{"title":"Frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 75,357 patients","authors":"Fei Zhang , Ying Yan , Chunlin Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.arr.2024.102528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Frailty is the most problematic expression of population ageing, which has been associated with increased mortality and complications among patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, previous evidence about the frailty prevalence and outcomes in frail populations with gastric cancer remains unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eligible studies were searched in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to explore the prevalence and impact of frailty in patients with gastric cancer from inception until November 25, 2023. The pooled prevalence of frailty, hazard ratio (HR), and odds ratio (OR) corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI) in mortality and postoperative complications estimates were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 24 studies containing 75,357 GC patients were involved. The prevalence of frailty in gastric cancer was 27 % (95 % CI = 24–30; I<sup>2</sup> = 96.7 %; <em>p</em> = 0.000). Frailty was independently associated with an increased hazard ratio for mortality (adjusted HR = 2.14; 95 % CI = 1.60–2.86; I<sup>2</sup> = 67.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.000). Furthermore, frailty was significantly associated with an increased odds ratio for postoperative complication in GC patients (adjusted OR = 2.65; 95 % CI = 2.17–3.25; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0 %, Cochran’s Q = 1.20, <em>p</em> = 0.878).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The prevalence of frailty in gastric cancer is common and has a significant adverse effect on GC patients’ outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of routine frailty assessment in GC patients, which may provide prognostic outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55545,"journal":{"name":"Ageing Research Reviews","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102528"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163724003465","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Frailty is the most problematic expression of population ageing, which has been associated with increased mortality and complications among patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, previous evidence about the frailty prevalence and outcomes in frail populations with gastric cancer remains unknown.
Methods
Eligible studies were searched in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to explore the prevalence and impact of frailty in patients with gastric cancer from inception until November 25, 2023. The pooled prevalence of frailty, hazard ratio (HR), and odds ratio (OR) corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI) in mortality and postoperative complications estimates were analyzed.
Results
A total of 24 studies containing 75,357 GC patients were involved. The prevalence of frailty in gastric cancer was 27 % (95 % CI = 24–30; I2 = 96.7 %; p = 0.000). Frailty was independently associated with an increased hazard ratio for mortality (adjusted HR = 2.14; 95 % CI = 1.60–2.86; I2 = 67.3 %, p = 0.000). Furthermore, frailty was significantly associated with an increased odds ratio for postoperative complication in GC patients (adjusted OR = 2.65; 95 % CI = 2.17–3.25; I2 = 0.0 %, Cochran’s Q = 1.20, p = 0.878).
Conclusion
The prevalence of frailty in gastric cancer is common and has a significant adverse effect on GC patients’ outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of routine frailty assessment in GC patients, which may provide prognostic outcomes.
期刊介绍:
With the rise in average human life expectancy, the impact of ageing and age-related diseases on our society has become increasingly significant. Ageing research is now a focal point for numerous laboratories, encompassing leaders in genetics, molecular and cellular biology, biochemistry, and behavior. Ageing Research Reviews (ARR) serves as a cornerstone in this field, addressing emerging trends.
ARR aims to fill a substantial gap by providing critical reviews and viewpoints on evolving discoveries concerning the mechanisms of ageing and age-related diseases. The rapid progress in understanding the mechanisms controlling cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival is unveiling new insights into the regulation of ageing. From telomerase to stem cells, and from energy to oxyradical metabolism, we are witnessing an exciting era in the multidisciplinary field of ageing research.
The journal explores the cellular and molecular foundations of interventions that extend lifespan, such as caloric restriction. It identifies the underpinnings of manipulations that extend lifespan, shedding light on novel approaches for preventing age-related diseases. ARR publishes articles on focused topics selected from the expansive field of ageing research, with a particular emphasis on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the aging process. This includes age-related diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and neurodegenerative disorders. The journal also covers applications of basic ageing research to lifespan extension and disease prevention, offering a comprehensive platform for advancing our understanding of this critical field.