Rasch analysis of the depression anxiety stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury sample.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Brain injury Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2411297
Josh W Faulkner, Deborah L Snell, R J Siegert
{"title":"Rasch analysis of the depression anxiety stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury sample.","authors":"Josh W Faulkner, Deborah L Snell, R J Siegert","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2411297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 items (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Treatment-seeking adults (<i>n</i> = 347) were recruited from outpatient rehabilitation services in New Zealand. Dimensionality, reliability, person separation index, and differential item functioning (DIF) of the DASS-21 were examined using Rasch analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial analysis of the complete 21-item DASS showed poor overall fit due to problems with individual items. Fit to the Rasch model was excellent when treated as three composite scores. The stress subscale demonstrated adequate model fit, dimensionality and good reliability. For anxiety, fit was not good, reliability was unsatisfactory and DIF was evident on one item. When this item was removed, fit to the model was still inadequate as was reliability. DIF was also evident for depression, but when this item was removed, fit to the model was adequate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DASS-21 is a psychometrically sound measure of distress and stress for adults seeking treatment following mTBI. Ordinal to interval score conversion tables are provided to increase the precision of measurement. When assessing depression in a mTBI population, a 6-item depression subscale is recommended. Caution is advised in using the DASS-21 anxiety subscale alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"136-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2411297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 items (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) sample.

Method: Treatment-seeking adults (n = 347) were recruited from outpatient rehabilitation services in New Zealand. Dimensionality, reliability, person separation index, and differential item functioning (DIF) of the DASS-21 were examined using Rasch analysis.

Results: Initial analysis of the complete 21-item DASS showed poor overall fit due to problems with individual items. Fit to the Rasch model was excellent when treated as three composite scores. The stress subscale demonstrated adequate model fit, dimensionality and good reliability. For anxiety, fit was not good, reliability was unsatisfactory and DIF was evident on one item. When this item was removed, fit to the model was still inadequate as was reliability. DIF was also evident for depression, but when this item was removed, fit to the model was adequate.

Conclusion: The DASS-21 is a psychometrically sound measure of distress and stress for adults seeking treatment following mTBI. Ordinal to interval score conversion tables are provided to increase the precision of measurement. When assessing depression in a mTBI population, a 6-item depression subscale is recommended. Caution is advised in using the DASS-21 anxiety subscale alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对轻度脑外伤样本中的抑郁焦虑压力量表-21(DASS-21)进行 Rasch 分析。
目的:本研究评估了轻度创伤性脑损伤样本中抑郁焦虑压力量表 21 个项目(DASS-21)的心理测量特性:在这项研究中,我们评估了轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)样本中抑郁焦虑压力量表 21 个条目(DASS-21)的心理测量特性:方法:我们从新西兰的门诊康复服务机构招募了寻求治疗的成年人(n = 347)。采用 Rasch 分析法对 DASS-21 的维度、可靠性、人员分离指数和差异项目功能(DIF)进行了研究:结果:对完整的 21 个条目 DASS 的初步分析表明,由于个别条目存在问题,整体拟合度较差。如果将其作为三个综合分数处理,则与 Rasch 模型的拟合度非常好。压力分量表显示出足够的模型拟合度、维度和良好的可靠性。在焦虑方面,拟合效果不佳,信度不理想,而且有一个项目的 DIF 很明显。删除该项目后,模型的拟合度和信度仍不理想。抑郁症的 DIF 也很明显,但去掉这个项目后,模型的拟合度还是足够的:结论:DASS-21 是一种心理测量方法,适用于 mTBI 后寻求治疗的成年人。为了提高测量的精确度,我们提供了从序数到区间的分数转换表。在对 mTBI 群体进行抑郁评估时,建议使用 6 项抑郁子量表。建议谨慎单独使用 DASS-21 焦虑分量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Medical complications and advance medical decision-making in the minimally conscious state. Responding to the ongoing pandemic-related challenges of individuals with brain injury through the perspective of community-service in Canada: A qualitative study. Understanding 'quality' in adult traumatic brain injury rehabilitation from the perspectives of different stakeholders: a participatory mixed methods study. Understanding factors influencing exercise program adherence for youth with persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS). Dodecafluoropentane improves neuro-behavioral outcomes and return of spontaneous circulation rate in a swine model of cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1