 or 3 in the TNM staging system, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 4, underweight body mass index, Asian race, prolonged operation time, increased preoperative white blood cell, and older age had statistically significant association with failure to achieve TO.
Conclusions: In an analysis of the NSQIP database, 68% of cases resulted in TO. Several factors were associated with failure to achieve TO. Further investigations are needed to test if modifying variables like preoperative weight can lead to improved outcomes.
{"title":"Textbook Outcomes After Esophagectomy with Gastric Conduit for Cancer: A 2016-2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.","authors":"James J Park, Giles F Whalen, Isabel Cristina M Emmerick, Karl F Uy, Mark W Maxfield, Allison Crawford, Feiran Lou","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure designed to assess the overall short-term outcome of an operation. TO after esophagectomy with gastric conduit using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database has not yet been defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records in the NSQIP Esophagectomy Procedure-Targeted database from 2016 to 2021 were analyzed. Patients who underwent elective esophagectomies with gastric conduit for resectable esophageal cancer were included. TO was defined as the absence of anastomotic leak, major complications, positive surgical margins, reintervention ≤30 d postsurgery, prolonged hospital stay (> 21 d), postoperative mortality ≤ 30 d after surgery, and readmission ≤ 30 d after discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6813 patients in the 2016-2021 NSQIP database who underwent esophagectomy, 3733 met study criteria. A total of 2520 (68%) patients achieved TO. The presence of a major complication most frequently prevented the achievement of TO (19%, 692/3733), while the presence of postoperative mortality ≤ 30 d after surgery least frequently prevented achievement of TO (2.3%). The most common complications were organ/space Surgical Site Infection (10%, 372/3733) and unplanned intubation (10%, 366/3733). Of the 493 patients who failed to achieve TO due to one parameter, positive margins (4.7%, 175/3733) and major complications (3.2%, 120/3733) most frequently prevented the achievement of TO. In a multivariable analysis, node stage of 2 or 3 in the TNM staging system, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 4, underweight body mass index, Asian race, prolonged operation time, increased preoperative white blood cell, and older age had statistically significant association with failure to achieve TO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In an analysis of the NSQIP database, 68% of cases resulted in TO. Several factors were associated with failure to achieve TO. Further investigations are needed to test if modifying variables like preoperative weight can lead to improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"319 ","pages":"66-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146137384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-05DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.069
Amir Masoud Karimi, Ali Hosseini
{"title":"Letter Regarding: Predicting Functional Outcomes in Adult Traumatic Brain Injuries Using the Base Deficit, International Normalized Ratio, and Glasgow Coma Scale Score.","authors":"Amir Masoud Karimi, Ali Hosseini","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.069","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-05DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.008
Rachel A Holstein, Courtney H Meyer, Olivia Herrmann, Alejandro De Leon Castro, James Walker, Samuel R Todd, Randi N Smith, Jonathan Nguyen, Jason D Sciarretta
Introduction: Pelvic fractures can cause severe hemorrhage and instability in trauma patients. The association between pelvic fracture morphology, venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, and clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study evaluates the incidence, risk factors, characteristics, and outcomes of VTE in hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult trauma patients with blunt pelvic ring disruptions and hemorrhagic shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) admitted to an American College of Surgeons-verified Level I adult trauma center between January 1, 2022 and May 31, 2023. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was in-hospital VTE. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality.
Results: Of 133 patients, 32 (24.1%) developed VTE (4.5% deep vein thrombosis alone, 12.8% pulmonary embolism alone, 6.8% both). VTE was diagnosed a median of 7 d after admission. Nearly all patients received early chemoprophylaxis (median initiation hospital day 1), with no differences in timing by VTE status or fracture pattern (P > 0.05). Fracture morphology was not independently associated with VTE. VTE was associated with longer intensive care unit LOS (11.5 versus 5.0 d, P < 0.001) and hospital LOS (20.5 versus 17.0 d, P = 0.028), though mortality did not differ. In multivariable regression, no independent associations were found between VTE and age, sex, body mass index, or injury severity score.
