Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Positive Mental Health Program for Adults: Study Protocol.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Public Health Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1111/phn.13427
Sónia Manuela Almeida Teixeira, Carme Ferré-Grau, Carlos Alberto da Cruz Sequeira, José Manuel Santos, Maria Manuela Guerra, Maria Teresa Lluch
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Positive Mental Health Program for Adults: Study Protocol.","authors":"Sónia Manuela Almeida Teixeira, Carme Ferré-Grau, Carlos Alberto da Cruz Sequeira, José Manuel Santos, Maria Manuela Guerra, Maria Teresa Lluch","doi":"10.1111/phn.13427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of a positive mental health program for adults (PMHP) in the community.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Positive mental health (PMH) can be seen as a construct represented by six factors (personal satisfaction, prosocial attitude, self-control, autonomy, problem resolution, and self-actualization, and interpersonal relationship skills) according to the Multifactorial Model for PMH. Although there are several interventions in promoting mental health, research on effective promotion of PMH for adults in the community with structured and validated programs of PMH is scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial (RCT) following a wait-list control design, aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a PMHP in the community. This study was approved in June 2019 by the Ethics Committee. Participants will be recruited from the school community of teachers. Participants aged ≥ 18 years. The participants will be randomized 1:1 to either (a) an intervention group, which will integrate the PMHP, or (b) the standby control group. Three assessment moments for both groups will take place initial, after the intervention, and a follow-up of 3-6 months. The evaluation instruments will include a sociodemographic questionnaire, a PMH questionnaire, and a psychological vulnerability scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study provides an innovative approach to PMH. Further, the study may demonstrate new interventions in PMH in the community, based on a program with systematized guidelines and sessions structured according to individual needs. It is expected that at the end of the program, the experimental group will increase the level of PMH.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>To allow future official implementation of the PMH program and the replication of the study in other professional groups as a promotion tool.</p><p><strong>No patient or public contribution: </strong>There was no funding to remunerate a participant for this study.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04600401. Registered on May 15, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":54533,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of a positive mental health program for adults (PMHP) in the community.

Background: Positive mental health (PMH) can be seen as a construct represented by six factors (personal satisfaction, prosocial attitude, self-control, autonomy, problem resolution, and self-actualization, and interpersonal relationship skills) according to the Multifactorial Model for PMH. Although there are several interventions in promoting mental health, research on effective promotion of PMH for adults in the community with structured and validated programs of PMH is scarce.

Methods: This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial (RCT) following a wait-list control design, aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a PMHP in the community. This study was approved in June 2019 by the Ethics Committee. Participants will be recruited from the school community of teachers. Participants aged ≥ 18 years. The participants will be randomized 1:1 to either (a) an intervention group, which will integrate the PMHP, or (b) the standby control group. Three assessment moments for both groups will take place initial, after the intervention, and a follow-up of 3-6 months. The evaluation instruments will include a sociodemographic questionnaire, a PMH questionnaire, and a psychological vulnerability scale.

Conclusion: The current study provides an innovative approach to PMH. Further, the study may demonstrate new interventions in PMH in the community, based on a program with systematized guidelines and sessions structured according to individual needs. It is expected that at the end of the program, the experimental group will increase the level of PMH.

Relevance to clinical practice: To allow future official implementation of the PMH program and the replication of the study in other professional groups as a promotion tool.

No patient or public contribution: There was no funding to remunerate a participant for this study.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04600401. Registered on May 15, 2020.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估成人积极心理健康计划有效性的随机对照试验:研究方案。
目的:评估社区成人积极心理健康计划(PMHP)的有效性:根据积极心理健康多因素模型(Multifactorial Model for PMH),积极心理健康(PMH)可被视为由六个因素(个人满意度、亲社会态度、自我控制、自主性、问题解决和自我实现以及人际关系技巧)构成的一个建构。虽然目前有多种促进心理健康的干预措施,但通过结构化的、经过验证的心理健康项目来有效促进社区成人心理健康的研究还很少:本研究方案介绍了一项采用候补对照设计的随机对照试验(RCT),旨在评估社区中预防心理健康计划的有效性。本研究于 2019 年 6 月获得伦理委员会批准。参与者将从学校教师群体中招募。参与者年龄≥18岁。参与者将以1:1的比例随机分配到(a)干预组(将整合PMHP)或(b)备用对照组。两组人员将分别在干预初期、干预结束后和 3-6 个月的随访期间接受三次评估。评估工具包括社会人口调查表、PMH 调查表和心理脆弱性量表:目前的研究为 PMH 提供了一种创新方法。此外,这项研究还可以展示社区 PMH 的新干预措施,其基础是一项具有系统化指导原则的计划,以及根据个人需求安排的课程。与临床实践的相关性:与临床实践的相关性:今后可正式实施预防性保健计划,并在其他专业团体中推广这项研究,将其作为一种推广工具:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT04600401。注册日期:2020年5月15日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nursing
Public Health Nursing 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Nursing publishes empirical research reports, program evaluations, and case reports focused on populations at risk across the lifespan. The journal also prints articles related to developments in practice, education of public health nurses, theory development, methodological innovations, legal, ethical, and public policy issues in public health, and the history of public health nursing throughout the world. While the primary readership of the Journal is North American, the journal is expanding its mission to address global public health concerns of interest to nurses.
期刊最新文献
Designing a Nurse-Led eHealth Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: Insights From Participant Experiences and Qualitative Feedback. Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Positive Mental Health Program for Adults: Study Protocol. Exploring barriers and facilitators to feeding children with minimal or no "Junk Food": Insights from Mexican women. Exploring the Relationship Between Cyberbullying and Technology Addiction in Adolescents. eHealth Interventions of Health Literacy for Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1