Free-Cell Area Impact on Stroke Prevention in Asymptomatic Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stenting: The "Carotid Artery sTenting And CeLl-area Impact on Stroke and Major Adverse events" (CATACLISMA) Multicenter Registry.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-06 DOI:10.1177/15266028241283336
Claudio Desantis, Sergio Zacà, Pietro Boggia, Danilo Menna, Andrea Spertino, Davide Esposito, Vincenzo Palermo, Federico Fontana, Andrea Esposito, Gabriele Piffaretti, Michele Antonello, Massimo Ruggiero, Raffaele Pulli, Domenico Angiletta
{"title":"Free-Cell Area Impact on Stroke Prevention in Asymptomatic Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stenting: The \"Carotid Artery sTenting And CeLl-area Impact on Stroke and Major Adverse events\" (CATACLISMA) Multicenter Registry.","authors":"Claudio Desantis, Sergio Zacà, Pietro Boggia, Danilo Menna, Andrea Spertino, Davide Esposito, Vincenzo Palermo, Federico Fontana, Andrea Esposito, Gabriele Piffaretti, Michele Antonello, Massimo Ruggiero, Raffaele Pulli, Domenico Angiletta","doi":"10.1177/15266028241283336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study investigated the association between cell-stent area and cerebrovascular events incidence in asymptomatic patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is an observational, retrospective, multicenter, cohort study. Between 2012 and 2022, all patients undergoing primary CAS for severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis were evaluated. Three groups were defined on the basis of the cell area (open cell, OC; closed cell, CC; double layer, DL). Periprocedural primary outcomes were 30-day stroke, mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse event (MAE, stroke/mortality composite outcome) rates. Follow-up primary outcomes included overall survival, stroke-free survival (SFS), freedom from ipsilateral stroke (FFiS), and freedom from stroke-related mortality (FF-SRM). Data were analyzed at short-term (1 year) and mid-term (2.5 years) period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1096 CAS were considered (787 men, 71.8%, median age = 74 years). Technical success was achieved in 99.5% procedures. Periprocedural 30-day stroke rate was 1.5% (OC: 1.1%, CC: 2.3%, DL: 1%, p=0.27), mortality was 0.7% (OC: 1.1%, CC: 0.3%, DL: 0.5%, p=0.35), and no MI was recorded. The MAE rate was 2.1% (OC: 2%, CC: 2.6%, DL: 1.5%, p=0.66). Median follow-up was 46 months. At 1 and 2.5 years, estimated overall survival was 96.1% and 91% (p=0.41), SFS was 99.1% and 98.2% (p=0.007, CC stroke rates 2.9% and 4.2% at timepoints), FFiS was 99.4% and 99% (p=0.014, CC FFiS rates 1.7% and 2.6% at timepoints) and FF-SRM was 99.5% and 99% (p=0.28). During follow-up, no stroke events occurred in DL group. CC design showed higher rates of any (4.2%) and ipsilateral stroke (2.6%) within 2.5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In asymptomatic patients undergoing CAS, the contemporary overall stroke incidence is 1.5%. No statistical differences were observed in terms of 30-day stroke incidence among groups. The closed free-cell area showed higher rates of any and ipsilateral stroke within 2.5 years. The DL stents may offer the best available performances in terms of mid-term stroke prevention.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>The study analyzed the contemporary results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) focusing on the impact of cell-stent area on peri- and post-operative cerebrovascular events in a multicenter real-world experience. In asymptomatic patients undergoing CAS the contemporary overall stroke incidence is 1.5%. No statistical differences were observed in terms of 30-day stroke incidence among groups. The closed free-cell area showed higher rates of any and ipsilateral stroke within 2.5 years. DL stents may offer the best available performances in terms of mid-term stroke prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028241283336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241283336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study investigated the association between cell-stent area and cerebrovascular events incidence in asymptomatic patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Materials and methods: This is an observational, retrospective, multicenter, cohort study. Between 2012 and 2022, all patients undergoing primary CAS for severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis were evaluated. Three groups were defined on the basis of the cell area (open cell, OC; closed cell, CC; double layer, DL). Periprocedural primary outcomes were 30-day stroke, mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and major adverse event (MAE, stroke/mortality composite outcome) rates. Follow-up primary outcomes included overall survival, stroke-free survival (SFS), freedom from ipsilateral stroke (FFiS), and freedom from stroke-related mortality (FF-SRM). Data were analyzed at short-term (1 year) and mid-term (2.5 years) period.