Conclusions: VTE was common despite early chemoprophylaxis. Fracture morphology did not independently predict VTE. Early VTE timing underscores the need for vigilant surveillance and uninterrupted prophylaxis. Prospective studies are needed.
骨盆骨折可导致创伤患者严重出血和不稳定。骨盆骨折形态、静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险和临床结果之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究评估血流动力学不稳定骨盆骨折中静脉血栓栓塞的发生率、危险因素、特征和结局。结果:133例患者中,32例(24.1%)发生静脉血栓栓塞(仅深静脉血栓形成4.5%,仅肺栓塞12.8%,两者均为6.8%)。静脉血栓栓塞的诊断中位时间为入院后7天。几乎所有患者都接受了早期化疗预防(中位数开始住院第1天),静脉血栓栓塞状态或骨折类型在时间上没有差异(P < 0.05)。骨折形态与静脉血栓栓塞没有独立的关系。静脉血栓栓塞与较长的重症监护病房LOS (11.5 d对5.0 d, P < 0.001)和医院LOS (20.5 d对17.0 d, P = 0.028)相关,但死亡率没有差异。在多变量回归中,没有发现静脉血栓栓塞与年龄、性别、体重指数或损伤严重程度评分之间的独立关联。结论:静脉血栓栓塞是常见的,尽管早期化疗预防。骨折形态不能独立预测静脉血栓栓塞。静脉血栓栓塞的早期时机强调了警惕监测和不间断预防的必要性。前瞻性研究是必要的。
{"title":"Incidence and Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures.","authors":"Rachel A Holstein, Courtney H Meyer, Olivia Herrmann, Alejandro De Leon Castro, James Walker, Samuel R Todd, Randi N Smith, Jonathan Nguyen, Jason D Sciarretta","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic fractures can cause severe hemorrhage and instability in trauma patients. The association between pelvic fracture morphology, venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, and clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study evaluates the incidence, risk factors, characteristics, and outcomes of VTE in hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adult trauma patients with blunt pelvic ring disruptions and hemorrhagic shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) admitted to an American College of Surgeons-verified Level I adult trauma center between January 1, 2022 and May 31, 2023. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was in-hospital VTE. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 133 patients, 32 (24.1%) developed VTE (4.5% deep vein thrombosis alone, 12.8% pulmonary embolism alone, 6.8% both). VTE was diagnosed a median of 7 d after admission. Nearly all patients received early chemoprophylaxis (median initiation hospital day 1), with no differences in timing by VTE status or fracture pattern (P > 0.05). Fracture morphology was not independently associated with VTE. VTE was associated with longer intensive care unit LOS (11.5 versus 5.0 d, P < 0.001) and hospital LOS (20.5 versus 17.0 d, P = 0.028), though mortality did not differ. In multivariable regression, no independent associations were found between VTE and age, sex, body mass index, or injury severity score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VTE was common despite early chemoprophylaxis. Fracture morphology did not independently predict VTE. Early VTE timing underscores the need for vigilant surveillance and uninterrupted prophylaxis. Prospective studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"319 ","pages":"47-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.004
Varun Jain, Colleen A McMullen, Joy I Kimbrough, Anna K Rockich, Daniel L Davenport, Gregory S Hawk, Barbara S Nikolajczyk, Philip A Kern, Simon J Fisher, Joshua P Steiner, William B Inabnet, Marlene E Starr
Introduction: Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment modality for individuals with morbid obesity, providing significant and durable weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonists have shown promise as weight loss drugs, in addition to their use in the treatment of metabolic disorders. While multimodal weight management is the standard of care for individuals with morbid obesity, the benefit of antecedent GLP-1 therapy prior to bariatric surgery has not been well-studied. The objective of this study is to conduct a clinical trial testing the hypothesis that preoperative treatment with a dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist enhances preoperative weight loss and decreases tissue inflammation, resulting in improved postoperative outcomes.
