Cardiorespiratory Responses to Exercise in Hypobaric versus Normobaric Hypoxia: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Crossover Study.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000003578
Giovanni Vinetti, Rachel Turner, Anna Taboni, Simon Rauch, Paolo Mario Enrico Seraglio, Nikolaus Netzer, Giacomo Strapazzon, Hannes Gatterer
{"title":"Cardiorespiratory Responses to Exercise in Hypobaric versus Normobaric Hypoxia: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Crossover Study.","authors":"Giovanni Vinetti, Rachel Turner, Anna Taboni, Simon Rauch, Paolo Mario Enrico Seraglio, Nikolaus Netzer, Giacomo Strapazzon, Hannes Gatterer","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is controversy whether there are meaningful physiological differences between hypobaric (HH) and normobaric hypoxia (NH). This study aimed to compare the cardiorespiratory responses to acute HH and NH under strictly controlled conditions. We hypothesized no differences at rest and during submaximal exercise, whereas during maximal exercise, a higher maximal ventilation (V̇Emax), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) in HH than in NH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized, single-blind, crossover design, eight young healthy subjects (three females) were studied in an environmental chamber in which either the barometric pressure (HH) or the inspired oxygen fraction (NH) was reduced to the equivalent of ~4000 m altitude. Measurements were taken at rest, during submaximal (moderate and high intensity) and maximal cycling exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All resting parameters were similar between HH and NH, except for a lower root mean square of the successive R-R interval differences in HH (p < 0.05). SpO2 was 2% higher in HH at all exercise intensities (p < 0.05). During submaximal exercise, minute ventilation was similar between HH and NH. However, HH yielded a 7% lower tidal volume during moderate-intensity exercise (p < 0.05) and a lower respiratory exchange ratio during high-intensity exercise (p < 0.01). V̇Emax and V̇O2max were 11% and 6% higher in HH, respectively (p < 0.01 for both). SpO2 at maximal exercise was positively correlated with V̇Emax, V̇Emax/V̇O2max and V̇O2max.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The higher V̇O2max found in HH than in NH can be attributed to the higher V̇Emax counteracting desaturation at maximal exercise. Conversely, submaximal SpO2 improved in HH through mechanisms other than increased ventilation. These findings are likely due to respiratory muscle unloading in HH, which operated through different mechanisms depending on exercise intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003578","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is controversy whether there are meaningful physiological differences between hypobaric (HH) and normobaric hypoxia (NH). This study aimed to compare the cardiorespiratory responses to acute HH and NH under strictly controlled conditions. We hypothesized no differences at rest and during submaximal exercise, whereas during maximal exercise, a higher maximal ventilation (V̇Emax), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2max) in HH than in NH.

Methods: In a randomized, single-blind, crossover design, eight young healthy subjects (three females) were studied in an environmental chamber in which either the barometric pressure (HH) or the inspired oxygen fraction (NH) was reduced to the equivalent of ~4000 m altitude. Measurements were taken at rest, during submaximal (moderate and high intensity) and maximal cycling exercise.

Results: All resting parameters were similar between HH and NH, except for a lower root mean square of the successive R-R interval differences in HH (p < 0.05). SpO2 was 2% higher in HH at all exercise intensities (p < 0.05). During submaximal exercise, minute ventilation was similar between HH and NH. However, HH yielded a 7% lower tidal volume during moderate-intensity exercise (p < 0.05) and a lower respiratory exchange ratio during high-intensity exercise (p < 0.01). V̇Emax and V̇O2max were 11% and 6% higher in HH, respectively (p < 0.01 for both). SpO2 at maximal exercise was positively correlated with V̇Emax, V̇Emax/V̇O2max and V̇O2max.

Conclusions: The higher V̇O2max found in HH than in NH can be attributed to the higher V̇Emax counteracting desaturation at maximal exercise. Conversely, submaximal SpO2 improved in HH through mechanisms other than increased ventilation. These findings are likely due to respiratory muscle unloading in HH, which operated through different mechanisms depending on exercise intensity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低压氧与常压氧下运动的心肺反应:一项随机、单盲、交叉研究。
目的:对于低压缺氧(HH)和常压缺氧(NH)之间是否存在有意义的生理差异存在争议。本研究旨在比较在严格控制条件下急性 HH 和 NH 的心肺反应。我们假设在静息和亚极限运动时没有差异,而在极限运动时,HH 的最大通气量(V鄄Emax)、外周血氧饱和度(SpO2)和最大耗氧量(V鄄O2max)均高于 NH:采用随机、单盲、交叉设计,在气压(HH)或吸入氧分数(NH)降低到相当于海拔约 4000 米的环境舱中对 8 名年轻健康受试者(3 名女性)进行研究。研究人员在静息状态下、在次最大强度(中等强度和高强度)和最大强度的骑车运动中进行了测量:除了 HH 的连续 R-R 间期差异的均方根较低(P < 0.05)外,HH 和 NH 的所有静息参数都相似。在所有运动强度下,HH 的 SpO2 均比 NH 高 2%(P < 0.05)。在亚极限运动中,HH 和 NH 的分钟通气量相似。然而,在中等强度运动中,HH 的潮气量比 NH 低 7%(p < 0.05),在高强度运动中,HH 的呼吸交换比比 NH 低(p < 0.01)。HH患者的最大呼吸容积和最大氧容积分别高出11%和6%(两者的P < 0.01)。最大运动量时的 SpO2 与最大运动量、最大运动量/最大运动量和最大运动量呈正相关:与NH相比,HH的最大血氧饱和度较高,这是因为在最大运动量时,较高的最大血氧饱和度抵消了脱饱和度。相反,通过通气量增加以外的机制,HH 的亚最大 SpO2 有所改善。这些发现可能是由于 HH 的呼吸肌卸载所致,根据运动强度的不同,卸载的机制也不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
期刊最新文献
Cardiorespiratory Responses to Exercise in Hypobaric versus Normobaric Hypoxia: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Crossover Study. Acute Vigorous Exercise Decreases Subsequent Nonexercise Physical Activity and Body Temperature Linked to Weight Gain. Repeated Sprint Training in Hypoxia Improves Repeated Sprint Ability to Exhaustion Similarly in Active Males and Females. Respiratory and Metabolic Responses of CD4 + T Cells to Acute Exercise and Their Association with Cardiorespiratory Fitness. Self-Supervised Machine Learning to Characterize Step Counts from Wrist-Worn Accelerometers in the UK Biobank.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1