Differences in Attentional Bias Toward e-Cigarette Cues Between e-Cigarette Users and Nonusers.

Seok Hyun Gwon, Youngjoo Cho, Yourim Kim, Suna Paek, Han-Joo Lee
{"title":"Differences in Attentional Bias Toward e-Cigarette Cues Between e-Cigarette Users and Nonusers.","authors":"Seok Hyun Gwon, Youngjoo Cho, Yourim Kim, Suna Paek, Han-Joo Lee","doi":"10.1097/JAN.0000000000000590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) has increased rapidly in recent years, particularly among young adults. There is a dearth of research on the cognitive factors that contribute to ENDS use. One of the possible cognitive mechanisms involved with addictive behavior is attentional bias (AB). AB can manifest as either facilitated attention engagement toward or delayed attention disengagement from a relevant stimulus. The purpose of this study was to examine the difference in AB toward ENDS-related cues between ENDS users and non-ENDS users. ENDS users (n = 29) and nonusers (n = 24) between the ages of 18 and 29 years participated in the dot-probe and eye-tracking picture-viewing tasks. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the variance of AB between the two groups. In the eye-tracking task, ENDS users displayed significantly greater net dwell time and fixation time at time frames of 6-9, 9-12, and 12-15 seconds, compared to nonusers. It is noteworthy that ENDS users exhibited attentional fluctuation toward ENDS cues as well as difficulties disengaging attention from ENDS cues. The current findings offer insight into the nature of attentional processes associated with ENDS cues and provide useful data to guide the development of a nurse-led cognitive intervention focusing on biased attentional processing related to ENDS cues.</p>","PeriodicalId":94062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of addictions nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of addictions nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) has increased rapidly in recent years, particularly among young adults. There is a dearth of research on the cognitive factors that contribute to ENDS use. One of the possible cognitive mechanisms involved with addictive behavior is attentional bias (AB). AB can manifest as either facilitated attention engagement toward or delayed attention disengagement from a relevant stimulus. The purpose of this study was to examine the difference in AB toward ENDS-related cues between ENDS users and non-ENDS users. ENDS users (n = 29) and nonusers (n = 24) between the ages of 18 and 29 years participated in the dot-probe and eye-tracking picture-viewing tasks. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the variance of AB between the two groups. In the eye-tracking task, ENDS users displayed significantly greater net dwell time and fixation time at time frames of 6-9, 9-12, and 12-15 seconds, compared to nonusers. It is noteworthy that ENDS users exhibited attentional fluctuation toward ENDS cues as well as difficulties disengaging attention from ENDS cues. The current findings offer insight into the nature of attentional processes associated with ENDS cues and provide useful data to guide the development of a nurse-led cognitive intervention focusing on biased attentional processing related to ENDS cues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子烟使用者和非使用者对电子烟线索的注意偏差差异。
摘要:近年来,电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS)的使用量迅速增加,尤其是在年轻人当中。有关导致使用 ENDS 的认知因素的研究还很缺乏。成瘾行为可能涉及的认知机制之一是注意偏差(AB)。注意偏差既可以表现为对相关刺激的注意参与促进,也可以表现为对相关刺激的注意脱离延迟。本研究旨在考察ENDS使用者和非ENDS使用者对ENDS相关线索的注意偏差差异。年龄在 18-29 岁之间的ENDS使用者(29 人)和非使用者(24 人)参加了点探测和眼动追踪图片浏览任务。结果显示,两组人的 AB 方差有显著差异。在眼动追踪任务中,与非使用者相比,ENDS使用者在6-9秒、9-12秒和12-15秒的时间范围内显示出明显更长的净停留时间和固定时间。值得注意的是,ENDS 使用者对ENDS 提示表现出注意力波动,而且很难从ENDS 提示中转移注意力。目前的研究结果让人们深入了解了与ENDS线索相关的注意过程的性质,并提供了有用的数据来指导护士主导的认知干预的发展,该干预侧重于与ENDS线索相关的有偏差的注意过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Barriers and Facilitators to Recruitment of a Multifaceted Population of Opioid Use Disorder Community Stakeholders. Differences in Attentional Bias Toward e-Cigarette Cues Between e-Cigarette Users and Nonusers. Implementing an Updated Alcohol Withdrawal Symptom Management Order Set Focused on Patient Safety. Implementing an Updated Alcohol Withdrawal Symptom Management Order Set Focused on Patient Safety. Improving Linkage for Patients With Injection-Drug-Use-Related Endocarditis and Osteomyelitis to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Through a Telephone Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1