Materials and methods: We designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing preoperative treatment with tirzepatide versus standard medical care prior to minimally invasive bariatric surgery with a target enrollment of 50 patients randomized 1:1. For 3 mo preoperatively, the control arm will receive standard care in the form of dietary and lifestyle modification recommendations, whereas the treatment arm will receive weekly tirzepatide, in addition to standard care. Blood will be collected at enrollment through 12-mo postoperatively and analyzed for inflammatory and metabolic markers. Tissues (adipose, stomach, and liver) will be collected intraoperatively for transcriptome profiling and histological assessment.
Results: This is an ongoing trial with no reportable results.
Conclusion: Completion of this pilot RCT will provide data to support initiation of a multicenter RCT to determine therapeutic efficacy, and mechanisms of action, by which patients could benefit from preoperative treatment with tirzepatide.
{"title":"Preoperative Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Therapy in Bariatric Surgery Patients with Morbid Obesity (PreMO): Rationale and Study Design for a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Varun Jain, Colleen A McMullen, Joy I Kimbrough, Anna K Rockich, Daniel L Davenport, Gregory S Hawk, Barbara S Nikolajczyk, Philip A Kern, Simon J Fisher, Joshua P Steiner, William B Inabnet, Marlene E Starr","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment modality for individuals with morbid obesity, providing significant and durable weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonists have shown promise as weight loss drugs, in addition to their use in the treatment of metabolic disorders. While multimodal weight management is the standard of care for individuals with morbid obesity, the benefit of antecedent GLP-1 therapy prior to bariatric surgery has not been well-studied. The objective of this study is to conduct a clinical trial testing the hypothesis that preoperative treatment with a dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist enhances preoperative weight loss and decreases tissue inflammation, resulting in improved postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing preoperative treatment with tirzepatide versus standard medical care prior to minimally invasive bariatric surgery with a target enrollment of 50 patients randomized 1:1. For 3 mo preoperatively, the control arm will receive standard care in the form of dietary and lifestyle modification recommendations, whereas the treatment arm will receive weekly tirzepatide, in addition to standard care. Blood will be collected at enrollment through 12-mo postoperatively and analyzed for inflammatory and metabolic markers. Tissues (adipose, stomach, and liver) will be collected intraoperatively for transcriptome profiling and histological assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This is an ongoing trial with no reportable results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Completion of this pilot RCT will provide data to support initiation of a multicenter RCT to determine therapeutic efficacy, and mechanisms of action, by which patients could benefit from preoperative treatment with tirzepatide.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"319 ","pages":"58-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.074
Kayla A Fay, Karen E Schifferdecker, Linda M Kinney, Ellie J Kyung, Sean R Halloran, Samuel Youkilis, Shoshana H Bardach, Amanda N Perry, Maureen B Boardman, Rian M Hasson
Introduction: Best Practice Advisories (BPAs) are electronic medical record (EMR) tools that help increase uptake of recommended health care behaviors, such as cancer screenings, by identifying eligible patients and alerting providers. However, incomplete/inaccurate documentation within the EMR can be a potential barrier to BPA utility. The purpose of this work was to investigate the effectiveness of a BPA tool to identify eligible patients for lung cancer screening (LCS) using available EMR smoking histories.
Materials and methods: Retrospective observational review was conducted of a BPA programmed to identify LCS-eligible patients at a single quaternary, LCS-accredited, academic medical center. Programming targeted patients aged 50-77 y classified as "current" or "former smokers," excluding patients with recent lung computed tomography scans and/or lung cancer diagnoses. Data analyzed included frequency of BPA activation and the associated smoking history. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze outcomes.
