Johanna Luitjens, Katharina Ziegeler, Daehyun Yoon, Felix Gassert, Rupsa Bhattacharjee, Rawee Manatrakul, Chotigar Ngarmsrikam, Amy Becker, Yang Yang, Gabby B Joseph, Pan Su, Pedro Itriago-Leon, Sharmila Majumdar, Thomas M Link
{"title":"Improved metal suppression using new generation low-field MRI: a biophantom feasibility study.","authors":"Johanna Luitjens, Katharina Ziegeler, Daehyun Yoon, Felix Gassert, Rupsa Bhattacharjee, Rawee Manatrakul, Chotigar Ngarmsrikam, Amy Becker, Yang Yang, Gabby B Joseph, Pan Su, Pedro Itriago-Leon, Sharmila Majumdar, Thomas M Link","doi":"10.1007/s00256-024-04809-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Novel 0.55 MRI scanners have the potential to reduce metal artifacts around orthopedic implants. The purpose of this study was to compare metal artifact size and depiction of anatomy between 0.55 T and 3.0 T MRI in a biophantom.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Steel and titanium screws were implanted in 12 porcine knee specimens and imaging at 0.55 T and 3 T MRI was performed using the following sequences: turbo spin-echo (TSE), TSE with view angle tilting (VAT), and slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) with proton-density (PD) and T2-weighted short-tau inversion-recovery (T2w-STIR) contrasts. Artifacts were measured, and visualization of anatomy (cartilage, bone, growth plates, cruciate ligaments) was assessed and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Metal artifacts were significantly smaller at 0.55 T. The smallest artifact sizes were achieved with SEMAC at 0.55 T for both PD and T2w-STIR sequences; corresponding relative size reductions vs. 3.0 T were 78.7% and 79.4% (stainless steel) and 45.3% and 1.4% (titanium). Depiction of anatomical structures was superior at 0.55 T.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial reduction of artifact size resulting in superior depiction of anatomical structures is possible on novel 0.55 T MRI systems. Further clinical studies are required to elucidate patient-relevant advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04809-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Novel 0.55 MRI scanners have the potential to reduce metal artifacts around orthopedic implants. The purpose of this study was to compare metal artifact size and depiction of anatomy between 0.55 T and 3.0 T MRI in a biophantom.
Materials and methods: Steel and titanium screws were implanted in 12 porcine knee specimens and imaging at 0.55 T and 3 T MRI was performed using the following sequences: turbo spin-echo (TSE), TSE with view angle tilting (VAT), and slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) with proton-density (PD) and T2-weighted short-tau inversion-recovery (T2w-STIR) contrasts. Artifacts were measured, and visualization of anatomy (cartilage, bone, growth plates, cruciate ligaments) was assessed and compared between groups.
Results: Metal artifacts were significantly smaller at 0.55 T. The smallest artifact sizes were achieved with SEMAC at 0.55 T for both PD and T2w-STIR sequences; corresponding relative size reductions vs. 3.0 T were 78.7% and 79.4% (stainless steel) and 45.3% and 1.4% (titanium). Depiction of anatomical structures was superior at 0.55 T.
Conclusion: Substantial reduction of artifact size resulting in superior depiction of anatomical structures is possible on novel 0.55 T MRI systems. Further clinical studies are required to elucidate patient-relevant advantages.
期刊介绍:
Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration.
This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.