The association between anxiety and depression symptoms and pain and function in adolescents and young adults with chronic pain: A meta-analysis

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Psychosomatic Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111945
Nicole Harte , Rachel V. Aaron , Kavya Bhattiprolu , Madelyne A. Bisby , Milena Gandy , Taylor Hathway , Blake F. Dear , Joanne Dudeney
{"title":"The association between anxiety and depression symptoms and pain and function in adolescents and young adults with chronic pain: A meta-analysis","authors":"Nicole Harte ,&nbsp;Rachel V. Aaron ,&nbsp;Kavya Bhattiprolu ,&nbsp;Madelyne A. Bisby ,&nbsp;Milena Gandy ,&nbsp;Taylor Hathway ,&nbsp;Blake F. Dear ,&nbsp;Joanne Dudeney","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Chronic pain in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is associated with adverse functional and psychological outcomes; however, inconsistent findings across studies necessitate a comprehensive synthesis. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify associations between anxiety, depression, and pain/functional outcomes, and explore study and sample moderators, such as age, sex, pain duration, recruitment setting, and measurement tools.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and Embase through May 2024. included 57 studies (<em>N</em> = 12,603) of AYAs aged 12–25 years with chronic pain. Risk of bias and GRADE assessments were conducted. Pearson r correlations were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Small associations were found between anxiety, depression, and heightened pain intensity (<em>r</em> = 0.20, 0.24). Moderate-to-large associations were observed between anxiety, depression, and disability (<em>r</em> = 0.32, 0.34), pain interference (<em>r</em> = 0.47, 0.51), pain catastrophizing (both <em>r</em> = 0.50), and poorer quality of life (<em>r</em> = −0.56, −0.61). Anxiety had stronger correlations with pain intensity and catastrophizing in samples with more males. Anxiety measure moderated the anxiety-pain intensity relationship. Depression had stronger correlations with pain intensity for shorter pain duration, and catastrophizing and pain interference for longer pain durations. The depression-catastrophizing association was stronger in older samples.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Anxiety and depression significantly impact the chronic pain experience in AYAs, with stronger effects on functional outcomes and quality of life than pain intensity. Tailored interventions that consider age, sex, and pain duration may enhance treatment outcomes in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 111945"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002239992400357X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Chronic pain in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is associated with adverse functional and psychological outcomes; however, inconsistent findings across studies necessitate a comprehensive synthesis. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify associations between anxiety, depression, and pain/functional outcomes, and explore study and sample moderators, such as age, sex, pain duration, recruitment setting, and measurement tools.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and Embase through May 2024. included 57 studies (N = 12,603) of AYAs aged 12–25 years with chronic pain. Risk of bias and GRADE assessments were conducted. Pearson r correlations were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model.

Results

Small associations were found between anxiety, depression, and heightened pain intensity (r = 0.20, 0.24). Moderate-to-large associations were observed between anxiety, depression, and disability (r = 0.32, 0.34), pain interference (r = 0.47, 0.51), pain catastrophizing (both r = 0.50), and poorer quality of life (r = −0.56, −0.61). Anxiety had stronger correlations with pain intensity and catastrophizing in samples with more males. Anxiety measure moderated the anxiety-pain intensity relationship. Depression had stronger correlations with pain intensity for shorter pain duration, and catastrophizing and pain interference for longer pain durations. The depression-catastrophizing association was stronger in older samples.

Conclusion

Anxiety and depression significantly impact the chronic pain experience in AYAs, with stronger effects on functional outcomes and quality of life than pain intensity. Tailored interventions that consider age, sex, and pain duration may enhance treatment outcomes in this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有慢性疼痛的青少年中焦虑和抑郁症状与疼痛和功能之间的关系:荟萃分析
目的:青少年和年轻成人(AYAs)的慢性疼痛与不良的功能和心理结果有关;然而,由于各项研究的结果不一致,因此有必要进行综合分析。本荟萃分析旨在量化焦虑、抑郁和疼痛/功能性结果之间的关联,并探讨研究和样本调节因素,如年龄、性别、疼痛持续时间、招募环境和测量工具等:我们检索了截至 2024 年 5 月的 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CENTRAL 和 Embase,共纳入 57 项研究(N = 12603),研究对象为 12-25 岁患有慢性疼痛的青少年。进行了偏倚风险和 GRADE 评估。采用随机效应模型对 Pearson r 相关性进行了元分析:焦虑、抑郁和疼痛强度增加之间存在微小关联(r = 0.20、0.24)。焦虑、抑郁与残疾(r = 0.32,0.34)、疼痛干扰(r = 0.47,0.51)、疼痛灾难化(均为 r = 0.50)和较差的生活质量(r = -0.56,-0.61)之间存在中度至高度关联。在男性较多的样本中,焦虑与疼痛强度和灾难化的相关性更强。焦虑测量调节了焦虑与疼痛强度之间的关系。在疼痛持续时间较短的样本中,抑郁与疼痛强度的相关性更强;在疼痛持续时间较长的样本中,灾难化与疼痛干扰的相关性更强。在年龄较大的样本中,抑郁与灾难化的相关性更强:结论:焦虑和抑郁会严重影响亚健康人群的慢性疼痛体验,与疼痛强度相比,焦虑和抑郁对功能结果和生活质量的影响更大。考虑年龄、性别和疼痛持续时间的定制干预措施可提高该人群的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing immunotherapy outcomes in advanced NSCLC: The role of sleep hygiene education and physical exercise as non-pharmacological interventions Resilience, psychosomatic health, and support needs of Ukrainian healthcare professionals in wartime: A cross-sectional study Metabolomics profiling of Type D personality traits Heart rate variability is not associated with multiple chemical sensitivity in a cross-sectional population-based study - The Danish study of functional disorders Clinical and metabolic correlates of DSM-5 mixed features in subjects with bipolar depression and mania: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1