Meghan L. Butryn, Nicole A. Miller, Charlotte J. Hagerman, Danielle Arigo, Erica LaFata, Fengqing Zhang, Bonnie Spring, Evan Forman
{"title":"Coach access to digital self-monitoring data: an experimental test of short-term effects in behavioral weight-loss treatment","authors":"Meghan L. Butryn, Nicole A. Miller, Charlotte J. Hagerman, Danielle Arigo, Erica LaFata, Fengqing Zhang, Bonnie Spring, Evan Forman","doi":"10.1002/oby.24138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study experimentally tested whether coach access to participants' digital self-monitoring data improved behavioral weight-loss outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants (<i>N</i> = 322) received 12 weeks of group-based behavioral weight-loss sessions via videoconference and were instructed to engage in daily self-monitoring of weight, physical activity (PA), and dietary intake. For participants who were randomly assigned to Coach Share ON (<i>n</i> = 161), coaches regularly accessed a web-based portal that displayed data from the participants' scale, PA sensor, and food record.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Weight loss at 12 weeks was significantly greater in Coach Share ON versus OFF (6.2% vs. 5.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.04). Self-monitoring of PA (98.70% vs. 97.40% of days; <i>p</i> = 0.006) and eating (98.05% vs. 93.51% of days; <i>p</i> = 0.007) was more frequent in Coach Share ON versus OFF. There were no significant differences by condition in PA (<i>p</i> = 0.57), attendance (<i>p</i> = 0.42), working alliance (<i>p</i> = 0.62), or self-monitoring of weight (<i>p</i> = 0.12). Perceived supportive accountability was significantly greater in Coach Share ON versus OFF (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The short-term efficacy of behavioral weight loss was greater when coaches had direct access to self-monitoring device data. Notably, there also was no evidence of iatrogenic effects of data sharing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"32 11","pages":"2111-2119"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study experimentally tested whether coach access to participants' digital self-monitoring data improved behavioral weight-loss outcomes.
Methods
Participants (N = 322) received 12 weeks of group-based behavioral weight-loss sessions via videoconference and were instructed to engage in daily self-monitoring of weight, physical activity (PA), and dietary intake. For participants who were randomly assigned to Coach Share ON (n = 161), coaches regularly accessed a web-based portal that displayed data from the participants' scale, PA sensor, and food record.
Results
Weight loss at 12 weeks was significantly greater in Coach Share ON versus OFF (6.2% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.04). Self-monitoring of PA (98.70% vs. 97.40% of days; p = 0.006) and eating (98.05% vs. 93.51% of days; p = 0.007) was more frequent in Coach Share ON versus OFF. There were no significant differences by condition in PA (p = 0.57), attendance (p = 0.42), working alliance (p = 0.62), or self-monitoring of weight (p = 0.12). Perceived supportive accountability was significantly greater in Coach Share ON versus OFF (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
The short-term efficacy of behavioral weight loss was greater when coaches had direct access to self-monitoring device data. Notably, there also was no evidence of iatrogenic effects of data sharing.
期刊介绍:
Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.