Indigenous Peoples' evaluation of health risks when facing mandatory evacuation for birth during the COVID-19 pandemic: an indigenous feminist analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11489-9
Melanie Murdock, Erika Campbell, Sarah Durant, Carol Couchie, Carmel Meekis, Charitie Rae, Julie Kenequanash, Arthi Erika Jeyamohan, Jacob Barry, Lisa Boivin, Karen Lawford
{"title":"Indigenous Peoples' evaluation of health risks when facing mandatory evacuation for birth during the COVID-19 pandemic: an indigenous feminist analysis.","authors":"Melanie Murdock, Erika Campbell, Sarah Durant, Carol Couchie, Carmel Meekis, Charitie Rae, Julie Kenequanash, Arthi Erika Jeyamohan, Jacob Barry, Lisa Boivin, Karen Lawford","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11489-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indigenous Peoples living on the land known as Canada are comprised of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis people and because of the Government of Canada's mandatory evacuation policy, those living in rural and remote regions of Ontario are required to travel to urban, tertiary care centres to give birth. When evaluating the risk of travelling for birth, Indigenous Peoples understand, evaluate, and conceptualise health risks differently than Eurocentric biomedical models of health. Also, the global COVID-19 pandemic changed how people perceived risks to their health. Our research goal was to better understand how Indigenous parturients living in rural and remote communities conceptualised the risks associated with evacuation for birth before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To achieve this goal, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 parturients who travelled for birth during the pandemic and with 5 family members of those who were evacuated for birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants conceptualised evacuation for birth as riskier during the COVID-19 pandemic and identified how the pandemic exacerbated existing risks of travelling for birth. In fact, Indigenous parturients noted the increased risk of contracting COVID-19 when travelling to urban centres for perinatal care, the impact of public health restrictions on increased isolation from family and community, the emotional impact of fear during the pandemic, and the decreased availability of quality healthcare.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using Indigenous Feminist Methodology and Indigenous Feminist Theory, we critically analysed how mandatory evacuation for birth functions as a colonial tool and how conceptualizations of risk empowered Indigenous Peoples to make decisions that reduced risks to their health during the pandemic. With the results of this study, policy makers and governments can better understand how Indigenous Peoples conceptualise risks related to evacuation for birth before and during the pandemic, and prioritise further consultation with Indigenous Peoples to collaborate in the delivery of the health and care they need and desire.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11489-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Indigenous Peoples living on the land known as Canada are comprised of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis people and because of the Government of Canada's mandatory evacuation policy, those living in rural and remote regions of Ontario are required to travel to urban, tertiary care centres to give birth. When evaluating the risk of travelling for birth, Indigenous Peoples understand, evaluate, and conceptualise health risks differently than Eurocentric biomedical models of health. Also, the global COVID-19 pandemic changed how people perceived risks to their health. Our research goal was to better understand how Indigenous parturients living in rural and remote communities conceptualised the risks associated with evacuation for birth before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: To achieve this goal, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 parturients who travelled for birth during the pandemic and with 5 family members of those who were evacuated for birth.

Results: Participants conceptualised evacuation for birth as riskier during the COVID-19 pandemic and identified how the pandemic exacerbated existing risks of travelling for birth. In fact, Indigenous parturients noted the increased risk of contracting COVID-19 when travelling to urban centres for perinatal care, the impact of public health restrictions on increased isolation from family and community, the emotional impact of fear during the pandemic, and the decreased availability of quality healthcare.

Conclusions: Using Indigenous Feminist Methodology and Indigenous Feminist Theory, we critically analysed how mandatory evacuation for birth functions as a colonial tool and how conceptualizations of risk empowered Indigenous Peoples to make decisions that reduced risks to their health during the pandemic. With the results of this study, policy makers and governments can better understand how Indigenous Peoples conceptualise risks related to evacuation for birth before and during the pandemic, and prioritise further consultation with Indigenous Peoples to collaborate in the delivery of the health and care they need and desire.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原住民在 COVID-19 大流行期间面临强制撤离生育时对健康风险的评估:原住民女性主义分析。
背景:生活在加拿大这片土地上的原住民由原住民、因纽特人和梅蒂斯人组成,由于加拿大政府的强制疏散政策,居住在安大略省农村和偏远地区的原住民必须前往城市的三级医疗中心分娩。在评估前往分娩的风险时,土著居民对健康风险的理解、评估和概念化与欧洲中心主义生物医学健康模式不同。此外,全球 COVID-19 大流行也改变了人们对健康风险的看法。我们的研究目标是更好地了解生活在农村和偏远社区的土著产妇在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间如何看待与疏散分娩相关的风险:为了实现这一目标,我们对 11 名在大流行期间前往分娩的产妇和 5 名因分娩而撤离的产妇的家人进行了半结构化访谈:结果:参与者认为在 COVID-19 大流行期间,因分娩而撤离的风险更大,并指出大流行如何加剧了因分娩而旅行的现有风险。事实上,原住民产妇指出,在前往城市中心接受围产期护理时,感染 COVID-19 的风险会增加;公共卫生限制会增加与家庭和社区的隔离;大流行期间的恐惧会对情绪产生影响;以及优质医疗服务的供应会减少:我们运用土著女性主义方法论和土著女性主义理论,批判性地分析了强制疏散分娩是如何作为一种殖民工具发挥作用的,以及风险概念化是如何赋予土著居民权力,使他们能够在大流行期间做出降低健康风险的决定的。有了这项研究的结果,政策制定者和政府就能更好地了解土著居民在大流行之前和期间是如何看待与分娩撤离有关的风险的,并优先考虑与土著居民进一步磋商,以合作提供他们需要和希望得到的健康和护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Employer support for health and social care registered professionals, their patients and service users involved in regulatory fitness to practise regulatory proceedings. Factors influencing the turnover intention for disease control and prevention workers in Northeast China: an empirical analysis based on logistic-ISM model. Qualitative drivers of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics use and resistance in Ethiopia. Supporting young people through the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a multi-site qualitative longitudinal study. The potential promise and pitfalls of point-of-care viral load monitoring to expedite HIV treatment decision-making in rural Uganda: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1