A Review-Level Sentiment Information Enhanced Multitask Learning Approach for Explainable Recommendation

IF 4.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1109/TCSS.2024.3376728
Fenfang Xie;Yuansheng Wang;Kun Xu;Liang Chen;Zibin Zheng;Mingdong Tang
{"title":"A Review-Level Sentiment Information Enhanced Multitask Learning Approach for Explainable Recommendation","authors":"Fenfang Xie;Yuansheng Wang;Kun Xu;Liang Chen;Zibin Zheng;Mingdong Tang","doi":"10.1109/TCSS.2024.3376728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recommendation system plays a remarkable role in solving the problem of information overload on the Internet. Existing research demonstrates that a recommended list enclosed with appropriate explanations can enhance the transparency of the system and encourage users to make decisions. Although existing works have achieved effective results, they still suffer from at least one of the following limitations: the work either does not use sentiment information or review information, does not explicitly incorporate review-level sentiment information into the model, is based on review retrieval, and generates explanations in the form of templates or phrases. To tackle the above limitations, this article proposes a REview-level Sentiment information enhanced multiTask learning approach for Explainable Recommendation (RESTER). Specifically, it first considers the user's review information and analyzes the sentiment polarity contained in the review. Then, the user/item's identity feature, review feature, and sentiment information are fused into a multitask learning framework by leveraging the implicit correlation between the rating prediction and explanation generation tasks. Comprehensive experiments on datasets in three different domains have shown that the proposed model is superior to all other baselines in both rating prediction and explanation generation tasks.","PeriodicalId":13044,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems","volume":"11 5","pages":"5925-5934"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10509543/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recommendation system plays a remarkable role in solving the problem of information overload on the Internet. Existing research demonstrates that a recommended list enclosed with appropriate explanations can enhance the transparency of the system and encourage users to make decisions. Although existing works have achieved effective results, they still suffer from at least one of the following limitations: the work either does not use sentiment information or review information, does not explicitly incorporate review-level sentiment information into the model, is based on review retrieval, and generates explanations in the form of templates or phrases. To tackle the above limitations, this article proposes a REview-level Sentiment information enhanced multiTask learning approach for Explainable Recommendation (RESTER). Specifically, it first considers the user's review information and analyzes the sentiment polarity contained in the review. Then, the user/item's identity feature, review feature, and sentiment information are fused into a multitask learning framework by leveraging the implicit correlation between the rating prediction and explanation generation tasks. Comprehensive experiments on datasets in three different domains have shown that the proposed model is superior to all other baselines in both rating prediction and explanation generation tasks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于可解释推荐的评论级情感信息增强型多任务学习方法
推荐系统在解决互联网信息过载问题方面发挥着重要作用。现有研究表明,附有适当解释的推荐列表可以提高系统的透明度,鼓励用户做出决策。虽然现有研究已取得了有效成果,但仍存在以下至少一个局限性:未使用情感信息或评论信息、未明确将评论级情感信息纳入模型、基于评论检索、以模板或短语形式生成解释。针对上述局限,本文提出了一种用于可解释推荐的评论级情感信息增强型多任务学习方法(RESTER)。具体来说,它首先考虑用户的评论信息,分析评论中包含的情感极性。然后,利用评分预测和解释生成任务之间的隐含相关性,将用户/项目的身份特征、评论特征和情感信息融合到多任务学习框架中。在三个不同领域的数据集上进行的综合实验表明,所提出的模型在评分预测和解释生成任务方面都优于所有其他基线模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems focuses on such topics as modeling, simulation, analysis and understanding of social systems from the quantitative and/or computational perspective. "Systems" include man-man, man-machine and machine-machine organizations and adversarial situations as well as social media structures and their dynamics. More specifically, the proposed transactions publishes articles on modeling the dynamics of social systems, methodologies for incorporating and representing socio-cultural and behavioral aspects in computational modeling, analysis of social system behavior and structure, and paradigms for social systems modeling and simulation. The journal also features articles on social network dynamics, social intelligence and cognition, social systems design and architectures, socio-cultural modeling and representation, and computational behavior modeling, and their applications.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Information for Authors IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society Information IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Publication Information Computational Aids on Mental Health: Revolutionizing Care in the Digital Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1