Results: Between January 2017 and December 2021, there were 25,172 BPA activations, of which 11,701 were removed because they occurred outside a clinical/telehealth visit. This left 14,101 BPAs linked to 3150 patients. EMR information was not sufficient to calculate pack-year history for 48.9% (1541/3150), and the LCS order rate was 2.5% (78/3150). Although pulmonary disease specialists accounted for 13.7% (236/1721) of total LCS orders, the BPA did not activate for them.
Conclusions: Incomplete EMR data entry may contribute to the complexities of identifying LCS-eligible patients. This highlights the value of improving the completeness of EMR smoking history data and conducting targeted BPA audits to understand optimal activation parameters to improve clinician orders for LCS.
{"title":"Gaps in the Electronic Medical Record May Contribute to Low Participation in Lung Cancer Screening.","authors":"Kayla A Fay, Karen E Schifferdecker, Linda M Kinney, Ellie J Kyung, Sean R Halloran, Samuel Youkilis, Shoshana H Bardach, Amanda N Perry, Maureen B Boardman, Rian M Hasson","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.11.074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Best Practice Advisories (BPAs) are electronic medical record (EMR) tools that help increase uptake of recommended health care behaviors, such as cancer screenings, by identifying eligible patients and alerting providers. However, incomplete/inaccurate documentation within the EMR can be a potential barrier to BPA utility. The purpose of this work was to investigate the effectiveness of a BPA tool to identify eligible patients for lung cancer screening (LCS) using available EMR smoking histories.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective observational review was conducted of a BPA programmed to identify LCS-eligible patients at a single quaternary, LCS-accredited, academic medical center. Programming targeted patients aged 50-77 y classified as \"current\" or \"former smokers,\" excluding patients with recent lung computed tomography scans and/or lung cancer diagnoses. Data analyzed included frequency of BPA activation and the associated smoking history. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2017 and December 2021, there were 25,172 BPA activations, of which 11,701 were removed because they occurred outside a clinical/telehealth visit. This left 14,101 BPAs linked to 3150 patients. EMR information was not sufficient to calculate pack-year history for 48.9% (1541/3150), and the LCS order rate was 2.5% (78/3150). Although pulmonary disease specialists accounted for 13.7% (236/1721) of total LCS orders, the BPA did not activate for them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incomplete EMR data entry may contribute to the complexities of identifying LCS-eligible patients. This highlights the value of improving the completeness of EMR smoking history data and conducting targeted BPA audits to understand optimal activation parameters to improve clinician orders for LCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"319 ","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.003
Elisa Bass, Richard Butterfield, Ruth Bush, Linda Harris, Palma Shaw, Kellie Brown, Ellen Julian, Sarah McLaughlin, Young Erben
Introduction: With a projected shortage of over 30,000 surgeons by 2034, understanding and reducing nonretirement attrition is critical to maintaining a sustainable surgical workforce. Prior studies show higher attrition rates among women surgeons but have limited insight into the reasons behind these decisions. This study aims to identify the factors contributing to consideration of workforce attrition among women surgeons and to highlight modifiable elements that may support retention.
Methods: An anonymous online survey was distributed to the Association of Women Surgeons email list and women surgeons' WhatsApp groups between October and December 2024. Respondents were asked whether they had considered leaving the surgical workforce for reasons unrelated to retirement and about factors contributing to both their consideration of leaving and their decision to remain. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.
Results: The response rate was 15%. Of 371 total female respondents, 242 (65%) reported having considered or currently considering leaving surgery. The top reasons cited were poor work-life balance (71%), overly demanding work (57%), and discrimination or mistreatment (50%), among whom 96% reported gender-based discrimination. Primary factors for staying included financial necessity (61%), good patient relationships (60%), and collegial support (54%). Among those who considered but decided not to leave, improved work-life balance (43%), increased compensation (26%), and improved workplace relationships (26%) were the most common influences.
