TFTL: A Task-Free Transfer Learning Strategy for EEG-based Cross-Subject & Cross-Dataset Motor Imagery BCI.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1109/TBME.2024.3474049
Yihan Wang, Jiaxing Wang, Weiqun Wang, Jianqiang Su, Chayut Bunterngchit, Zeng-Guang Hou
{"title":"TFTL: A Task-Free Transfer Learning Strategy for EEG-based Cross-Subject & Cross-Dataset Motor Imagery BCI.","authors":"Yihan Wang, Jiaxing Wang, Weiqun Wang, Jianqiang Su, Chayut Bunterngchit, Zeng-Guang Hou","doi":"10.1109/TBME.2024.3474049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces (MI-BCIs) have been playing an increasingly vital role in neural rehabilitation. However, the long-term task-based calibration required for enhanced model performance leads to an unfriendly user experience, while the inadequacy of EEG data hinders the performance of deep learning models. To address these challenges, a task-free transfer learning strategy (TFTL) for EEG-based cross-subject & cross-dataset MI-BCI is proposed for calibration time reduction and multi-center data co-modeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TFTL strategy consists of data alignment, shared feature extractor, and specific classifiers, in which the label predictor for MI tasks classification, as well as domain and dataset discriminator for inter-subject variability reduction are concurrently optimized for knowledge transfer from subjects across different datasets to the target subject. Moreover, only resting data of the target subject is used for subject-specific model construction to achieve task-free.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We employed three deep learning methods (ShallowConvNet, EEGNet, and TCNet-Fusion) as baseline approaches to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy on five datasets (BCIC IV Dataset 2a, Dataset 1, Physionet MI, Dreyer 2023, and OpenBMI). The results demonstrate a significant improvement with the inclusion of the TFTL strategy compared to the baseline methods, reaching a maximum enhancement of 15.67% with a statistical significance (p=2.4e-5<0.05). Moreover, task-free resulted in MI trials needed for calibration being 0 for all datasets, which significantly alleviated the calibration burden for patients before usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/significance: </strong>The proposed TFTL strategy effectively addresses challenges posed by prolonged calibration periods and insufficient EEG data, thus promoting MI-BCI from laboratory to clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":13245,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2024.3474049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces (MI-BCIs) have been playing an increasingly vital role in neural rehabilitation. However, the long-term task-based calibration required for enhanced model performance leads to an unfriendly user experience, while the inadequacy of EEG data hinders the performance of deep learning models. To address these challenges, a task-free transfer learning strategy (TFTL) for EEG-based cross-subject & cross-dataset MI-BCI is proposed for calibration time reduction and multi-center data co-modeling.

Methods: TFTL strategy consists of data alignment, shared feature extractor, and specific classifiers, in which the label predictor for MI tasks classification, as well as domain and dataset discriminator for inter-subject variability reduction are concurrently optimized for knowledge transfer from subjects across different datasets to the target subject. Moreover, only resting data of the target subject is used for subject-specific model construction to achieve task-free.

Results: We employed three deep learning methods (ShallowConvNet, EEGNet, and TCNet-Fusion) as baseline approaches to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy on five datasets (BCIC IV Dataset 2a, Dataset 1, Physionet MI, Dreyer 2023, and OpenBMI). The results demonstrate a significant improvement with the inclusion of the TFTL strategy compared to the baseline methods, reaching a maximum enhancement of 15.67% with a statistical significance (p=2.4e-5<0.05). Moreover, task-free resulted in MI trials needed for calibration being 0 for all datasets, which significantly alleviated the calibration burden for patients before usage.

Conclusion/significance: The proposed TFTL strategy effectively addresses challenges posed by prolonged calibration periods and insufficient EEG data, thus promoting MI-BCI from laboratory to clinical application.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TFTL:基于脑电图的跨主体和跨数据集运动想象 BCI 的无任务迁移学习策略。
目的:基于运动图像的脑机接口(MI-BCI)在神经康复中发挥着越来越重要的作用。然而,提高模型性能所需的基于任务的长期校准导致了不友好的用户体验,而脑电图数据的不足则阻碍了深度学习模型的性能。为了应对这些挑战,我们提出了一种基于脑电图的跨受试者和跨数据集 MI-BCI 的无任务迁移学习策略(TFTL),以缩短校准时间并进行多中心数据协同建模:TFTL 策略由数据对齐、共享特征提取器和特定分类器组成,其中用于 MI 任务分类的标签预测器以及用于减少受试者间变异性的领域和数据集判别器同时进行了优化,以实现从不同数据集的受试者到目标受试者的知识转移。此外,只有目标受试者的静息数据被用于特定受试者模型的构建,以实现无任务:我们采用了三种深度学习方法(ShallowConvNet、EEGNet 和 TCNet-Fusion)作为基线方法,在五个数据集(BCIC IV Dataset 2a、Dataset 1、Physionet MI、Dreyer 2023 和 OpenBMI)上评估了拟议策略的有效性。结果表明,与基线方法相比,采用 TFTL 策略后,数据集的性能有了显著提高,最高提高了 15.67%,且具有统计学意义(p=2.4e-5):所提出的 TFTL 策略能有效解决校准时间过长和脑电图数据不足所带来的挑战,从而推动 MI-BCI 从实验室走向临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
880
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering contains basic and applied papers dealing with biomedical engineering. Papers range from engineering development in methods and techniques with biomedical applications to experimental and clinical investigations with engineering contributions.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Front Cover IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Handling Editors Information IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Information IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Information for Authors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1