Functioning of post-COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study at the outpatient clinic for long-term effects.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1080/02813432.2024.2410986
Sanna Stålnacke, Helena Liira, Velina Vangelova-Korpinen, Hélène Virrantaus, Mari Kanerva, Kirsi Kvarnström, Markku Sainio, Antti Malmivaara, Aki Vuokko, Mikko Varonen, Mikko Venäläinen, Jari Arokoski
{"title":"Functioning of post-COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study at the outpatient clinic for long-term effects.","authors":"Sanna Stålnacke, Helena Liira, Velina Vangelova-Korpinen, Hélène Virrantaus, Mari Kanerva, Kirsi Kvarnström, Markku Sainio, Antti Malmivaara, Aki Vuokko, Mikko Varonen, Mikko Venäläinen, Jari Arokoski","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2410986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After COVID-19 infection, long-term impacts on functioning may occur. We studied the functioning of patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) and compared them to controls without PCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study consisted of 442 patients with PCC referred to rehabilitation at the Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) Outpatient Clinic for the Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, and 198 controls without PCC. Functioning was assessed with a questionnaire including WHODAS 2.0. Patients underwent physical testing including a hand grip strength test (HGST) and a 6-minute walking test (6MWT). Lifestyle was assessed by questionnaire and comorbidities were collected as ICD-10 codes from the HUS Data Lake on the HUS Acamedic platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WHODAS 2.0 average total score was 34 (SD 18) (moderate functional limitation) for patients with PCC and 6 (SD 8) (normal or mild limitation) for the controls. The disability was higher in all aspects of WHODAS 2.0 in patients with PCC. Bivariate binomial and multivariable regression analyses showed that the presence of comorbidities, anxiety, depression, and smoking predicted a WHODAS 2.0 score of 24 (moderate functional limitation) or above in the PCC group. The average 6MWT distance was 435 m (SD 98 m) in patients with PCC and 627 m (SD 70 m) in controls. HGST measurements showed no significant differences from controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, patients with PCC had significantly reduced functioning based on WHODAS 2.0 scores and the 6MWT results. Comorbidities, anxiety, depression, and smoking were associated with moderate or severe limitations in functioning. Findings support that PCC is multifactorial and requires a holistic approach to rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"155-163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2410986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: After COVID-19 infection, long-term impacts on functioning may occur. We studied the functioning of patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) and compared them to controls without PCC.

Methods: This cross-sectional study consisted of 442 patients with PCC referred to rehabilitation at the Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) Outpatient Clinic for the Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, and 198 controls without PCC. Functioning was assessed with a questionnaire including WHODAS 2.0. Patients underwent physical testing including a hand grip strength test (HGST) and a 6-minute walking test (6MWT). Lifestyle was assessed by questionnaire and comorbidities were collected as ICD-10 codes from the HUS Data Lake on the HUS Acamedic platform.

Results: The WHODAS 2.0 average total score was 34 (SD 18) (moderate functional limitation) for patients with PCC and 6 (SD 8) (normal or mild limitation) for the controls. The disability was higher in all aspects of WHODAS 2.0 in patients with PCC. Bivariate binomial and multivariable regression analyses showed that the presence of comorbidities, anxiety, depression, and smoking predicted a WHODAS 2.0 score of 24 (moderate functional limitation) or above in the PCC group. The average 6MWT distance was 435 m (SD 98 m) in patients with PCC and 627 m (SD 70 m) in controls. HGST measurements showed no significant differences from controls.

Conclusions: In conclusion, patients with PCC had significantly reduced functioning based on WHODAS 2.0 scores and the 6MWT results. Comorbidities, anxiety, depression, and smoking were associated with moderate or severe limitations in functioning. Findings support that PCC is multifactorial and requires a holistic approach to rehabilitation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19后患者的功能:门诊长期影响的横断面研究。
背景:感染 COVID-19 后,功能可能会受到长期影响。我们研究了 COVID-19 后遗症(PCC)患者的功能,并将其与无 PCC 的对照组进行了比较:这项横断面研究包括442名转诊到赫尔辛基大学医院(HUS)COVID-19长期影响门诊进行康复治疗的PCC患者和198名未患PCC的对照组患者。功能评估采用包括 WHODAS 2.0 在内的调查问卷。患者接受了包括手握力测试(HGST)和 6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)在内的体能测试。生活方式通过问卷调查进行评估,合并症通过HUS Acamedic平台上的HUS数据湖收集ICD-10代码:结果:PCC患者的WHODAS 2.0平均总分为34分(标准差为18分)(中度功能受限),对照组为6分(标准差为8分)(正常或轻度功能受限)。PCC 患者在 WHODAS 2.0 各方面的残疾程度都较高。二元二项式和多变量回归分析表明,合并症、焦虑、抑郁和吸烟可预测PCC组患者的WHODAS 2.0得分达到或超过24分(中度功能受限)。PCC 患者的 6MWT 平均距离为 435 米(标清 98 米),对照组为 627 米(标清 70 米)。HGST测量结果与对照组无明显差异:总之,根据 WHODAS 2.0 评分和 6MWT 结果,PCC 患者的功能明显减退。合并症、焦虑、抑郁和吸烟与中度或重度功能限制有关。研究结果表明,PCC 是一种多因素疾病,需要采用整体康复方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
期刊最新文献
Exploring nurse practitioners' collaboration with general practitioners in Norwegian homecare services: a qualitative study. Health determinants among participants in targeted health dialogues offered to all 40-year-old individuals in a metropolitan region of 1.4 million people. Task shifting for musculoskeletal disorders in Norwegian primary care: a qualitative interview study of general practitioners and specialist musculoskeletal physiotherapists. Between principles and pragmatism - primary healthcare and social services professionals' experiences and perceptions of self-care for older adults with home care: a qualitative study. Primary care physicians' experiences of video and online chat consultations: a qualitative descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1