Conclusions: Attrition among women surgeons stems from systemic challenges. Interventions targeting work-life balance, compensation, and workplace inclusion may meaningfully support retention and help sustain a diverse and effective surgical workforce.
{"title":"Reasons for Women Surgeon Attrition From the US Workforce.","authors":"Elisa Bass, Richard Butterfield, Ruth Bush, Linda Harris, Palma Shaw, Kellie Brown, Ellen Julian, Sarah McLaughlin, Young Erben","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With a projected shortage of over 30,000 surgeons by 2034, understanding and reducing nonretirement attrition is critical to maintaining a sustainable surgical workforce. Prior studies show higher attrition rates among women surgeons but have limited insight into the reasons behind these decisions. This study aims to identify the factors contributing to consideration of workforce attrition among women surgeons and to highlight modifiable elements that may support retention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey was distributed to the Association of Women Surgeons email list and women surgeons' WhatsApp groups between October and December 2024. Respondents were asked whether they had considered leaving the surgical workforce for reasons unrelated to retirement and about factors contributing to both their consideration of leaving and their decision to remain. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 15%. Of 371 total female respondents, 242 (65%) reported having considered or currently considering leaving surgery. The top reasons cited were poor work-life balance (71%), overly demanding work (57%), and discrimination or mistreatment (50%), among whom 96% reported gender-based discrimination. Primary factors for staying included financial necessity (61%), good patient relationships (60%), and collegial support (54%). Among those who considered but decided not to leave, improved work-life balance (43%), increased compensation (26%), and improved workplace relationships (26%) were the most common influences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Attrition among women surgeons stems from systemic challenges. Interventions targeting work-life balance, compensation, and workplace inclusion may meaningfully support retention and help sustain a diverse and effective surgical workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"319 ","pages":"30-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146119316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.044
Yang Zhang MScPH, Grace E. Ratcliff MPH, Jinyi Zhu PhD
Introduction
As surgical care faces increasing financial scrutiny, there is a growing need for clinicians to understand the economic value of interventions. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) provides a structured approach to comparing clinical strategies in terms of both outcomes and costs; however, these methods remain underutilized and underappreciated in many surgical disciplines.
Materials and Methods
This article introduces foundational concepts in CEA, including comparative evaluation, quality-adjusted and disability-adjusted life years, cost estimation, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and modeling techniques such as decision trees, Markov models, and microsimulation. We also explain the role of sensitivity analyses in addressing uncertainty. Concepts are illustrated with examples relevant to surgical and policy decision-making.
Results
The explainer provides a structured framework for interpreting and critiquing CEAs, highlighting how model structure, perspective, and assumptions affect conclusions about value. It provides guidance for critically appraising published CEAs and understanding their implications for clinical practice, resource allocation, and guideline development.
Conclusions
This article serves as a practical entry point for clinicians, researchers, and decision-makers seeking to understand and apply cost-effectiveness methods. It is intended to build foundational fluency in economic evaluation and support more informed engagement with value-based care, policy design, and evidence appraisal.
{"title":"Cutting Costs, Saving Lives: A Surgeon's Guide to the Foundations of Cost-effectiveness Analysis","authors":"Yang Zhang MScPH, Grace E. Ratcliff MPH, Jinyi Zhu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.044","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.044","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>As surgical care faces increasing financial scrutiny, there is a growing need for clinicians to understand the economic value of interventions. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) provides a structured approach to comparing clinical strategies in terms of both outcomes and costs; however, these methods remain underutilized and underappreciated in many surgical disciplines.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This article introduces foundational concepts in CEA, including comparative evaluation, quality-adjusted and disability-adjusted life years, cost estimation, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and modeling techniques such as decision trees, Markov models, and microsimulation. We also explain the role of sensitivity analyses in addressing uncertainty. Concepts are illustrated with examples relevant to surgical and policy decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The explainer provides a structured framework for interpreting and critiquing CEAs, highlighting how model structure, perspective, and assumptions affect conclusions about value. It provides guidance for critically appraising published CEAs and understanding their implications for clinical practice, resource allocation, and guideline development.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This article serves as a practical entry point for clinicians, researchers, and decision-makers seeking to understand and apply cost-effectiveness methods. It is intended to build foundational fluency in economic evaluation and support more informed engagement with value-based care, policy design, and evidence appraisal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"318 ","pages":"Pages 366-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.034
Maya Hammoud MD, Adam Ayoub BS, Robert Sawyer MD, Saad Shebrain MD
Introduction
While residency interviews have historically been in person, the majority of residency interviews transitioned to virtual interviews (VTIs) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since that time, in-person interviews (IPIs) have slowly been reintroduced. This study assesses applicant perceptions of VTI versus IPI formats.
