Beyond the urban-rural divide: Exploring spatial variations in breast cancer outcomes in Queensland, Australia

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2024.102681
Kou Kou , Jessica Cameron , Paramita Dasgupta , Aiden Price , Hao Chen , Derrick Lopez , Kerrie Mengersen , Sandi Hayes , Peter Baade
{"title":"Beyond the urban-rural divide: Exploring spatial variations in breast cancer outcomes in Queensland, Australia","authors":"Kou Kou ,&nbsp;Jessica Cameron ,&nbsp;Paramita Dasgupta ,&nbsp;Aiden Price ,&nbsp;Hao Chen ,&nbsp;Derrick Lopez ,&nbsp;Kerrie Mengersen ,&nbsp;Sandi Hayes ,&nbsp;Peter Baade","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. While previous studies have reported urban and rural differences in breast cancer outcomes, the level of heterogeneity within these broad regions is currently unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Population-level data from Queensland Cancer Register including 58,679 women aged at least 20 years who were diagnosed with breast cancer in Queensland, Australia, 2000–2019 were linked to BreastScreen Queensland and Queensland Hospital Admitted Patients Data Collection to estimate five breast cancer outcomes: incidence, proportion of localised disease and screen-detected cases (via public-funded program), surgical rates, and 5-year survival. Bayesian spatial models were used to smooth outcomes across 512–517 small areas in Queensland.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The incidence of breast cancer was not proportionally distributed, with urban regions having higher rates. Less than half (47 %) of women were diagnosed with localised disease, 91 % had surgery, with five-year relative survival of 92 %. There was no evidence of geographic variation in the proportion of localised disease, surgical rates, or survival over Queensland. Publicly-funded screening detected 38 % of cases, with lower proportion of screen-detected cases observed in Queensland’s urbanised south-east corner.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although the disparities in health outcomes faced by Australians living in rural areas have received increased attention, this study found limited evidence for spatial variation in breast cancer outcomes along the continuum of care across Queensland. These results suggest the detection and management practices for breast cancer may provide an achievable benchmark for other cancer types in reducing the geographical disparity in cancer outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 102681"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782124001607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. While previous studies have reported urban and rural differences in breast cancer outcomes, the level of heterogeneity within these broad regions is currently unknown.

Methods

Population-level data from Queensland Cancer Register including 58,679 women aged at least 20 years who were diagnosed with breast cancer in Queensland, Australia, 2000–2019 were linked to BreastScreen Queensland and Queensland Hospital Admitted Patients Data Collection to estimate five breast cancer outcomes: incidence, proportion of localised disease and screen-detected cases (via public-funded program), surgical rates, and 5-year survival. Bayesian spatial models were used to smooth outcomes across 512–517 small areas in Queensland.

Results

The incidence of breast cancer was not proportionally distributed, with urban regions having higher rates. Less than half (47 %) of women were diagnosed with localised disease, 91 % had surgery, with five-year relative survival of 92 %. There was no evidence of geographic variation in the proportion of localised disease, surgical rates, or survival over Queensland. Publicly-funded screening detected 38 % of cases, with lower proportion of screen-detected cases observed in Queensland’s urbanised south-east corner.

Conclusion

Although the disparities in health outcomes faced by Australians living in rural areas have received increased attention, this study found limited evidence for spatial variation in breast cancer outcomes along the continuum of care across Queensland. These results suggest the detection and management practices for breast cancer may provide an achievable benchmark for other cancer types in reducing the geographical disparity in cancer outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越城乡差别:探索澳大利亚昆士兰州乳腺癌结果的空间差异。
背景:乳腺癌是全球妇女中最常见的癌症。虽然之前的研究报告了城市和农村在乳腺癌结果上的差异,但目前还不清楚这些大区域内的异质性程度:方法:将 2000-2019 年期间澳大利亚昆士兰癌症登记册(包括 58,679 名年龄在 20 岁以上、被诊断患有乳腺癌的女性)中的人口级数据与昆士兰乳腺癌筛查(BreastScreen Queensland)和昆士兰医院住院病人数据收集(Queensland Hospital Admitted Patients Data Collection)联系起来,以估计五种乳腺癌结果:发病率、局部疾病和筛查发现病例(通过公共资助项目)的比例、手术率和 5 年生存率。贝叶斯空间模型用于平滑昆士兰州 512-517 个小区域的结果:结果:乳腺癌的发病率并不是按比例分布的,城市地区的发病率更高。不到一半(47%)的妇女被诊断为局部疾病,91%的妇女接受了手术,五年相对生存率为 92%。没有证据表明昆士兰州的局部疾病比例、手术率或存活率存在地域差异。公费筛查发现了 38% 的病例,昆士兰城市化的东南角地区筛查发现的病例比例较低:尽管生活在农村地区的澳大利亚人所面临的健康结果差异已受到越来越多的关注,但本研究发现,在昆士兰州,乳腺癌治疗结果的空间差异证据有限。这些结果表明,乳腺癌的检测和管理方法可为其他癌症类型提供一个可实现的基准,以减少癌症结果的地域差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology
Cancer Epidemiology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
200
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology is dedicated to increasing understanding about cancer causes, prevention and control. The scope of the journal embraces all aspects of cancer epidemiology including: • Descriptive epidemiology • Studies of risk factors for disease initiation, development and prognosis • Screening and early detection • Prevention and control • Methodological issues The journal publishes original research articles (full length and short reports), systematic reviews and meta-analyses, editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor commenting on previously published research.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the quality of prostate cancer diagnosis recording in CPRD GOLD and CPRD Aurum primary care databases for observational research: A study using linked English electronic health records Differences in recording of cancer diagnosis between datasets in England: A population-based study of linked cancer registration, hospital, and primary care data Trends in incidence, mortality and survival of gastric cancer in Xiamen, China from 2011 to 2020: A population-based study Editorial Board Updated cancer burden in oldest old: A population-based study using 2022 Globocan estimates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1