Classification of Kudoa thyrsites infected and uninfected fish using a handheld near-infrared spectrophotometer, SIMCA and PLS-DA.

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Journal of fish diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-06 DOI:10.1111/jfd.14025
S Henning
{"title":"Classification of Kudoa thyrsites infected and uninfected fish using a handheld near-infrared spectrophotometer, SIMCA and PLS-DA.","authors":"S Henning","doi":"10.1111/jfd.14025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kudoa thyrsites infection of marine fish typically results in myoliquefaction, which is only apparent 24 to 56 h post-mortem. The traditional methods for the detection of K. thyrsites infected fish are time-consuming and destructive, reducing its marketability. This poses a challenge for the fish industry to remove infected fish before it reaches the market or further processing activities. This study investigated the use of near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, in combination with soft independent modelling of class analogy (SIMCA) and partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), for discriminating K. thyrsites infected fish from uninfected fish. Performance of the classification models was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity, specificity and precision. A total of 334 fish samples (200 sardine, 64 hake and 70 kingklip) were used for this study. Infection of K. thyrsites was determined with the use of qPCR assays. Ninety per cent (90%) of the sardine samples, 78% of the hake samples and 37% of the kingklip samples were infected. Class groups of infected and uninfected fish samples were created for the purpose of generating SIMCA and PLS-DA classification models for each species of fish, as well as for a species independent data set. Principal component analysis (PCA) of NIR spectra did not show any clustering for infected and uninfected samples. Calibration and test sample sets were generated for the purpose of building and testing the SIMCA and PLD-DA classification models. SIMCA and PLS-DA were unable to classify test samples correctly into the two classes. The number of misclassifications (NMC) was higher for the SIMCA models than for the PLS-DA models, with more than 60% incorrectly classified. SIMCA classified most of the test samples into both classes. The precision for PLS-DA were 89% for sardine, 81% for hake, 0% for kingklip and 87% for species independent models, however, most samples were classified at infected. The use of NIR spectroscopy and classification models such as SIMCA and PLS-DA showed limited use as a method to distinguish between K. thyrsites infected and uninfected fish samples. Textural and chemical changes during extended frozen storage of the fish samples may have masked the effects associated with K. thyrsites infection. Further studies are suggested where NIR spectroscopy is used in combination with texture analysis and image spectroscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of fish diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of fish diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.14025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kudoa thyrsites infection of marine fish typically results in myoliquefaction, which is only apparent 24 to 56 h post-mortem. The traditional methods for the detection of K. thyrsites infected fish are time-consuming and destructive, reducing its marketability. This poses a challenge for the fish industry to remove infected fish before it reaches the market or further processing activities. This study investigated the use of near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, in combination with soft independent modelling of class analogy (SIMCA) and partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), for discriminating K. thyrsites infected fish from uninfected fish. Performance of the classification models was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity, specificity and precision. A total of 334 fish samples (200 sardine, 64 hake and 70 kingklip) were used for this study. Infection of K. thyrsites was determined with the use of qPCR assays. Ninety per cent (90%) of the sardine samples, 78% of the hake samples and 37% of the kingklip samples were infected. Class groups of infected and uninfected fish samples were created for the purpose of generating SIMCA and PLS-DA classification models for each species of fish, as well as for a species independent data set. Principal component analysis (PCA) of NIR spectra did not show any clustering for infected and uninfected samples. Calibration and test sample sets were generated for the purpose of building and testing the SIMCA and PLD-DA classification models. SIMCA and PLS-DA were unable to classify test samples correctly into the two classes. The number of misclassifications (NMC) was higher for the SIMCA models than for the PLS-DA models, with more than 60% incorrectly classified. SIMCA classified most of the test samples into both classes. The precision for PLS-DA were 89% for sardine, 81% for hake, 0% for kingklip and 87% for species independent models, however, most samples were classified at infected. The use of NIR spectroscopy and classification models such as SIMCA and PLS-DA showed limited use as a method to distinguish between K. thyrsites infected and uninfected fish samples. Textural and chemical changes during extended frozen storage of the fish samples may have masked the effects associated with K. thyrsites infection. Further studies are suggested where NIR spectroscopy is used in combination with texture analysis and image spectroscopy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用手持式近红外分光光度计、SIMCA 和 PLS-DA 对受 Kudoa thyrsites 感染和未感染的鱼类进行分类。
海鱼感染 Kudoa thyrsites 通常会导致肌软化,只有在死后 24 至 56 小时才会显现。检测受 K. thyrsites 感染的鱼类的传统方法既费时又具有破坏性,降低了鱼类的销售能力。这就给渔业带来了挑战,如何在受感染的鱼进入市场或进一步加工活动之前将其移除。本研究调查了近红外光谱与类类比软独立建模(SIMCA)和偏最小二乘法判别分析(PLS-DA)的结合使用情况,以判别感染 K. thyrsites 的鱼和未感染的鱼。通过计算灵敏度、特异性和精确度来评估分类模型的性能。本研究共使用了 334 份鱼类样本(200 份沙丁鱼样本、64 份无须鳕样本和 70 份鳞鳕样本)。使用 qPCR 检测法确定是否感染了 K. thyrsites。90%的沙丁鱼样本、78%的无须鳕样本和 37% 的帝王鲷样本受到感染。为生成 SIMCA 和 PLS-DA 分类模型,我们创建了感染和未感染鱼类样本的类组,用于每种鱼类以及独立于物种的数据集。近红外光谱的主成分分析(PCA)未显示出受感染和未感染样本的任何聚类。为建立和测试 SIMCA 和 PLD-DA 分类模型,生成了校准和测试样本集。SIMCA 和 PLS-DA 无法将测试样本正确划分为两个类别。SIMCA 模型的误分类次数(NMC)高于 PLS-DA 模型,误分类次数超过 60%。SIMCA 将大多数测试样本归入了两个类别。PLS-DA 模型对沙丁鱼的精确度为 89%,对无须鳕的精确度为 81%,对帝王鲽的精确度为 0%,对物种独立模型的精确度为 87%,然而,大多数样本都是在感染时被分类的。使用近红外光谱和分类模型(如 SIMCA 和 PLS-DA)来区分感染和未感染的鱼类样本的效果有限。鱼类样本在长时间冷冻储存过程中的纹理和化学变化可能掩盖了与沙雷氏痢疾杆菌感染相关的影响。建议进一步开展研究,将近红外光谱与纹理分析和图像光谱结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of fish diseases
Journal of fish diseases 农林科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Fish Diseases enjoys an international reputation as the medium for the exchange of information on original research into all aspects of disease in both wild and cultured fish and shellfish. Areas of interest regularly covered by the journal include: -host-pathogen relationships- studies of fish pathogens- pathophysiology- diagnostic methods- therapy- epidemiology- descriptions of new diseases
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Constituents From Brazilian Propolis Against Edwardsiella ictaluri and Flavobacterium covae, Two Bacteria Affecting Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). The Impact of Exposure Dosage and Host Genetics on the Shedding Kinetics of Flavobacterium psychrophilum in Rainbow Trout. Classification of Kudoa thyrsites infected and uninfected fish using a handheld near-infrared spectrophotometer, SIMCA and PLS-DA. AI-Driven Realtime Monitoring of Early Indicators for Ichthyophthirius multifiliis Infection of Rainbow Trout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1