Methods
Applicants to a single general surgery residency program were surveyed regarding factors that were important for ranking the programs, experience with IPI and VTI platforms, experience at our institution, and decision-making in choosing the program for interview and ranking. Primary outcomes evaluated were the differences between IPI and VTI from an applicant perspective.
Results
Of the 229 applicants interviewed at our institution and ranked for 18 y-1 positions in the 2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-2025 match cycles, 61 applicants (27%) responded with complete data to our survey (23 IPI, 30 VTI). Applicants in both groups (IPI versus VTI) reported fellowship prospects after graduation and geographic location to be important or extremely important in ranking programs (87.1%. versus 80.0%, P = 0.347). Applicants reported similar overall experiences at our institution. Candidates were more satisfied with in-person preinterview meeting with residents (93.5% IPI versus 63.3% VTI, P = 0.0043) and in-person hospital tours (80.6% IPI versus 53.3% VTI, P = 0.0244). More than half of applicants who interviewed virtually agreed or strongly agreed that financial considerations impacted their format selection, compared to one-third in the IPI (P = 0.221). Finally, more virtual interviewees agreed/strongly agreed that they would not have interviewed if not offered that format compared to IPI (30% VTI, 9% IPI, P = 0.11).
Conclusions
Overall, from the applicant perspective, there are few statistically significant differences between IPI and VTI. IPI is associated with better experiences at preinterview social events and during the hospital tours, but there was no difference in applicants’ abilities to rank the program based on interview format. Both IPI and VTI should continue to be offered.
导语:虽然住院医师面试历来都是面对面的,但由于COVID-19大流行,大多数住院医师面试都转变为虚拟面试(VTIs)。从那时起,面对面访谈(ipi)逐渐被重新引入。本研究评估了申请人对VTI和IPI格式的看法。方法:对单个普外科住院医师项目的申请人进行调查,包括对项目排名重要的因素、使用IPI和VTI平台的经验、在我院的经验以及选择项目进行面试和排名的决策。评估的主要结果是从申请人的角度来看IPI和VTI的差异。结果:在我校接受采访的229名申请人中,在2022-23、2023-24和2024-2025匹配周期中排名18 y-1职位,61名申请人(27%)对我们的调查(23名IPI, 30名VTI)做出了完整的回应。两组申请人(IPI和VTI)都表示,毕业后的奖学金前景和地理位置在排名项目中是重要或极其重要的(87.1%)。对比80.0%,P = 0.347)。申请人在我们机构的总体经历相似。面试前与住院医师面对面会面(93.5% IPI比63.3% VTI, P = 0.0043)和面对面医院参观(80.6% IPI比53.3% VTI, P = 0.0244)对应聘者更满意。超过一半的受访者几乎同意或强烈同意经济因素影响了他们的格式选择,而在IPI中只有三分之一(P = 0.221)。最后,与IPI相比,更多的虚拟受访者同意或强烈同意,如果没有这种形式,他们就不会接受采访(30% VTI, 9% IPI, P = 0.11)。结论:总的来说,从申请人的角度来看,IPI和VTI之间没有统计学意义上的差异。在面试前的社交活动和医院参观期间,IPI与更好的体验有关,但申请人根据面试形式对项目进行排名的能力没有差异。应继续提供IPI和VTI。
{"title":"In-Person and Virtual Interview Format for General Surgery Residency From an Applicant Perspective","authors":"Maya Hammoud MD, Adam Ayoub BS, Robert Sawyer MD, Saad Shebrain MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.034","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.034","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>While residency interviews have historically been in person, the majority of residency interviews transitioned to virtual interviews (VTIs) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since that time, in-person interviews (IPIs) have slowly been reintroduced. This study assesses applicant perceptions of VTI <em>versus</em> IPI formats.