Brain endurance training improves sedentary older adults’ cognitive and physical performance when fresh and fatigued

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Psychology of Sport and Exercise Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102757
Jesús Díaz-García , Tomás García-Calvo , Christopher Ring
{"title":"Brain endurance training improves sedentary older adults’ cognitive and physical performance when fresh and fatigued","authors":"Jesús Díaz-García ,&nbsp;Tomás García-Calvo ,&nbsp;Christopher Ring","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Cognitive and physical performance is impaired by aging and fatigue. Cognitive and exercise training may mitigate such impairments. Accordingly, we investigated the effect of Brain Endurance Training (BET) – combined cognitive and exercise training – on cognitive and physical performance when fresh and fatigued in older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Twenty-four healthy sedentary women (65–78 years) were randomly allocated to one of three training groups: BET, exercise training, and control (no training). The BET and exercise training groups completed the same physical training protocol comprising three 45-min exercise sessions (20-min resistance exercise plus 25-min endurance exercise) per week for eight weeks. The BET group completed a 20-min cognitive task prior to exercise tasks. Cognitive (tasks: psychomotor vigilance, Stroop) and physical (tests: walk, chair-stand, arm curl) performance was tested when fresh and fatigued (before and after a 30-min cognitive task) at weeks 0 (pre-test), 4 (mid-test), 8 (post-test), and 12 (follow-up test).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cognitive and physical and performance was generally superior when fresh and fatigued at mid-test and post-test for both BET and exercise training groups compared to the control group. The BET group outperformed the exercise group when fatigued at mid-test and post-test both cognitively (always) and physically (sometimes). The pre-to-post changes in cognitive performance when fresh and fatigued averaged 3.7 % and 7.8 % for BET, 3.6 % and 4.5 % for exercise, and −0.4 % and 0.3 % for control groups. The corresponding changes in physical performance averaged 16.5 % and 29.9 % for BET, 13.8 % and 22.4 % for exercise, and 10.8 % and 7.1 % for control groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings show that BET can improve cognitive and physical performance in older adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54536,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102757"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029224001687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Cognitive and physical performance is impaired by aging and fatigue. Cognitive and exercise training may mitigate such impairments. Accordingly, we investigated the effect of Brain Endurance Training (BET) – combined cognitive and exercise training – on cognitive and physical performance when fresh and fatigued in older adults.

Design

Twenty-four healthy sedentary women (65–78 years) were randomly allocated to one of three training groups: BET, exercise training, and control (no training). The BET and exercise training groups completed the same physical training protocol comprising three 45-min exercise sessions (20-min resistance exercise plus 25-min endurance exercise) per week for eight weeks. The BET group completed a 20-min cognitive task prior to exercise tasks. Cognitive (tasks: psychomotor vigilance, Stroop) and physical (tests: walk, chair-stand, arm curl) performance was tested when fresh and fatigued (before and after a 30-min cognitive task) at weeks 0 (pre-test), 4 (mid-test), 8 (post-test), and 12 (follow-up test).

Results

Cognitive and physical and performance was generally superior when fresh and fatigued at mid-test and post-test for both BET and exercise training groups compared to the control group. The BET group outperformed the exercise group when fatigued at mid-test and post-test both cognitively (always) and physically (sometimes). The pre-to-post changes in cognitive performance when fresh and fatigued averaged 3.7 % and 7.8 % for BET, 3.6 % and 4.5 % for exercise, and −0.4 % and 0.3 % for control groups. The corresponding changes in physical performance averaged 16.5 % and 29.9 % for BET, 13.8 % and 22.4 % for exercise, and 10.8 % and 7.1 % for control groups.

Conclusion

These findings show that BET can improve cognitive and physical performance in older adults.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑耐力训练可提高久坐不动的老年人在新鲜和疲劳状态下的认知和体能表现。
目标:认知和体能表现会因衰老和疲劳而受损。认知和运动训练可减轻这种损害。因此,我们研究了脑耐力训练(Brain Endurance Training,BET)--认知和运动相结合的训练--对老年人在新鲜和疲劳状态下的认知和体能表现的影响:设计:24 名健康的久坐妇女(65-78 岁)被随机分配到三个训练组中的一组:BET 组、运动训练组和对照组(无训练)。BET 组和运动训练组完成相同的体能训练方案,包括每周三次、每次 45 分钟的运动(20 分钟阻力运动加 25 分钟耐力运动),为期八周。BET 组在完成运动任务前完成 20 分钟的认知任务。在第 0 周(前测)、第 4 周(中测)、第 8 周(后测)和第 12 周(随访测试),分别测试了认知(任务:精神运动警觉性、Stroop)和体能(测试:步行、椅子站立、卷臂)在新鲜和疲劳状态下(30 分钟认知任务之前和之后)的表现:与对照组相比,在测试中期和测试后,BET 组和运动训练组在新鲜和疲劳状态下的认知和体能表现均优于对照组。BET 组在测试中期和测试后疲劳时的认知(总是)和体能(有时)表现均优于运动组。在新鲜和疲劳状态下,BET 组的认知能力在测试前和测试后的平均变化率分别为 3.7% 和 7.8%,运动组分别为 3.6% 和 4.5%,而对照组分别为-0.4% 和 0.3%。相应的身体表现变化,BET 组平均为 16.5%和 29.9%,运动组平均为 13.8%和 22.4%,对照组平均为 10.8%和 7.1%:这些研究结果表明,BET 可以改善老年人的认知能力和体能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
172
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.
期刊最新文献
Avoiding repetitive mistakes: Understanding post-error adjustment in response to head fake actions Within-person associations between daily stress and physical activity during working and non-working hours Behind the mask: Attentional focus and coping strategies of elite level fencers Expertise advantage of automatic prediction in visual motion representation is domain-general: A meta-analysis Do gender stereotype threats have a spillover effect on motor tasks among children? A mixed-model design investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1