Results: A total of 1096 CAS were considered (787 men, 71.8%, median age = 74 years). Technical success was achieved in 99.5% procedures. Periprocedural 30-day stroke rate was 1.5% (OC: 1.1%, CC: 2.3%, DL: 1%, p=0.27), mortality was 0.7% (OC: 1.1%, CC: 0.3%, DL: 0.5%, p=0.35), and no MI was recorded. The MAE rate was 2.1% (OC: 2%, CC: 2.6%, DL: 1.5%, p=0.66). Median follow-up was 46 months. At 1 and 2.5 years, estimated overall survival was 96.1% and 91% (p=0.41), SFS was 99.1% and 98.2% (p=0.007, CC stroke rates 2.9% and 4.2% at timepoints), FFiS was 99.4% and 99% (p=0.014, CC FFiS rates 1.7% and 2.6% at timepoints) and FF-SRM was 99.5% and 99% (p=0.28). During follow-up, no stroke events occurred in DL group. CC design showed higher rates of any (4.2%) and ipsilateral stroke (2.6%) within 2.5 years.

Conclusion: In asymptomatic patients undergoing CAS, the contemporary overall stroke incidence is 1.5%. No statistical differences were observed in terms of 30-day stroke incidence among groups. The closed free-cell area showed higher rates of any and ipsilateral stroke within 2.5 years. The DL stents may offer the best available performances in terms of mid-term stroke prevention.

Clinical impact: The study analyzed the contemporary results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) focusing on the impact of cell-stent area on peri- and post-operative cerebrovascular events in a multicenter real-world experience. In asymptomatic patients undergoing CAS the contemporary overall stroke incidence is 1.5%. No statistical differences were observed in terms of 30-day stroke incidence among groups. The closed free-cell area showed higher rates of any and ipsilateral stroke within 2.5 years. DL stents may offer the best available performances in terms of mid-term stroke prevention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
游离细胞面积对接受颈动脉支架植入术的无症状患者预防中风的影响:颈动脉支架置入术和游离细胞面积对中风和主要不良事件的影响"(CATACLISMA)多中心登记。
目的:该研究调查了接受颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)的无症状患者的细胞支架面积与脑血管事件发生率之间的关系:这是一项观察性、回顾性、多中心、队列研究。2012年至2022年期间,对所有因严重无症状颈动脉狭窄而接受初级CAS手术的患者进行了评估。根据细胞面积分为三组(开放细胞,OC;封闭细胞,CC;双层细胞,DL)。围手术期的主要结果是30天卒中、死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)和主要不良事件(MAE,卒中/死亡率复合结果)发生率。随访主要结果包括总生存率、无卒中生存率(SFS)、无同侧卒中(FFiS)和无卒中相关死亡率(FF-SRM)。对短期(1 年)和中期(2.5 年)的数据进行了分析:共考虑了 1096 例 CAS(787 例男性,71.8%,中位年龄 = 74 岁)。99.5%的手术取得了技术成功。围手术期 30 天中风率为 1.5%(OC:1.1%,CC:2.3%,DL:1%,P=0.27),死亡率为 0.7%(OC:1.1%,CC:0.3%,DL:0.5%,P=0.35),无心肌梗死记录。MAE率为2.1%(OC:2%,CC:2.6%,DL:1.5%,P=0.66)。中位随访时间为 46 个月。1 年和 2.5 年时,估计总生存率分别为 96.1% 和 91%(p=0.41),SFS 分别为 99.1% 和 98.2%(p=0.007,CC 中风率在时间点分别为 2.9% 和 4.2%),FFiS 分别为 99.4% 和 99%(p=0.014,CC FFiS 率在时间点分别为 1.7% 和 2.6%),FF-SRM 分别为 99.5% 和 99%(p=0.28)。随访期间,DL 组未发生中风事件。CC组在2.5年内发生任何卒中(4.2%)和同侧卒中(2.6%)的比例较高:结论:在接受 CAS 手术的无症状患者中,当代总中风发生率为 1.5%。各组间 30 天脑卒中发生率无统计学差异。封闭的游离细胞区在 2.5 年内发生任何中风和同侧中风的比例较高。就中期中风预防而言,DL 支架可能是目前性能最好的支架:该研究分析了颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的当代效果,重点关注多中心实际经验中细胞支架面积对围术期和术后脑血管事件的影响。在接受 CAS 的无症状患者中,当代总中风发生率为 1.5%。各组间 30 天脑卒中发生率无统计学差异。封闭的游离细胞区在 2.5 年内发生任何中风和同侧中风的比例较高。就中期中风预防而言,DL 支架可能是目前性能最好的支架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
The Value of Different Systemic Inflammatory Response Indicators in the Long-term Prognosis of Type B Aortic Dissection Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair. Effect of Statins on the Prognosis After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Patients With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection. Potential of D-Dimer as a Tool to Rule Out Sac Expansion in Patients With Persistent Type 2 Endoleaks After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Long-Term Outcomes and Late Complications of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using the GORE TAG or Conformable GORE TAG. Long-term Outcomes of the AcoArt II-BTK Trial: Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Uncoated Balloons for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1