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Applicants to a single general surgery residency program were surveyed regarding factors that were important for ranking the programs, experience with IPI and VTI platforms, experience at our institution, and decision-making in choosing the program for interview and ranking. Primary outcomes evaluated were the differences between IPI and VTI from an applicant perspective.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 229 applicants interviewed at our institution and ranked for 18 y-1 positions in the 2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-2025 match cycles, 61 applicants (27%) responded with complete data to our survey (23 IPI, 30 VTI). Applicants in both groups (IPI <em>versus</em> VTI) reported fellowship prospects after graduation and geographic location to be important or extremely important in ranking programs (87.1%. <em>versus</em> 80.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.347). Applicants reported similar overall experiences at our institution. Candidates were more satisfied with in-person preinterview meeting with residents (93.5% IPI <em>versus</em> 63.3% VTI, <em>P</em> = 0.0043) and in-person hospital tours (80.6% IPI <em>versus</em> 53.3% VTI, <em>P</em> = 0.0244). More than half of applicants who interviewed virtually agreed or strongly agreed that financial considerations impacted their format selection, compared to one-third in the IPI (<em>P</em> = 0.221). Finally, more virtual interviewees agreed/strongly agreed that they would not have interviewed if not offered that format compared to IPI (30% VTI, 9% IPI, <em>P</em> = 0.11).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall, from the applicant perspective, there are few statistically significant differences between IPI and VTI. IPI is associated with better experiences at preinterview social events and during the hospital tours, but there was no difference in applicants’ abilities to rank the program based on interview format. Both IPI and VTI should continue to be offered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"318 ","pages":"Pages 359-365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.043
Savannah R. Smith MD , Sarah M. Cheney MD , Juan M. Sarmiento MD, FACS
Introduction
Patients undergoing major hepatectomy require a future liver remnant (FLR) of at least 30%. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and liver venous deprivation (LVD) are hypertrophy techniques for inadequate FLR. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these techniques in patients with FLR <30%.
Methods
Via Markov modeling, we assessed clinical and economic outcomes of ALPPS and LVD. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (2022 USD), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were assessed. We conducted sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of our model to changes in input parameters.
Results
LVD resulted in 0.60 QALYs and $42,500; ALPPS accumulated 0.58 QALYs and $126,500. LVD was therefore preferred in the base case. Though LVD reduced costs, fewer simulated patients achieved hepatectomy due to disease progression while awaiting hypertrophy. If time to adequate hypertrophy for LVD was <30 d, LVD substantially increased QALYs compared to ALPPS.
Conclusions
LVD and ALPPS are both acceptable techniques. LVD is preferred from a cost-effectiveness standpoint; however, if time to adequate hypertrophy were reduced or patient selection optimized to ensure at least 90% of LVD patients achieve hepatectomy, LVD would substantially improve QALYs while still saving costs compared to ALPPS.
