Outcomes of low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment in patients with non-HIV pneumocystis pneumonia: A nationwide Japanese retrospective cohort study

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infectious diseases now Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104992
Jumpei Taniguchi , Shotaro Aso , Taisuke Jo , Hiroki Matsui , Kiyohide Fushimi , Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"Outcomes of low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment in patients with non-HIV pneumocystis pneumonia: A nationwide Japanese retrospective cohort study","authors":"Jumpei Taniguchi ,&nbsp;Shotaro Aso ,&nbsp;Taisuke Jo ,&nbsp;Hiroki Matsui ,&nbsp;Kiyohide Fushimi ,&nbsp;Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) may be a treatment option for patients with <em>Pneumocystis jirovecii</em> pneumonia (PCP). However, its effectiveness in patients without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has yet to be thoroughly investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study used data extracted from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database. We included immunocompromised patients without HIV having been diagnosed with PCP and had started TMP-SMX treatment between July 2010 and March 2022. We divided eligible patients into conventional-dose (15.0–20.0 mg/kg/d) and low-dose (7.5–15.0 mg/kg/d) groups and performed propensity-score overlap-weighting analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were completion of the initial treatment and use of alternatives to TMP-SMX for PCP treatment during hospitalization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 4449 eligible patients, 1682 (37.8 %) and 2767 (62.2 %) received conventional- and low-dose TMP-SMX treatments, respectively. No significant difference was observed in in-hospital mortality (risk difference, −1.4 %; 95 % CI, −4.5–1.7 %; <em>P</em> = 0.388). Low-dose TMP-SMX was associated with increased completion of initial treatment (risk difference, 4.6 %; 95 % CI, 2.3–6.9 %; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and reduced use of alternative agents (risk difference, −4.0 %; 95 % CI, −7.4 to −0.6 %; <em>P</em> = 0.020).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Low-dose TMP-SMX may be a treatment option for patients with non-HIV PCP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":"54 8","pages":"Article 104992"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924001593","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) may be a treatment option for patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP). However, its effectiveness in patients without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has yet to be thoroughly investigated.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used data extracted from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database. We included immunocompromised patients without HIV having been diagnosed with PCP and had started TMP-SMX treatment between July 2010 and March 2022. We divided eligible patients into conventional-dose (15.0–20.0 mg/kg/d) and low-dose (7.5–15.0 mg/kg/d) groups and performed propensity-score overlap-weighting analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were completion of the initial treatment and use of alternatives to TMP-SMX for PCP treatment during hospitalization.

Results

Among 4449 eligible patients, 1682 (37.8 %) and 2767 (62.2 %) received conventional- and low-dose TMP-SMX treatments, respectively. No significant difference was observed in in-hospital mortality (risk difference, −1.4 %; 95 % CI, −4.5–1.7 %; P = 0.388). Low-dose TMP-SMX was associated with increased completion of initial treatment (risk difference, 4.6 %; 95 % CI, 2.3–6.9 %; P < 0.001), and reduced use of alternative agents (risk difference, −4.0 %; 95 % CI, −7.4 to −0.6 %; P = 0.020).

Conclusion

Low-dose TMP-SMX may be a treatment option for patients with non-HIV PCP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非艾滋病毒肺孢子菌肺炎患者接受低剂量三甲双胍-磺胺甲噁唑治疗的疗效:日本全国性回顾性队列研究。
目的:低剂量三甲双胍-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)可能是治疗肺孢子虫肺炎(PCP)患者的一种选择。然而,该疗法对未感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)患者的疗效还有待深入研究:这项回顾性队列研究使用了从日本诊断程序组合住院患者数据库中提取的数据。我们纳入了 2010 年 7 月至 2022 年 3 月期间确诊为 PCP 并开始接受 TMP-SMX 治疗的未感染 HIV 的免疫功能低下患者。我们将符合条件的患者分为常规剂量组(15.0-20.0 mg/kg/d)和低剂量组(7.5-15.0 mg/kg/d),并进行了倾向分数重叠加权分析。主要结果是院内死亡率。次要结果是完成初始治疗和在住院期间使用 TMP-SMX 替代品治疗 PCP:在 4449 名符合条件的患者中,分别有 1682 人(37.8%)和 2767 人(62.2%)接受了常规和低剂量 TMP-SMX 治疗。院内死亡率无明显差异(风险差异,-1.4%;95% CI,-4.5-1.7%;P = 0.388)。小剂量 TMP-SMX 与更多患者完成初始治疗有关(风险差异为 4.6%;95 % CI 为 2.3-6.9%;P 结论:小剂量 TMP-SMX 与更多患者完成初始治疗有关(风险差异为 4.6%;95 % CI 为 2.3-6.9%):小剂量 TMP-SMX 可作为非艾滋病毒 PCP 患者的一种治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious diseases now
Infectious diseases now Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
116
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic therapy and prophylaxis of infective endocarditis – A SPILF-AEPEI position statement on the ESC 2023 guidelines Optimising detection of thrombosis in paediatric Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: A prospective interventional sub-study protocol Parkinsonism plus syndrome in neurosyphilis: Clinical insights and brain imaging A step further: Antibiotic stewardship programme in home hospital Impact of EUCAST Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (RAST) on optimal antimicrobial therapy in gram-negative bloodstream infections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1