Managed Entry Agreements for High-Cost, One-Off Potentially Curative Therapies: A Framework and Calculation Tool to Determine Their Suitability.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS PharmacoEconomics Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1007/s40273-024-01433-4
Marcelien H E Callenbach, Rick A Vreman, Christine Leopold, Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse, Wim G Goettsch
{"title":"Managed Entry Agreements for High-Cost, One-Off Potentially Curative Therapies: A Framework and Calculation Tool to Determine Their Suitability.","authors":"Marcelien H E Callenbach, Rick A Vreman, Christine Leopold, Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse, Wim G Goettsch","doi":"10.1007/s40273-024-01433-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To construct a framework and calculation tool to compare the consequences of implementing different payment models for high-cost, one-off potentially curative therapies and enable decision making to ultimately enhance timely patient access to innovative health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A framework outlining steps to determine potentially suitable payment models was developed. Based on the framework, a supporting calculation tool operationalised as an Excel-based model was constructed to quantify the associated costs for an average patient during the timeframe of the intended payment agreement, the total budget impact and associated benefits expressed in quality-adjusted life-years for the total expected lifetime of the patient population. To demonstrate the potential of the framework, three case studies were used: onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma<sup>®</sup>), brexucabtagene autoleucel (Tecartus<sup>®</sup>) and etranacogene dezaparvovec (Hemgenix<sup>®</sup>). A hypothetical case study was used to illustrate the output of the calculation tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Part 1 of the framework presents steps for matching a suitable reimbursement and payment model with the disease and treatment characteristics. The reimbursement and payment models are further specified in Part 2. Part 3 guides end users through the setup of a calculation tool with which the financial impact can be calculated of two payment models: a price discount model and an outcome-based spread payment model with a discount. Part 4 concerns the output of the calculation tool, showing how different payment models lead to different financial consequences under three assumptions of longer term effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presented framework provides decision makers with insight into the financial consequences of their chosen payment model under different assumptions. This can aid reimbursement negotiations by clarifying the optimal choice given a therapy's characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":19807,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-024-01433-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To construct a framework and calculation tool to compare the consequences of implementing different payment models for high-cost, one-off potentially curative therapies and enable decision making to ultimately enhance timely patient access to innovative health interventions.

Methods: A framework outlining steps to determine potentially suitable payment models was developed. Based on the framework, a supporting calculation tool operationalised as an Excel-based model was constructed to quantify the associated costs for an average patient during the timeframe of the intended payment agreement, the total budget impact and associated benefits expressed in quality-adjusted life-years for the total expected lifetime of the patient population. To demonstrate the potential of the framework, three case studies were used: onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®), brexucabtagene autoleucel (Tecartus®) and etranacogene dezaparvovec (Hemgenix®). A hypothetical case study was used to illustrate the output of the calculation tool.

Results: Part 1 of the framework presents steps for matching a suitable reimbursement and payment model with the disease and treatment characteristics. The reimbursement and payment models are further specified in Part 2. Part 3 guides end users through the setup of a calculation tool with which the financial impact can be calculated of two payment models: a price discount model and an outcome-based spread payment model with a discount. Part 4 concerns the output of the calculation tool, showing how different payment models lead to different financial consequences under three assumptions of longer term effectiveness.

Conclusions: The presented framework provides decision makers with insight into the financial consequences of their chosen payment model under different assumptions. This can aid reimbursement negotiations by clarifying the optimal choice given a therapy's characteristics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高成本、一次性潜在治疗方法的托管进入协议:确定其适用性的框架和计算工具。
目的构建一个框架和计算工具,以比较对高成本、一次性潜在治疗方法实施不同支付模式的后果,并帮助做出决策,最终使患者能够及时获得创新的医疗干预措施:方法:制定了一个框架,概述了确定潜在合适支付模式的步骤。在该框架的基础上,构建了一个辅助计算工具,该工具以 Excel 模型的形式运行,用于量化在预定支付协议的时间框架内普通患者的相关成本、总预算影响以及以患者总预期寿命的质量调整生命年表示的相关收益。为了展示该框架的潜力,我们使用了三个案例研究:onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®), brexucabtagene autoleucel (Tecartus®) 和 etranacogene dezaparvovec (Hemgenix®) 。一项假设案例研究用于说明计算工具的输出结果:结果:框架的第一部分介绍了根据疾病和治疗特点匹配合适的报销和支付模式的步骤。第 2 部分进一步明确了报销和支付模式。第 3 部分指导最终用户设置计算工具,利用该工具可以计算两种支付模式的财务影响:价格折扣模式和基于结果的差价折扣支付模式。第 4 部分涉及计算工具的输出结果,说明在三种长期有效性假设下,不同的支付模式如何导致不同的财务后果:本文提出的框架使决策者能够深入了解其所选择的支付模式在不同假设条件下的财务后果。结论:所介绍的框架可让决策者了解其所选择的支付模式在不同假设条件下的财务后果,从而明确根据疗法的特点做出的最佳选择,从而有助于补偿谈判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PharmacoEconomics
PharmacoEconomics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics is the benchmark journal for peer-reviewed, authoritative and practical articles on the application of pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life assessment to optimum drug therapy and health outcomes. An invaluable source of applied pharmacoeconomic original research and educational material for the healthcare decision maker. PharmacoEconomics is dedicated to the clear communication of complex pharmacoeconomic issues related to patient care and drug utilization. PharmacoEconomics offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article.
期刊最新文献
Design and Features of Pricing and Payment Schemes for Health Technologies: A Scoping Review and a Proposal for a Flexible Need-Driven Classification. Economic Burden Associated with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the United States. The Impact of Tocilizumab Coverage on Health Equity for Inpatients with COVID-19 in the USA: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Managed Entry Agreements for High-Cost, One-Off Potentially Curative Therapies: A Framework and Calculation Tool to Determine Their Suitability. How Much Better is Faster? Empirical Tests of QALY Assumptions in Health-Outcome Sequences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1