The Effect of Stenting on Post-Stenotic Dilatation in Coarctation of The Aorta.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pediatric Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1007/s00246-024-03664-w
Elchanan Bruckheimer, Nili Schamroth Pravda, Yuval Barak-Corren, Alexander Lowenthal, Gabi Amir, Roee Arnon, Idan Shaul, Tamir Dagan, Einat Birk
{"title":"The Effect of Stenting on Post-Stenotic Dilatation in Coarctation of The Aorta.","authors":"Elchanan Bruckheimer, Nili Schamroth Pravda, Yuval Barak-Corren, Alexander Lowenthal, Gabi Amir, Roee Arnon, Idan Shaul, Tamir Dagan, Einat Birk","doi":"10.1007/s00246-024-03664-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of stenting of native aortic coarctation (CoA) on post-stenotic dilatation (PSD) has not been previously described. We hypothesized that CoA stenting may lead to positive remodeling of PSD. Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent stent implantation for native CoA from 1999 to 2021 was performed. Primary outcome was incremental change PSD diameter and the PSD/DescAo (Descending Aorta) following stent implantation and comparison between covered and bare-metal stents. 90 consecutive patients, (26 female, average age at first intervention 12.0 years) were included. 35 patients (38.9%) underwent dilatation with bare-metal stents and 55 patients (61.1%) with covered stents. The covered stent subgroup was older (14.0 vs. 9.2 years old, p < 0.001) and PSD was larger (17.0 vs 14.0 mm, p < 0.001). Over a mean of 3.2 years, mean inter-catheterization growth of the PSD was blunted [- 0.05 mm, 95% CI (- 1.5 to 1.4)]. The covered stent subgroup demonstrated a negative inter-catheterization growth compared to the bare-metal stent subgroup (- 0.7 vs 1.6 mm, p < 0.001). When controlled for somatic growth, the PDS/DescAo decreased more significantly among those with covered stent vs bare metal (- 0.12 vs - 0.058, p = 0.004). Stenting of native CoA blunts the growth of PSD; covered stents were significantly associated with regression of the diameter of the PSD over time compared to bare-metal stents.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03664-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of stenting of native aortic coarctation (CoA) on post-stenotic dilatation (PSD) has not been previously described. We hypothesized that CoA stenting may lead to positive remodeling of PSD. Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent stent implantation for native CoA from 1999 to 2021 was performed. Primary outcome was incremental change PSD diameter and the PSD/DescAo (Descending Aorta) following stent implantation and comparison between covered and bare-metal stents. 90 consecutive patients, (26 female, average age at first intervention 12.0 years) were included. 35 patients (38.9%) underwent dilatation with bare-metal stents and 55 patients (61.1%) with covered stents. The covered stent subgroup was older (14.0 vs. 9.2 years old, p < 0.001) and PSD was larger (17.0 vs 14.0 mm, p < 0.001). Over a mean of 3.2 years, mean inter-catheterization growth of the PSD was blunted [- 0.05 mm, 95% CI (- 1.5 to 1.4)]. The covered stent subgroup demonstrated a negative inter-catheterization growth compared to the bare-metal stent subgroup (- 0.7 vs 1.6 mm, p < 0.001). When controlled for somatic growth, the PDS/DescAo decreased more significantly among those with covered stent vs bare metal (- 0.12 vs - 0.058, p = 0.004). Stenting of native CoA blunts the growth of PSD; covered stents were significantly associated with regression of the diameter of the PSD over time compared to bare-metal stents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支架植入对主动脉瓣狭窄后扩张的影响
关于原发性主动脉瓣狭窄(CoA)支架植入术对狭窄后扩张(PSD)的影响,此前尚未有描述。我们假设,CoA 支架植入术可能会导致 PSD 的正向重塑。我们对 1999 年至 2021 年期间因原生 CoA 而接受支架植入术的患者进行了回顾性分析。主要结果是支架植入后 PSD 直径和 PSD/DescAo(降主动脉)的增量变化,以及覆盖支架和裸金属支架之间的比较。共纳入 90 名连续患者(26 名女性,首次介入治疗的平均年龄为 12.0 岁)。35名患者(38.9%)接受了裸金属支架扩张术,55名患者(61.1%)接受了覆膜支架扩张术。使用覆盖支架的亚组患者年龄更大(14.0 岁对 9.2 岁,P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Four-Dimensional Flow MRI, Two-Dimensional Phase-Contrast MRI and Echocardiography in Transposition of the Great Arteries. A Challenging Interventional Procedure: Transcatheter Closure of Tubular Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension. Impact of Residual Lesion Severity on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Following Congenital Heart Surgery in Infancy and Childhood. Risk Stratification in Pediatric Wolff-Parkinson-White: Practice Variation Among Pediatric Cardiologists and Electrophysiologists. Outcomes of Infant Supraventricular Tachycardia Management Without Medication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1