Does major make a difference? Mental health literacy and its relation to college major in a diverse sample of undergraduate students.

Rona T Miles, Anjali Krishnan, Laura A Rabin, Stephan A Brandt, Maisa Lopes Crispino
{"title":"Does major make a difference? Mental health literacy and its relation to college major in a diverse sample of undergraduate students.","authors":"Rona T Miles, Anjali Krishnan, Laura A Rabin, Stephan A Brandt, Maisa Lopes Crispino","doi":"10.1007/s44192-024-00099-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Examining a large number of specific college majors and their association with mental health literacy (MHL) is an important step towards identifying at-risk groups at the college level. Though prior research has investigated MHL across student demographics such as gender, age, ethnicity, and level of education, the present study was the first to compare the MHL of undergraduate students across 19 different college majors. A total of 617 demographically and ethnically diverse undergraduate students (62.1% female; 69.3% non-white; mean age = 22.2 years; mean year in college = 2.8) reported their demographics, college experience, and college major, and completed an MHL measure that assessed knowledge of more than 20 psychological disorders and the application of that knowledge to real life scenarios. After controlling for gender, data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc comparisons to determine if differences in mental health literacy level were related to specific college majors. Results revealed that mental health literacy significantly differed across majors, F(18, 598) = 5.09, p < .001. Specifically, students majoring in accounting, nursing, business, biology, and those in a multidisciplinary category had significantly lower mental health literacy scores compared to the highest scoring major, psychology. We present empirical data about variations in mental health literacy across many different majors in higher education. Our findings provide a rationale for interventions for academic majors with lower MHL, as well as a rationale for training of college faculty and staff, for the purpose of improving psychological well-being in at-risk college students.</p>","PeriodicalId":72827,"journal":{"name":"Discover mental health","volume":"4 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-024-00099-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examining a large number of specific college majors and their association with mental health literacy (MHL) is an important step towards identifying at-risk groups at the college level. Though prior research has investigated MHL across student demographics such as gender, age, ethnicity, and level of education, the present study was the first to compare the MHL of undergraduate students across 19 different college majors. A total of 617 demographically and ethnically diverse undergraduate students (62.1% female; 69.3% non-white; mean age = 22.2 years; mean year in college = 2.8) reported their demographics, college experience, and college major, and completed an MHL measure that assessed knowledge of more than 20 psychological disorders and the application of that knowledge to real life scenarios. After controlling for gender, data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc comparisons to determine if differences in mental health literacy level were related to specific college majors. Results revealed that mental health literacy significantly differed across majors, F(18, 598) = 5.09, p < .001. Specifically, students majoring in accounting, nursing, business, biology, and those in a multidisciplinary category had significantly lower mental health literacy scores compared to the highest scoring major, psychology. We present empirical data about variations in mental health literacy across many different majors in higher education. Our findings provide a rationale for interventions for academic majors with lower MHL, as well as a rationale for training of college faculty and staff, for the purpose of improving psychological well-being in at-risk college students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业有区别吗?不同本科生样本中的心理健康素养及其与大学专业的关系。
研究大量特定的大学专业及其与心理健康素养(MHL)的关系,是在大学层面识别高危群体的重要一步。虽然之前的研究已经调查了不同性别、年龄、种族和教育水平等学生人口统计学方面的心理健康素养,但本研究是首次比较 19 个不同大学专业的本科生的心理健康素养。共有617名不同人口统计学和种族的本科生(62.1%为女性;69.3%为非白人;平均年龄=22.2岁;平均大学年限=2.8年)报告了他们的人口统计学、大学经历和大学专业,并完成了一项MHL测量,该测量评估了20多种心理障碍的知识以及这些知识在现实生活场景中的应用。在对性别进行控制后,使用方差分析和事后比较对数据进行分析,以确定心理健康素养水平的差异是否与特定的大学专业有关。结果显示,心理健康素养在不同专业之间存在显著差异,F(18, 598) = 5.09, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Distribution and association of road traffic accident with depression among Indian population aged 45 years and above: nested multilevel modelling analysis of nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Unveiling the burden: prevalence and predictors of psychological distress among domestic workers in Kigali-Rwanda. Patterns and outcomes of individuals admitted at emergency units following intentional self-harm in Northern Uganda. Prevalence of substance use among a sample of patients attending an outpatient psychiatric clinic in Amman, Jordan. The role of emotion regulation strategies as the mediator between self-compassion and depression among undergraduates in Yunnan province, China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1