Knowledge and perceptions of health literacy among pharmacists in Ohio in 2013 and 2021

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2024.102260
Karissa Kim, Anne M. Metzger, Megan Than Win, Madison Luck, Marwan Alrasheed
{"title":"Knowledge and perceptions of health literacy among pharmacists in Ohio in 2013 and 2021","authors":"Karissa Kim,&nbsp;Anne M. Metzger,&nbsp;Megan Than Win,&nbsp;Madison Luck,&nbsp;Marwan Alrasheed","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is limited existing literature on pharmacists' knowledge of health literacy and the interventions pharmacists use to address limited health literacy.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate pharmacists' knowledge and perceptions of the impact of limited health literacy on patients and their practice, and to review the techniques used to care for patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey of registered Ohio pharmacists in 2013 and repeated the survey in 2021. The Nursing Professional Health Literacy Survey was adapted and employed to assess 1) general knowledge; 2) health literacy in the workplace; and 3) demographics. Changes in pharmacists' knowledge and perceptions of health literacy, self-reported use of communication techniques, and methods for assessing a patient’s health literacy were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Response rates were 12.4% (N = 62) in 2013 and 3.5% (N = 174) in 2021. Awareness of the term health literacy increased, rising from 82.3% to 89.7% (<em>P</em> = 0.127). Less than 41% of pharmacists in both cohorts had received formal health literacy training; a regression model indicated that pharmacists with more years of practice were less likely to have had such training (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Most pharmacists admitted they never formally assess health literacy (79.0% in 2013 and 81.6% in 2021; <em>P</em> = 0.875) but reported often relying on their gut feeling to gauge a patient's health literacy (37.1% in 2013 and 41.4% in 2021; <em>P</em> = 0.658). The percentage of pharmacists who orally reviewed written instructions with patients, used layman’s terms, and had patients demonstrate instructions significantly increased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) between 2013 and 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Gaps remain in pharmacists' knowledge and practices related to health literacy. From 2013 to 2021, there were improvements in how pharmacists communicate with patients who have limited health literacy, but no significant change in the methods used to assess health literacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":"65 1","pages":"Article 102260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124002917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is limited existing literature on pharmacists' knowledge of health literacy and the interventions pharmacists use to address limited health literacy.

Objectives

The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate pharmacists' knowledge and perceptions of the impact of limited health literacy on patients and their practice, and to review the techniques used to care for patients.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey of registered Ohio pharmacists in 2013 and repeated the survey in 2021. The Nursing Professional Health Literacy Survey was adapted and employed to assess 1) general knowledge; 2) health literacy in the workplace; and 3) demographics. Changes in pharmacists' knowledge and perceptions of health literacy, self-reported use of communication techniques, and methods for assessing a patient’s health literacy were evaluated.

Results

Response rates were 12.4% (N = 62) in 2013 and 3.5% (N = 174) in 2021. Awareness of the term health literacy increased, rising from 82.3% to 89.7% (P = 0.127). Less than 41% of pharmacists in both cohorts had received formal health literacy training; a regression model indicated that pharmacists with more years of practice were less likely to have had such training (P < 0.05). Most pharmacists admitted they never formally assess health literacy (79.0% in 2013 and 81.6% in 2021; P = 0.875) but reported often relying on their gut feeling to gauge a patient's health literacy (37.1% in 2013 and 41.4% in 2021; P = 0.658). The percentage of pharmacists who orally reviewed written instructions with patients, used layman’s terms, and had patients demonstrate instructions significantly increased (P < 0.05) between 2013 and 2021.

Conclusion

Gaps remain in pharmacists' knowledge and practices related to health literacy. From 2013 to 2021, there were improvements in how pharmacists communicate with patients who have limited health literacy, but no significant change in the methods used to assess health literacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2013 年和 2021 年俄亥俄州药剂师对健康知识的了解和看法。
背景:关于药剂师的健康素养知识以及药剂师针对有限的健康素养所采取的干预措施的现有文献有限:关于药剂师的健康素养知识以及药剂师为解决健康素养有限问题而采取的干预措施的现有文献十分有限:本研究的主要目的是评估药剂师对有限健康素养对患者及其实践的影响的了解和看法,并审查用于护理患者的技术:我们于 2013 年对俄亥俄州的注册药剂师进行了一次横断面网络调查,并于 2021 年再次进行了调查。我们对护理专业人员健康素养调查进行了改编,并采用该调查来评估 1) 一般知识;2) 工作场所的健康素养;3) 人口统计学。此外,还评估了药剂师对健康素养知识和看法的变化、自我报告的沟通技巧使用情况以及评估患者健康素养的方法:2013 年的回复率为 12.4%(62 人),2021 年为 3.5%(174 人)。对健康素养一词的认识有所提高,从 82.3% 上升至 89.7%(P=0.127)。两个组群中只有不到 41% 的药剂师接受过正规的健康素养培训;回归模型显示,从业年限越长的药剂师接受过此类培训的可能性越小(P 结论:药剂师在健康素养方面的知识仍然存在差距:药剂师在健康素养相关知识和实践方面仍存在差距。从 2013 年到 2021 年,药剂师与健康素养有限的患者沟通的方式有所改善,但用于评估健康素养的方法没有显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Implementing a Telemedicine-led Heart Failure Medication Regimen Optimization Clinic in Medically Underserved Heart Failure Populations. Exploring the pharmacist role in insomnia management and care provision: A scoping review. Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Older Adults: Incidence and Risk Factors Related to Patient Characteristics and Initial Opioid Dispensed. Pharmacists Enhance National Security through Medical Countermeasure Program Leadership. Barriers to and Facilitators of Buprenorphine Dispensing for Opioid Use Disorder: Evidence from Focus Groups in Appalachian Kentucky.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1