{"title":"Liver Remnant Hypertrophy: A Model-Based Evaluation of Associated Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy Versus Liver Venous Deprivation","authors":"Savannah R. Smith MD , Sarah M. Cheney MD , Juan M. Sarmiento MD, FACS","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.043","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.043","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients undergoing major hepatectomy require a future liver remnant (FLR) of at least 30%. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and liver venous deprivation (LVD) are hypertrophy techniques for inadequate FLR. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these techniques in patients with FLR <30%.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Via Markov modeling, we assessed clinical and economic outcomes of ALPPS and LVD. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (2022 USD), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were assessed. We conducted sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of our model to changes in input parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>LVD resulted in 0.60 QALYs and $42,500; ALPPS accumulated 0.58 QALYs and $126,500. LVD was therefore preferred in the base case. Though LVD reduced costs, fewer simulated patients achieved hepatectomy due to disease progression while awaiting hypertrophy. If time to adequate hypertrophy for LVD was <30 d, LVD substantially increased QALYs compared to ALPPS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LVD and ALPPS are both acceptable techniques. LVD is preferred from a cost-effectiveness standpoint; however, if time to adequate hypertrophy were reduced or patient selection optimized to ensure at least 90% of LVD patients achieve hepatectomy, LVD would substantially improve QALYs while still saving costs compared to ALPPS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"318 ","pages":"Pages 379-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-31DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.005
Zachary C. Newman MD , David V. Deshpande BS , Jim Doherty MD , Sanja Nikolich MD , Leah Carey Tatebe MD , David A. Hampton MD, MEng , Judith Brasic RN , Timothy P. Plackett DO, MPH
Introduction
The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course is the common standard for care and disposition of trauma patients across both designated and nondesignated trauma centers. Evidence of individual student risk factors for ATLS course performance are minimal.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted using ATLS course data for hybrid student and refresher courses taught in 2022-2023 from a single American College of Surgeons Regional Committee on Trauma. Marginal performance was defined as a post-test score of < 80% on the written examination or failing the practical test on the first attempt. Univariable analysis by predictor was completed using the test and Mann–Whitney U tests, as appropriate. Multivariable analysis was completed with logistic regression analysis.
Results
Among 996 students in the study, 191 (19%) were identified as having marginal ATLS course performance. Marginal performance was significantly more common in the student course (24%) than in the refresher course (9%). Marginal performers differed by medical degree and training status, medical specialty, and level of their home institution trauma center designation. In regression analysis, lower pretest score was associated with higher odds of marginal performance. As compared to advanced practice providers, an attending physician status was associated with lower odds of marginal performance.
Conclusions
Marginal performance varies by specialty, training level, and home institution trauma center designation. Future work is needed to identify and support at-risk students in both initial and refresher hybrid ATLS courses.
{"title":"Risks of Failure in Advanced Trauma Life Support Courses","authors":"Zachary C. Newman MD , David V. Deshpande BS , Jim Doherty MD , Sanja Nikolich MD , Leah Carey Tatebe MD , David A. Hampton MD, MEng , Judith Brasic RN , Timothy P. Plackett DO, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jss.2026.01.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course is the common standard for care and disposition of trauma patients across both designated and nondesignated trauma centers. Evidence of individual student risk factors for ATLS course performance are minimal.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted using ATLS course data for hybrid student and refresher courses taught in 2022-2023 from a single American College of Surgeons Regional Committee on Trauma. Marginal performance was defined as a post-test score of < 80% on the written examination or failing the practical test on the first attempt. Univariable analysis by predictor was completed using the <span><math><mrow><msup><mi>χ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> test and Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> tests, as appropriate. Multivariable analysis was completed with logistic regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 996 students in the study, 191 (19%) were identified as having marginal ATLS course performance. Marginal performance was significantly more common in the student course (24%) than in the refresher course (9%). Marginal performers differed by medical degree and training status, medical specialty, and level of their home institution trauma center designation. In regression analysis, lower pretest score was associated with higher odds of marginal performance. As compared to advanced practice providers, an attending physician status was associated with lower odds of marginal performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Marginal performance varies by specialty, training level, and home institution trauma center designation. Future work is needed to identify and support at-risk students in both initial and refresher hybrid ATLS courses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"319 ","pages":"Pages 18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146081860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}