Bias related to overweight and obesity among French psychiatrists: Results of a national survey.

Léonie Sohier, Marie-Sophie Ravet, Aurélie Berger-Vergiat, Sylvain Iceta
{"title":"Bias related to overweight and obesity among French psychiatrists: Results of a national survey.","authors":"Léonie Sohier, Marie-Sophie Ravet, Aurélie Berger-Vergiat, Sylvain Iceta","doi":"10.1016/j.encep.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to people with a higher weight, physicians are the second most stigmatizing group related to excess weight. As a result of these weight-related biases, the therapeutic relationship with the patient and the quality of care would be negatively affected. In addition, this stigma could negatively impact the clinical practice related to higher weight and avoidance of care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the stigma of overweight and obesity among psychiatric residents and psychiatrists in France. Specifically, the study aimed to assess factors that may influence weight-related bias among psychiatrists, to explore the relevance of visual assessment of body mass index, and to determine how they this feature is integrated into their practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online questionnaire including sociodemographic items, the Fat Phobia Scale, the Beliefs About Obese Persons Scale, the Body Shape Scales, and questions about their clinical practice was distributed via national professional mailing lists and social networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was answered by 271 seniors or residents in psychiatry. The results indicated a moderate level of weight-related bias among psychiatrists as assessed by the Fat Phobia Scale which was higher in residents than in senior psychiatrists. Over a third of the respondents had no material to assess their patient's weight, and two thirds did not systematically assess overweight or obesity. Finally, the results demonstrate that psychiatrists failed to accurately evaluate overweight or obesity based on male or female silhouettes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It appears that measures should be taken to raise awareness among psychiatrists of the stigmatization of individuals living with a higher weight, as well as to enhance the quality of weight gain care in psychiatry.</p>","PeriodicalId":51042,"journal":{"name":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2024.06.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: According to people with a higher weight, physicians are the second most stigmatizing group related to excess weight. As a result of these weight-related biases, the therapeutic relationship with the patient and the quality of care would be negatively affected. In addition, this stigma could negatively impact the clinical practice related to higher weight and avoidance of care.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the stigma of overweight and obesity among psychiatric residents and psychiatrists in France. Specifically, the study aimed to assess factors that may influence weight-related bias among psychiatrists, to explore the relevance of visual assessment of body mass index, and to determine how they this feature is integrated into their practice.

Method: An online questionnaire including sociodemographic items, the Fat Phobia Scale, the Beliefs About Obese Persons Scale, the Body Shape Scales, and questions about their clinical practice was distributed via national professional mailing lists and social networks.

Results: The survey was answered by 271 seniors or residents in psychiatry. The results indicated a moderate level of weight-related bias among psychiatrists as assessed by the Fat Phobia Scale which was higher in residents than in senior psychiatrists. Over a third of the respondents had no material to assess their patient's weight, and two thirds did not systematically assess overweight or obesity. Finally, the results demonstrate that psychiatrists failed to accurately evaluate overweight or obesity based on male or female silhouettes.

Conclusion: It appears that measures should be taken to raise awareness among psychiatrists of the stigmatization of individuals living with a higher weight, as well as to enhance the quality of weight gain care in psychiatry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国精神科医生对超重和肥胖的偏见:一项全国性调查的结果。
背景:据体重较重的人称,医生是与超重有关的第二大鄙视群体。由于这些与体重有关的偏见,与病人的治疗关系和护理质量将受到负面影响。此外,这种成见还可能对与体重增加和逃避治疗有关的临床实践产生负面影响:本研究旨在评估法国精神科住院医生和精神科医生对超重和肥胖的成见。具体而言,该研究旨在评估可能影响精神科医生与体重有关的偏见的因素,探讨目测体重指数的相关性,并确定他们如何将这一特征融入其实践中:方法:通过国家专业邮件列表和社交网络发布了一份在线调查问卷,其中包括社会人口学项目、肥胖恐惧症量表、对肥胖者的看法量表、体形量表以及有关其临床实践的问题:共有 271 名精神病学专业的高年级学生或住院医生回答了调查问卷。结果显示,精神病学家在体重方面存在一定程度的偏差,这可以通过 "脂肪恐惧症量表 "来评估,住院精神病学家的 "脂肪恐惧症量表 "高于资深精神病学家的 "脂肪恐惧症量表"。超过三分之一的受访者没有评估病人体重的材料,三分之二的受访者没有系统地评估超重或肥胖。最后,研究结果表明,精神科医生未能根据男性或女性的轮廓准确评估超重或肥胖情况:看来,应采取措施提高精神科医生对体重超标者所蒙受耻辱的认识,并提高精神科体重增加护理的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Une revue française de renommée internationale. - Un comite de rédaction représentant tous les aspects de la prise en charge psychiatrique du patient. - Une sélection rigoureuse d''articles faisant l''objet de plusieurs expertises. - Des travaux d''auteurs et de chercheurs de renommée internationale. - Des indexations dans les grandes bases de données (Current Contents, Excerpta Medica, etc.). - Un facteur d''impact qui témoigne de la grande notoriété de la revue. La tribune des publications originales de haut niveau. - Une très grande diversité des sujets traités, rigoureusement sélectionnés à travers des sommaires dynamiques : - des éditoriaux de médecins référents, - une revue de presse sur les actualités internationales, - des articles originaux pour approfondir vos connaissances, - des mises au point et des cas cliniques pour engager votre réflexion sur les indications et choix possibles au travers de mises en situation clinique, - des dossiers thématiques pour faire le tour d''une question. - L''actualité de l''AFPB : L''Encéphale publie régulièrement des comptes rendus de l''Association française de psychiatrie clinique.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of problematic drug use in Martinique in 2006: The NEMO study. [On the leads of Pinel, francophone psychiatry shines over the Mediterranean]. An exploratory study of blind spot bias in psychiatrists: The value of mindfulness and ethical skills'. Early access to post-emergency addiction care: ASAP project. Experience of neurofeedback and methylphenidate in children with ADHD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1