Immediate Implants in Fibulas: Does the Implant to Fibula Osteotomy Distance Impact Early Implant Failure?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2024.09.001
Timothy W. Neal DDS, MD , Fayette C. Williams DDS, MD , Brian R. Carr DMD, MD , Taylor Pankey DDS , Kari Teigen MPH , Roderick Y. Kim DDS, MD, MBA
{"title":"Immediate Implants in Fibulas: Does the Implant to Fibula Osteotomy Distance Impact Early Implant Failure?","authors":"Timothy W. Neal DDS, MD ,&nbsp;Fayette C. Williams DDS, MD ,&nbsp;Brian R. Carr DMD, MD ,&nbsp;Taylor Pankey DDS ,&nbsp;Kari Teigen MPH ,&nbsp;Roderick Y. Kim DDS, MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>When placing dental implants in the free fibula flap, the osteotomy cut edge poses a unique challenge in that an optimal distance has not yet been established.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The study aimed to measure the association between implant-to-fibula osteotomy edge distance and early implant failure in patients who received free fibula flap reconstruction with immediate implants.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design, Setting, Sample</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was designed and implemented. The study population was composed of patients who underwent free fibula flap transfer with immediate dental implant placement for the treatment of benign or malignant conditions of the head and neck from 2015 to 2022 at John Peter Smith Hospital. Subjects were excluded if the implant was in the middle of the free flap bordered by adjacent implants, was &gt;10 mm from the osteotomy edge, or had insertional torque values of ≤30 Ncm.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor Variable</h3><div>Primary predictor variable was the implant distance in millimeters from the fibula osteotomy edge.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Variable</h3><div>Primary outcome variable was early implant failure, defined as implant exfoliation noted by the patient or failure due to implant movement or pain necessitating explantation within 6 months of placement.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>The covariates were age, sex, diabetes diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, smoking status, history of head and neck radiation, pathology treated, and if postoperative radiation treatment was received.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>A generalized estimating equations model was used to assess the relation between the primary predictor and outcome. A <em>P</em> value of &lt;.05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample was composed of 48 subjects who had 130 implants placed, with early failures occurring in 5 implants (3.9%) in 3 subjects. The mean age of the sample was 49 years (standard deviation [SD] 20) and 29 (60%) were male. The mean implant distances for early failures and nonfailures were 3.5 mm (SD 1.04) and 4.3 mm (SD 1.5), respectively. There was a statistically significant relation between implant distance and early implant failure (<em>P</em> = .005, odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.85).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3><div>This study found that shorter distances between the implant and the edge of the fibula osteotomy are associated with early implant failure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"82 12","pages":"Pages 1620-1626"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278239124008413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

When placing dental implants in the free fibula flap, the osteotomy cut edge poses a unique challenge in that an optimal distance has not yet been established.

Purpose

The study aimed to measure the association between implant-to-fibula osteotomy edge distance and early implant failure in patients who received free fibula flap reconstruction with immediate implants.

Study Design, Setting, Sample

A retrospective cohort study was designed and implemented. The study population was composed of patients who underwent free fibula flap transfer with immediate dental implant placement for the treatment of benign or malignant conditions of the head and neck from 2015 to 2022 at John Peter Smith Hospital. Subjects were excluded if the implant was in the middle of the free flap bordered by adjacent implants, was >10 mm from the osteotomy edge, or had insertional torque values of ≤30 Ncm.

Predictor Variable

Primary predictor variable was the implant distance in millimeters from the fibula osteotomy edge.

Main Outcome Variable

Primary outcome variable was early implant failure, defined as implant exfoliation noted by the patient or failure due to implant movement or pain necessitating explantation within 6 months of placement.

Covariates

The covariates were age, sex, diabetes diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, smoking status, history of head and neck radiation, pathology treated, and if postoperative radiation treatment was received.

Analyses

A generalized estimating equations model was used to assess the relation between the primary predictor and outcome. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The sample was composed of 48 subjects who had 130 implants placed, with early failures occurring in 5 implants (3.9%) in 3 subjects. The mean age of the sample was 49 years (standard deviation [SD] 20) and 29 (60%) were male. The mean implant distances for early failures and nonfailures were 3.5 mm (SD 1.04) and 4.3 mm (SD 1.5), respectively. There was a statistically significant relation between implant distance and early implant failure (P = .005, odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.85).

Conclusion and Relevance

This study found that shorter distances between the implant and the edge of the fibula osteotomy are associated with early implant failure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腓骨即刻种植体:种植体与腓骨截骨距离是否会影响早期种植失败?
背景:目的:该研究旨在测量接受游离腓骨瓣重建即刻种植的患者种植体到腓骨截骨边缘的距离与早期种植失败之间的关系:设计并实施了一项回顾性队列研究。研究对象为2015年至2022年期间在约翰-彼得-史密斯医院接受游离腓骨瓣转移并即刻植入种植体治疗头颈部良性或恶性疾病的患者。如果种植体位于游离腓骨瓣中间,与相邻种植体接壤,距离截骨边缘>10 mm,或插入扭矩值≤30 Ncm,则排除受试者:主要预测变量是以毫米为单位的植入物与腓骨截骨边缘的距离:主要结果变量为早期种植失败,即患者发现的种植体脱落或种植体移动导致的失败,或种植体植入后6个月内出现疼痛而必须更换种植体:协变量包括年龄、性别、糖尿病诊断、美国麻醉医师协会分类、吸烟状况、头颈部放射史、所治疗的病理、术后是否接受放射治疗:分析:采用广义估计方程模型评估主要预测指标与结果之间的关系。结果样本由 48 名受试者组成,他们共植入了 130 个种植体,其中 3 名受试者的 5 个种植体(3.9%)出现了早期失败。样本的平均年龄为 49 岁(标准差 [SD] 20),29 人(60%)为男性。早期失败和未失败种植体的平均种植距离分别为 3.5 毫米(标准差 1.04)和 4.3 毫米(标准差 1.5)。种植体距离与早期种植失败之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系(P = .005,几率比 0.6,95% 置信区间 0.39 至 0.85):本研究发现,种植体与腓骨截骨边缘之间的距离较短与种植体早期失败有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: This monthly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments and diagnostic equipment and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association.
期刊最新文献
Does Varying Platelet-Rich Fibrin Centri̇fugati̇on Protocols Enhance New Bone Formati̇on in Extracti̇on Site? Fluorescence Visualization-Guided Surgery Improves Local Control for Mandibular Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Do Postoperative Surgeon Phone Calls Improve Outcomes Following Mandibular Fracture Repair? Geographic Trends in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residency Match. What is the Minimal Perceptible Change for the Dimensional Alteration of Facial Structures in the Frontal View?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1