B-119 Comparative performance of GPT-4 and CNV-ETLAI in extracting copy number variations from medical journals: Bridging the gap between large language models and specialized NLP tools in genomic data interpretation

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.480
J Choi
{"title":"B-119 Comparative performance of GPT-4 and CNV-ETLAI in extracting copy number variations from medical journals: Bridging the gap between large language models and specialized NLP tools in genomic data interpretation","authors":"J Choi","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Copy Number Variations (CNVs) are critical genetic markers in diversity and disease, yet their accurate extraction from medical literature remains challenging due to the complexity of genetic data. While specialized NLP models like CNV-ETLAI have been developed for this task, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 presents a potential alternative with broader applicability. This study evaluates the efficacy of GPT-4 against CNV-ETLAI in extracting CNVs from medical journal articles, aiming to enhance genetic research and clinical decision-making. Methods We configured GPT-4 to process and interpret medical journal PDFs, designing custom prompts for CNV information extraction. The performance of GPT-4 was benchmarked against CNV-ETLAI using a dataset of 146 true positive CNVs extracted from 23 journal articles. Performance metrics focused on accuracy in extracting CNVs from both text and tables, recognizing the importance of structured data interpretation in genomic analysis. Results CNV-ETLAI demonstrated superior accuracy, achieving a 98% success rate in CNV extraction, compared to GPT-4’s 49%. Specifically, CNV-ETLAI outperformed GPT-4 in table extraction accuracy (99% vs. 41.2%) and context extraction accuracy (96% vs. 63.2%). Despite GPT-4's lower performance, its capacity for improvement and adaptability was noted, indicating potential future applicability in medical data extraction. Conclusions The study highlights CNV-ETLAI's current superiority in extracting CNVs from medical texts, particularly in interpreting structured data like tables. However, the adaptability and potential for growth in LLMs like GPT-4 suggest they could soon become valuable tools for medical data extraction, offering a more versatile and powerful solution across a broader range of applications. The promise of LLMs, despite their current limitations, underscores the need for continued research and development in AI technologies for genomic data interpretation.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.480","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Copy Number Variations (CNVs) are critical genetic markers in diversity and disease, yet their accurate extraction from medical literature remains challenging due to the complexity of genetic data. While specialized NLP models like CNV-ETLAI have been developed for this task, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 presents a potential alternative with broader applicability. This study evaluates the efficacy of GPT-4 against CNV-ETLAI in extracting CNVs from medical journal articles, aiming to enhance genetic research and clinical decision-making. Methods We configured GPT-4 to process and interpret medical journal PDFs, designing custom prompts for CNV information extraction. The performance of GPT-4 was benchmarked against CNV-ETLAI using a dataset of 146 true positive CNVs extracted from 23 journal articles. Performance metrics focused on accuracy in extracting CNVs from both text and tables, recognizing the importance of structured data interpretation in genomic analysis. Results CNV-ETLAI demonstrated superior accuracy, achieving a 98% success rate in CNV extraction, compared to GPT-4’s 49%. Specifically, CNV-ETLAI outperformed GPT-4 in table extraction accuracy (99% vs. 41.2%) and context extraction accuracy (96% vs. 63.2%). Despite GPT-4's lower performance, its capacity for improvement and adaptability was noted, indicating potential future applicability in medical data extraction. Conclusions The study highlights CNV-ETLAI's current superiority in extracting CNVs from medical texts, particularly in interpreting structured data like tables. However, the adaptability and potential for growth in LLMs like GPT-4 suggest they could soon become valuable tools for medical data extraction, offering a more versatile and powerful solution across a broader range of applications. The promise of LLMs, despite their current limitations, underscores the need for continued research and development in AI technologies for genomic data interpretation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
B-119 GPT-4 和 CNV-ETLAI 从医学期刊中提取拷贝数变异的性能比较:缩小基因组数据解读中大型语言模型与专业 NLP 工具之间的差距
背景拷贝数变异(CNV)是多样性和疾病中的重要遗传标记,但由于遗传数据的复杂性,从医学文献中准确提取这些变异仍然具有挑战性。虽然已经开发了专门的 NLP 模型(如 CNV-ETAI)来完成这项任务,但大语言模型(LLM)(如 GPT-4)的出现提供了一种具有更广泛适用性的潜在替代方案。本研究评估了 GPT-4 与 CNV-ETLAI 在从医学期刊文章中提取 CNV 方面的功效,旨在加强遗传学研究和临床决策。方法 我们配置了 GPT-4 来处理和解释医学期刊 PDF,并设计了用于 CNV 信息提取的自定义提示。我们使用从 23 篇期刊论文中提取的 146 个真阳性 CNV 数据集,将 GPT-4 的性能与 CNV-ETLAI 进行了比较。性能指标主要集中在从文本和表格中提取 CNV 的准确性上,这充分体现了结构化数据解释在基因组分析中的重要性。结果 CNV-ETLAI 的准确性更胜一筹,CNV 提取成功率高达 98%,而 GPT-4 的成功率仅为 49%。具体来说,CNV-ETAI 在表格提取准确率(99% 对 41.2%)和上下文提取准确率(96% 对 63.2%)方面均优于 GPT-4。尽管 GPT-4 的性能较低,但其改进能力和适应性受到关注,这表明其未来在医疗数据提取方面具有潜在的适用性。结论 该研究强调了 CNV-ETLAI 目前在从医学文本中提取 CNV 方面的优势,尤其是在解释表格等结构化数据方面。不过,GPT-4 等 LLM 的适应性和发展潜力表明,它们很快就会成为医学数据提取的重要工具,为更广泛的应用提供更通用、更强大的解决方案。尽管 LLM 目前还存在局限性,但其前景广阔,这凸显了继续研究和开发用于基因组数据解读的人工智能技术的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Niacin and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: Deciphering the Paradox. Alzheimer Disease Blood-Based Biomarkers: Translation from Research into Clinical Use. Deconvolution of Human Urine across the Transcriptome and Metabolome. dmTGS: Precise Targeted Enrichment Long-Read Sequencing Panel for Tandem Repeat Detection. Estimating Reference Change Values Using Routine Patient Data: A Novel Pathology Database Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1