Real-world comparative effectiveness of sotorasib versus docetaxel in second line and beyond among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Lung Cancer Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107960
Melissa Johnson , Diana Younan , Shia T. Kent , Marco Mesa-Frias , M. Alan Brookhart , Akhila Balasubramanian , Alexander Spira
{"title":"Real-world comparative effectiveness of sotorasib versus docetaxel in second line and beyond among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)","authors":"Melissa Johnson ,&nbsp;Diana Younan ,&nbsp;Shia T. Kent ,&nbsp;Marco Mesa-Frias ,&nbsp;M. Alan Brookhart ,&nbsp;Akhila Balasubramanian ,&nbsp;Alexander Spira","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of sotorasib monotherapy versus docetaxel as monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with pretreated <em>KRAS</em> G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC in the real-world.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A US-based electronic health record–derived de-identified database was used in this study. Patients with pretreated <em>KRAS</em> G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC who initiated sotorasib between May 28, 2021, and September 30, 2022, and docetaxel between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2022 (to enhance sample size), were included, with a minimum of 12-month opportunity for follow-up. Treatment groups were balanced via overlap weighting propensity score methods. Median OS in the 2L and 2L+ settings were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated via Cox proportional hazard models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, the clinical characteristics in sotorasib and docetaxel cohorts were balanced after propensity score weighting. At baseline, most patients were &gt; 65 years of age, had ECOG performance status of 0–1, were from the community practice setting, had advanced stage at initial diagnosis, and had prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment and/or platinum-based chemotherapy. In the 2L setting, the median OS (95 % CI) for sotorasib (N=102) and docetaxel (N=58) patients was 10.2 (7.6–16.3) and 6.0 (4.2–11.0) months, respectively, with a corresponding mortality HR (95 % CI) of 0.62 (0.41–0.93). In the 2L+ setting, the median OS (95 % CI) for sotorasib (N=164) and docetaxel (N=116) was 10.2 (8.0–14.6) and 7.2 (5.1–10.6) months, respectively, with a corresponding mortality HR (95 % CI) of 0.65 (0.49–0.87). In patients with prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, the mortality HR (95 % CI) in the sotorasib group versus docetaxel was 0.61 (0.39–0.94) and 0.65 (0.48–0.89) in the 2L and 2L+ settings, respectively. Findings from other subgroups were consistent with the primary analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this real-world comparative analysis of patients with pretreated <em>KRAS</em> G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, sotorasib monotherapy demonstrated a longer median OS compared to docetaxel monotherapy or combination therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107960"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016950022400494X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of sotorasib monotherapy versus docetaxel as monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC in the real-world.

Methods

A US-based electronic health record–derived de-identified database was used in this study. Patients with pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC who initiated sotorasib between May 28, 2021, and September 30, 2022, and docetaxel between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2022 (to enhance sample size), were included, with a minimum of 12-month opportunity for follow-up. Treatment groups were balanced via overlap weighting propensity score methods. Median OS in the 2L and 2L+ settings were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated via Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

Overall, the clinical characteristics in sotorasib and docetaxel cohorts were balanced after propensity score weighting. At baseline, most patients were > 65 years of age, had ECOG performance status of 0–1, were from the community practice setting, had advanced stage at initial diagnosis, and had prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment and/or platinum-based chemotherapy. In the 2L setting, the median OS (95 % CI) for sotorasib (N=102) and docetaxel (N=58) patients was 10.2 (7.6–16.3) and 6.0 (4.2–11.0) months, respectively, with a corresponding mortality HR (95 % CI) of 0.62 (0.41–0.93). In the 2L+ setting, the median OS (95 % CI) for sotorasib (N=164) and docetaxel (N=116) was 10.2 (8.0–14.6) and 7.2 (5.1–10.6) months, respectively, with a corresponding mortality HR (95 % CI) of 0.65 (0.49–0.87). In patients with prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, the mortality HR (95 % CI) in the sotorasib group versus docetaxel was 0.61 (0.39–0.94) and 0.65 (0.48–0.89) in the 2L and 2L+ settings, respectively. Findings from other subgroups were consistent with the primary analyses.

Conclusion

In this real-world comparative analysis of patients with pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, sotorasib monotherapy demonstrated a longer median OS compared to docetaxel monotherapy or combination therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在晚期非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 患者中,索托拉西布与多西他赛在二线及二线以上治疗中的实际效果比较。
目的评估索托拉西布单药治疗与多西他赛单药治疗或联合治疗在现实世界中对KRAS G12C突变晚期NSCLC患者的疗效比较:本研究使用了基于美国电子健康记录的去标识数据库。研究纳入了在 2021 年 5 月 28 日至 2022 年 9 月 30 日期间接受索托拉西布治疗,以及在 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月 30 日期间接受多西他赛治疗(以增加样本量)的 KRAS G12C 突变晚期 NSCLC 患者,随访时间至少为 12 个月。治疗组通过重叠加权倾向评分法进行平衡。采用卡普兰-梅耶估计值计算2L和2L+治疗组的中位OS。通过 Cox 比例危险模型估算危险比(HRs):总体而言,经过倾向得分加权后,索托拉西布和多西他赛两组患者的临床特征是平衡的。基线时,大多数患者年龄大于65岁,ECOG表现为0-1级,来自社区医疗机构,初诊时为晚期,既往接受过抗PD-(L)1治疗和/或铂类化疗。在2L治疗中,索托拉西布(102例)和多西他赛(58例)患者的中位OS(95 % CI)分别为10.2(7.6-16.3)个月和6.0(4.2-11.0)个月,相应的死亡率HR(95 % CI)为0.62(0.41-0.93)。在2L+设置中,索托拉西布(N=164)和多西他赛(N=116)的中位OS(95 % CI)分别为10.2(8.0-14.6)个月和7.2(5.1-10.6)个月,相应的死亡率HR(95 % CI)为0.65(0.49-0.87)。在既往接受过抗PD-(L)1治疗的患者中,索托拉西布组与多西他赛组相比,在2L和2L+两种情况下的死亡率HR(95 % CI)分别为0.61(0.39-0.94)和0.65(0.48-0.89)。其他亚组的结果与主要分析一致:结论:在这项针对KRAS G12C突变晚期NSCLC预处理患者的真实世界比较分析中,索托拉西布单药治疗的中位OS长于多西他赛单药治疗或联合治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
407
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Addressing knowledge and attitude barriers to lung cancer screening: Development and evaluation of web-based decision aid Lorlatinib-associated weight gain and dyslipidaemia: A retrospective analysis and implications for future care The molecular subtypes of small cell lung cancer defined by key transcription factors and their clinical significance Radiological follow-up in patients with resected pulmonary carcinoids: Should we reduce radiation exposure? Diagnostic performance of Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted bronchoscopy with mobile Cone-Beam CT for cystic and cavitary pulmonary lesions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1