Assessing older adult physical activity levels in clinical settings: The modified PAVS for older adults.

Mark Stoutenberg, Michael Rogers, Paige Denison, Jeff Schlicht, Kelsey Weitzel, Marcia Ory, Garrett Kellar, Louisa Summers, Mariana Wingood
{"title":"Assessing older adult physical activity levels in clinical settings: The modified PAVS for older adults.","authors":"Mark Stoutenberg, Michael Rogers, Paige Denison, Jeff Schlicht, Kelsey Weitzel, Marcia Ory, Garrett Kellar, Louisa Summers, Mariana Wingood","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Participating in recommended levels of physical activity (PA) is critical for preventing functional decline, falls, and frailty, making it essential to identify older adults not meeting national PA guidelines. However, guidance on assessing older adult PA levels, particularly in clinical settings, is lacking. This article presents an overview of clinically feasible PA assessment tools for older adults, identifies gaps in current tools, and provides recommendations on addressing these gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature review on clinically feasible PA assessment tools, suggested modifications to an existing PA assessment for older adult patients, and highlighted opportunities for integrating the modified PA assessment tool in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 16 PA assessment tools used in clinical settings. The most widely used tool is the Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS), which has been successfully integrated into several electronic health records (EHR) and clinical practices. Most tools, including the PAVS, primarily focus on aerobic activities, with limited consideration for strength and balance. We recommend the use of a Modified PAVS for Older Adults that includes items on muscle-strengthening and balance activities to better align with national PA guidelines. We then identified several existing opportunities for broad implementation of the Modified PAVS for Older Adults within clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Widespread integration of the Modified PAVS for Older Adults will better support healthcare providers in identifying individuals not meeting national PA recommendations, assisting them in prescribing tailored PA prescriptions and better connecting their patients to appropriate resources and professionals for further support.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Participating in recommended levels of physical activity (PA) is critical for preventing functional decline, falls, and frailty, making it essential to identify older adults not meeting national PA guidelines. However, guidance on assessing older adult PA levels, particularly in clinical settings, is lacking. This article presents an overview of clinically feasible PA assessment tools for older adults, identifies gaps in current tools, and provides recommendations on addressing these gaps.

Methods: We conducted a literature review on clinically feasible PA assessment tools, suggested modifications to an existing PA assessment for older adult patients, and highlighted opportunities for integrating the modified PA assessment tool in clinical settings.

Results: We identified 16 PA assessment tools used in clinical settings. The most widely used tool is the Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS), which has been successfully integrated into several electronic health records (EHR) and clinical practices. Most tools, including the PAVS, primarily focus on aerobic activities, with limited consideration for strength and balance. We recommend the use of a Modified PAVS for Older Adults that includes items on muscle-strengthening and balance activities to better align with national PA guidelines. We then identified several existing opportunities for broad implementation of the Modified PAVS for Older Adults within clinical settings.

Conclusions: Widespread integration of the Modified PAVS for Older Adults will better support healthcare providers in identifying individuals not meeting national PA recommendations, assisting them in prescribing tailored PA prescriptions and better connecting their patients to appropriate resources and professionals for further support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在临床环境中评估老年人的体育活动水平:针对老年人的改良版 PAVS。
背景:参加推荐水平的体育锻炼(PA)对于预防功能衰退、跌倒和虚弱至关重要,因此,识别未达到国家体育锻炼指南要求的老年人至关重要。然而,目前还缺乏评估老年人体育锻炼水平的指导,尤其是在临床环境中。本文概述了临床上可行的老年人体力活动评估工具,指出了当前工具中存在的不足,并就如何弥补这些不足提出了建议:方法:我们对临床上可行的 PA 评估工具进行了文献综述,对现有的针对老年患者的 PA 评估工具提出了修改建议,并强调了将修改后的 PA 评估工具整合到临床环境中的机会:结果:我们发现了 16 种在临床环境中使用的 PA 评估工具。使用最广泛的工具是体力活动生命体征 (PAVS),该工具已成功整合到多个电子健康记录 (EHR) 和临床实践中。包括 PAVS 在内的大多数工具主要侧重于有氧活动,对力量和平衡的考虑有限。我们建议使用 "改良版老年人有氧体力活动调查表",其中包括肌肉强化和平衡活动项目,以便更好地与国家有氧体力活动指南保持一致。然后,我们确定了在临床环境中广泛实施 "改良版老年人肌肉力量和平衡测试 "的几个现有机会:结论:广泛整合 "改良版老年人户外活动能力评估表 "将更好地帮助医疗服务提供者识别不符合国家户外活动建议的个人,协助他们开具量身定制的户外活动处方,并更好地将患者与适当的资源和专业人士联系起来,以提供进一步的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
The art of aging gracefully. Factors associated with language concordant cognitive testing among linguistically diverse older adults. Denosumab for osteoporosis in older adults in long-term care: A randomized trial. Change in frailty among older COVID-19 survivors. Stress tests and biomarkers of resilience: Proceedings of the second state of resilience science conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1