Long-Term Weight Loss and Comorbidity Resolution of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and the Impact of Preoperative Weight Loss on Overall Outcome.

James Lucocq, Kate Homyer, Georgios Geropoulos, Vikram Thakur, Daniel Stansfield, Brian Joyce, Gillian Drummond, Bruce Tulloh, Andrew de Beaux, Peter J Lamb, Andrew G Robertson
{"title":"Long-Term Weight Loss and Comorbidity Resolution of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and the Impact of Preoperative Weight Loss on Overall Outcome.","authors":"James Lucocq, Kate Homyer, Georgios Geropoulos, Vikram Thakur, Daniel Stansfield, Brian Joyce, Gillian Drummond, Bruce Tulloh, Andrew de Beaux, Peter J Lamb, Andrew G Robertson","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of preoperative weight loss on long-term weight loss outcomes and comorbidity resolution in both laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are poorly reported. Understanding this relationship is necessary to guide surgeons toward appropriate procedure and patient selection. The present study investigates long-term weight loss outcomes and comorbidity resolution following LSG and LRYGB and investigates the effect of preoperative variables on long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent LSG and LRYGB (2008-2022) in a tertiary referral centre were followed up prospectively. From 2010, a 12-week intensive preoperative information course (IPIC) became standard practice to optimize preoperative weight loss. Excess weight loss outcomes (EWL≥50% and ≥70%) were compared between LSG and LRYGB using multivariate logistic regression and the effect of preoperative weight loss on weight loss and comorbidity resolution, improvement, and exacerbation were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 319 patients (median age: 49 y; M:F, 75:244) were included (158 LSG: 161 LRYGB). During follow-up, 260 (81.5%) and 163 patients (51.1%) achieved EWL≥50% and ≥70%, respectively. Those with sustained EWL≥50% and EWL≥70% at the end of follow-up were more likely to have underwent a LRYGB versus a LSG (59.6% vs. 40.4%, P=0.002; 61.7% vs. 38.3%, P<0.001). IPIC and higher preoperative weight loss (HR: 2.59 to 3.72, P<0.001) increased rates of EWL≥50% and EWL70% for both procedures. Improvement or resolution of type-2 diabetes were significant (72.7%), but up to 27.3% of patients developed or suffered an exacerbation of a psychiatric illness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Excess weight loss outcomes are similar for LSG and LRYGB but LRYGB results in higher rates of sustained excess weight loss during long-term follow-up. Preoperative weight loss improves long-term weight loss. Comorbidity resolution is significant but rates of psychiatric illness exacerbation are high following metabolic and bariatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":"34 5","pages":"466-471"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of preoperative weight loss on long-term weight loss outcomes and comorbidity resolution in both laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are poorly reported. Understanding this relationship is necessary to guide surgeons toward appropriate procedure and patient selection. The present study investigates long-term weight loss outcomes and comorbidity resolution following LSG and LRYGB and investigates the effect of preoperative variables on long-term outcomes.

Methods: All patients who underwent LSG and LRYGB (2008-2022) in a tertiary referral centre were followed up prospectively. From 2010, a 12-week intensive preoperative information course (IPIC) became standard practice to optimize preoperative weight loss. Excess weight loss outcomes (EWL≥50% and ≥70%) were compared between LSG and LRYGB using multivariate logistic regression and the effect of preoperative weight loss on weight loss and comorbidity resolution, improvement, and exacerbation were reported.

Results: A total of 319 patients (median age: 49 y; M:F, 75:244) were included (158 LSG: 161 LRYGB). During follow-up, 260 (81.5%) and 163 patients (51.1%) achieved EWL≥50% and ≥70%, respectively. Those with sustained EWL≥50% and EWL≥70% at the end of follow-up were more likely to have underwent a LRYGB versus a LSG (59.6% vs. 40.4%, P=0.002; 61.7% vs. 38.3%, P<0.001). IPIC and higher preoperative weight loss (HR: 2.59 to 3.72, P<0.001) increased rates of EWL≥50% and EWL70% for both procedures. Improvement or resolution of type-2 diabetes were significant (72.7%), but up to 27.3% of patients developed or suffered an exacerbation of a psychiatric illness.

Conclusions: Excess weight loss outcomes are similar for LSG and LRYGB but LRYGB results in higher rates of sustained excess weight loss during long-term follow-up. Preoperative weight loss improves long-term weight loss. Comorbidity resolution is significant but rates of psychiatric illness exacerbation are high following metabolic and bariatric surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜袖带胃切除术和腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的长期体重减轻和合并症解决情况以及术前体重减轻对总体结果的影响。
背景:在腹腔镜袖带胃切除术(LSG)和腹腔镜鲁氏胃旁路术(LRYGB)中,术前体重减轻对长期减肥效果和合并症缓解的影响鲜有报道。了解这种关系对于指导外科医生选择合适的手术和患者非常必要。本研究调查了 LSG 和 LRYGB 术后的长期减肥效果和合并症缓解情况,并调查了术前变量对长期效果的影响:方法:对一家三级转诊中心接受 LSG 和 LRYGB 手术的所有患者(2008-2022 年)进行了前瞻性随访。自2010年起,为期12周的术前信息强化课程(IPIC)成为优化术前减重的标准做法。使用多变量逻辑回归比较了 LSG 和 LRYGB 的超重结果(EWL≥50% 和≥70%),并报告了术前减重对体重减轻和合并症缓解、改善和加重的影响:共纳入 319 名患者(中位年龄:49 岁;男女比例:75:244)(158 名 LSG 患者:161 名 LRYGB 患者)。随访期间,分别有 260 名患者(81.5%)和 163 名患者(51.1%)达到 EWL≥50% 和 ≥70%。随访结束时EWL≥50%和EWL≥70%的患者更有可能接受了LRYGB而不是LSG(59.6%对40.4%,P=0.002;61.7%对38.3%,PC结论:LSG和LRYGB的超重减肥效果相似,但LRYGB在长期随访中的持续超重减肥率更高。术前减重可改善长期减重效果。合并症明显减轻,但代谢和减肥手术后精神疾病加重率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
期刊最新文献
How I Do It: Simplified Transcystic Antegrade-only Robotic Common Bile Duct Exploration (RCBDE). Single-dock Robotic Bilateral Transversus Abdominis Release: Technique Description and Preliminary Outcomes. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score-matched Study. Rectal Eversion as an Anus-sparing Technique in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection With Double Stapling Anastomosis: Long-term Functional Results. Single-port Thoracoscopic Laser Sympathicotomy for Primary Hyperhidrosis: A Safe and Minimally Invasive Approach With Favorable Short-term Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1