Mistakes in Thinking about Cognitive Science and How to Reduce Them.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES eNeuro Pub Date : 2024-10-04 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0380-24.2024
P N Johnson-Laird
{"title":"Mistakes in Thinking about Cognitive Science and How to Reduce Them.","authors":"P N Johnson-Laird","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0380-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article allows readers to assess their ability to detect errors in thinking in seven case histories of psychologists' thoughts about cognitive science. It explains the nature of the errors and shows that some of them reflect faulty reasoning. It presents a \"model method\" to improve reasoning. It is based on the theory of mental models, which gives a general account of how individuals think, both deductively and indicatively, and which postulates that individuals construct mental models of possibilities in the world. The model method enhances both the accuracy and speed of reasoning. The article concludes with some general reflections on the role of knowledge of meanings, the world, and context in thinking.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0380-24.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article allows readers to assess their ability to detect errors in thinking in seven case histories of psychologists' thoughts about cognitive science. It explains the nature of the errors and shows that some of them reflect faulty reasoning. It presents a "model method" to improve reasoning. It is based on the theory of mental models, which gives a general account of how individuals think, both deductively and indicatively, and which postulates that individuals construct mental models of possibilities in the world. The model method enhances both the accuracy and speed of reasoning. The article concludes with some general reflections on the role of knowledge of meanings, the world, and context in thinking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知科学的思维误区及如何减少误区》。
这篇文章让读者从心理学家对认知科学的思考的七个案例中评估自己发现思维错误的能力。文章解释了错误的性质,并指出其中一些错误反映了错误的推理。它提出了一种改进推理的 "模型方法"。它以心理模型理论为基础,该理论对个人如何进行演绎性和指示性思维进行了总体阐述,并假设个人构建了世界上各种可能性的心理模型。模型法既能提高推理的准确性,又能加快推理的速度。文章最后对有关意义、世界和背景的知识在思维中的作用进行了一般性思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
期刊最新文献
Sex-Dependent Changes in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neuron Voltage-Gated Potassium Currents in a Mouse Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Bilateral Alignment of Receptive Fields in the Olfactory Cortex. Peripheral CaV2.2 channels in skin regulate prolonged heat hypersensitivity during neuroinflammation. The Neural Correlates of Spontaneous Beat Processing and Its Relationship with Music-Related Characteristics of the Individual. The Orbitofrontal Cortex Is Required for Learned Modulation of Innate Olfactory Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1