The prognostic value of skeletal muscle mass and density in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Future oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1080/14796694.2024.2402215
Huijun Deng, Leiqiong Wang, Yuxuan Li
{"title":"The prognostic value of skeletal muscle mass and density in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Huijun Deng, Leiqiong Wang, Yuxuan Li","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2024.2402215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> The effect of skeletal muscle mass and density on the long-term survival outcome of breast cancer patients is unclear.<b>Materials & methods:</b> Systematically searched all articles in PubMed, Web of science, Springerlink, EMBASE and Wiley databases that studied the association between skeletal muscle and survival outcomes of breast cancer by 25 September 2023. The hazard ratios and confidence intervals of the multiple factor analysis results controlling for confounding variables in the study were collected and analyzed using STATA 14.0 software.<b>Results:</b> This meta-analysis included a total of 13 studies, with a median age of 48.2 years. Meta results showed that the survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89-1.08) and recurrence (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-1.00) outcomes of breast cancer patients with sarcopenia were not significantly affected compared with those without sarcopenia. No significant heterogeneity or publication bias was observed in the study.<b>Conclusion:</b> The conclusion that skeletal muscle is regarded as a useful factor that can guide and optimize the prognosis of breast cancer patients is uncertain, or the result is very weak. Considering the impact of research quality and confounding factors, prospective studies are needed in the future to further demonstrate.PROSPERO identifier: CRD42023463480 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2024.2402215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The effect of skeletal muscle mass and density on the long-term survival outcome of breast cancer patients is unclear.Materials & methods: Systematically searched all articles in PubMed, Web of science, Springerlink, EMBASE and Wiley databases that studied the association between skeletal muscle and survival outcomes of breast cancer by 25 September 2023. The hazard ratios and confidence intervals of the multiple factor analysis results controlling for confounding variables in the study were collected and analyzed using STATA 14.0 software.Results: This meta-analysis included a total of 13 studies, with a median age of 48.2 years. Meta results showed that the survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89-1.08) and recurrence (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-1.00) outcomes of breast cancer patients with sarcopenia were not significantly affected compared with those without sarcopenia. No significant heterogeneity or publication bias was observed in the study.Conclusion: The conclusion that skeletal muscle is regarded as a useful factor that can guide and optimize the prognosis of breast cancer patients is uncertain, or the result is very weak. Considering the impact of research quality and confounding factors, prospective studies are needed in the future to further demonstrate.PROSPERO identifier: CRD42023463480 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌患者骨骼肌质量和密度的预后价值:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:骨骼肌质量和密度对乳腺癌患者长期生存结果的影响尚不明确:系统检索了截至2023年9月25日PubMed、Web of science、Springerlink、EMBASE和Wiley数据库中所有研究骨骼肌与乳腺癌生存结果相关性的文章。使用 STATA 14.0 软件收集并分析了研究中控制混杂变量的多因素分析结果的危险比和置信区间:该荟萃分析共纳入 13 项研究,中位年龄为 48.2 岁。荟萃结果显示,与无肌肉疏松症的乳腺癌患者相比,有肌肉疏松症的乳腺癌患者的生存率(危险比 [HR]:0.98,95% CI:0.89-1.08)和复发率(HR:0.96,95% CI:0.92-1.00)并无明显影响。研究未发现明显的异质性或发表偏倚:认为骨骼肌是指导和优化乳腺癌患者预后的有用因素这一结论并不确定,或者说结果非常微弱。考虑到研究质量和混杂因素的影响,未来需要进行前瞻性研究来进一步证明:CRD42023463480 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
期刊最新文献
Sotorasib for the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Artificial intelligence and radiomics in desmoid-type fibromatosis: are we there yet? Evaluation of CDK4/6 inhibitors in first-line in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with metastatic breast cancer. Tislelizumab for consolidation therapy in patients with pathologically residual Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after definitive concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled phase II trial. Current practices for the management of advanced high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer in the UK: OC-NOW survey (2023).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1